UPDATE: as always, rationalization had to follow the first impressions
1) For some reason I expected C6Bs to be less sensitive than DBR62s so I increased the volume by few notches. But it's the other way around (85.6db vs 84.3db mean SPL measured by Erin), and while still at low volume, I was listening at a bit higher volume than usual. It was quite enjoyable thanks to the clean midrange, but the cymbals were getting too prominent for my liking.
2) I kept the EQ settings I developed for DBR62, mostly for room modes, but over time it got quite complex and reduced the bass overall (speakers are only 25cm from the front wall). While C6B's bass goes a bit deeper, midbass is very flat, DBR62 on the other hand has a midbass bump (70-200hz) up to 2db from mean. So I made the C6B leaner by using that EQ, which made the upper frequencies stand out more.
3) The C6B tweeter's constant/widening directivity proved to be a double-edged sword. Dbr62's top end is a bit brighter on axis, but its directivity is narrowing and I could effectively tame it by toeing out. That does not work with C6B at all
My brain has not yet fully "broken-in", the impression of sparkly cymbals is still present, but it varies a lot between recordings. I need to be more careful with conditioning, start with lower than usual volume and gradually increase to (my) normal levels. I may add some slope to the EQ for treble heavy recordings.
PS: I use Nuprime IDA-8 amp, which is 10 years old class A+D design. I was curious whether its (presumed) load dependency was adding a bit of sparkle. I tried Wiim Vibelink which was measured by Erin and Amir as load independent. Even with my confirmation bias fully turned on, there was no lasting relief, there were a few promising stretches, but I concluded it makes no difference.