For now we’re planning something.@AsciLab
Is there any future plan to make affordable* three way speakers. Basically goal being few hz more low frequency and less intermodulation distortion ? Generally a dome tweeter, ~3 inch mid range and ~8 inch woofer.
*Affordability is subjective but still would like to know.
Put me on the waiting list. Perhaps a survey thread to test the level of enthusiasm from the members with a vote? There's been a dozen or more inquiries over the various AsciLab threads... including from me.For now we’re planning something.
Anyway, using 3” midrange 3 way speaker is always in my mind. Someday I’ll try it.
I will take the chance to move a bit off -topic. What would be the advantage of a 3-way of similar size (purely naive question)? @AsciLab stated that the F6B & C6B cannot be compared to the KEF R3 but frequency response (including low frequencies) and dispersion are on par. Would dispersion be the main forecasted improvement? Thanks!@AsciLab
Is there any future plan to make affordable* three way speakers. Basically goal being few hz more low frequency and less intermodulation distortion ? Generally a dome tweeter, ~3 inch mid range and ~8 inch woofer.
*Affordability is subjective but still would like to know.
I am also newbie. But some advantage would be as stated little more low end and lower intermodulation distortion. Probably if correct drivers are selected better overall distortion (But might increase the cost).* As for KEF R3 (I like them) but are expensive.I will take the chance to move a bit off -topic. What would be the advantage of a 3-way of similar size (purely naive question)? @AsciLab stated that the F6B & C6B cannot be compared to the KEF R3 but frequency response (including low frequencies) and dispersion are on par. Would dispersion be the main forecasted improvement? Thanks!
It is all about IMD. A woofer producing bass to high frequency can’t be out of IMD. When the woofer moves long excursion, mid to high frequency suffers from various problem. Like Bl,Le modulation and inevitable Doppler distortion(rather benign though).I will take the chance to move a bit off -topic. What would be the advantage of a 3-way of similar size (purely naive question)? @AsciLab stated that the F6B & C6B cannot be compared to the KEF R3 but frequency response (including low frequencies) and dispersion are on par. Would dispersion be the main forecasted improvement? Thanks!
I see that those "base extenders" in your official roadmap are pretty expensive, and i expect that once you connect them to the main speaker, the passive radiators in the main speakers become a useless feature (and a useless cost) which is not economically (and environmentally) friendly, and they could eventually interact with what the base extender is doing.For now we’re planning something.
Soon we’ll open.
Anyway, using 3” midrange 3 way speaker is always in my mind. Someday I’ll try it.
Bit late to the party on this, but in the UK it is more common to use “Matt” when referring to paint.Just a quick correction you might want to implement on your website and marketing materials: the correct English term for a smooth, non-reflective finish is “matte” and not “matt.” Therefore, describing a finish as “Matt white” makes it seem like a shade of white preferred by a person named Matt. “Matte white” is probably what you meant to say. I am not trying to be pedantic. Rather, using the word “Matt” looks like a typo or misspelling and could reflect negatively on the brand, however minor.
I think the F6C ($3000) or C5C at $3,500 is the closest to this. Comes with 2 woofers plus Hypex amp. I think the DSP and amp are needed to keep boxes smaller and control subs as desired.I see that those "base extenders" in your official roadmap are pretty expensive, and i expect that once you connect them to the main speaker, the passive radiators in the main speakers become a useless feature (and a useless cost) which is not economically (and environmentally) friendly, and they could eventually interact with what the base extender is doing.
On the opposite side, just adding two or three proper 8 inches woofers to the C6B and removing the passive radiator may result in a much more budget friendly solution (plus, small detail, you literally destroy the market)
The passive radiator doesn’t become useless, it’s still doing its job in supporting the woofer by reinforcing the frequencies it was designed for. The extension module picks up the frequencies below that point.I see that those "base extenders" in your official roadmap are pretty expensive, and i expect that once you connect them to the main speaker, the passive radiators in the main speakers become a useless feature (and a useless cost) which is not economically (and environmentally) friendly, and they could eventually interact with what the base extender is doing.
On the opposite side, just adding two or three proper 8 inches woofers to the C6B and removing the passive radiator may result in a much more budget friendly solution (plus, small detail, you literally destroy the market)
Not, if the sub is crossed around 200 Hz (or 80 for HT). In that constellation a closed box would be more preferable/ the passive membrane not very much in use, since it's resonance frequency is below that.The passive radiator doesn’t become useless, it’s still doing its job in supporting the woofer by reinforcing the frequencies it was designed for. The extension module picks up the frequencies below that point.
Right. I issued a mea culpa to Ascilab after learning this!Bit late to the party on this, but in the UK it is more common to use “Matt” when referring to paint.
View attachment 457987
Hi Ascilab, and thank you for your responsiveness here, and the amazing engineering of you and the team!In most countries, customs duties and taxes are calculated based on the total of the product price and shipping cost. Therefore, the final amount of tax to be paid will be the same.
However, since tax policies vary by country, we recommend checking with the relevant authorities in your country for the most accurate information.
@AsciLab - in case you didn’t see the above, then mea culpa, I stand corrected!Really? Well OK! It is “matte” in the U.S. (paint finishes are flat, matte, eggshell, satin, semi-gloss, and gloss) but I guess given the UK spelling, then “matt” works too.