• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

AsciLab A6B Review

Nuyes

Active Member
Reviewer
Joined
Jun 8, 2022
Messages
234
Likes
4,059
Location
South Korea
I sincerely apologize for the significant delay in posting this review. Thank you to everyone who patiently waited.

IMG_3428 Large.jpeg




IMG_3427 2 Large.jpeg


IMG_3434 2 Large.jpeg





This review marks a milestone, as it is the first time I’ve measured a total of 11 samples simultaneously, thanks to the collaboration of the manufacturer and individual owners.
It was a monumental project for me personally.


Let’s dive in.





Impedance


01.png

02.png








Frequency Response


03.png



The curve is generally flat, with the bass roll-off extending to approximately 33.6 Hz at -6dB (relative to the 100–10kHz average) before descending at a slope of 40dB/octave.




04.png

To validate my measurement system against the manufacturer’s NFS (Near-Field Scanner) system, I had to cross-check results using their official sample.
The differences between the two curves stem from subtle response variations between the microphones used. For further details, please refer to the C5B review linked below.







Nearfield Measurement


05.png



All components of the loudspeaker are neatly executed.
The estimated crossover frequency is around 1.1kHz, which is impressively low. Achieving such clean and robust performance at this frequency is no small feat.
Let’s examine this further in the THD and MD sections.





Directivity


06.png

07.png



The speaker exhibits exceptionally smooth directivity.
Attenuation and diffraction effects are also well-controlled.


08.png

09.png



Wow... it’s hard not to be amazed.
Who could imagine such vertical directivity coming from a 6.5-inch 2-way speaker? The result is incredibly flat and stunningly beautiful.





Beamwidth


10.png

11.png



The smoothly controlled directivity ensures excellent tolerance near the crossover frequency.






Polar Plot


12.png



The result is close to ideal.


13.png



On the vertical plane, the energy radiation patterns for each frequency band converge uniformly. Impressive!





THD (Total Harmonic Distortion)


14.png
15.png
16.png



Extremely low and clean THD...
Particularly around 1kHz, the performance is almost unbelievable.


Considering the crossover point is approximately 1.1kHz, one would expect a slight rise in distortion somewhere between 800Hz and 1.5kHz.
However, the manufacturer has achieved balanced directivity while maximizing acoustic efficiency through exceptional waveguide and crossover design.


Higher acoustic efficiency means the tweeter doesn’t need to move as much, resulting in lower distortion and a cleaner overall performance.




17.png
18.png

19.png




Even at 95dB SPL @1m, the performance remains rock solid.



THD 85dB SPL @1m (11 Samples)


19_2.png



I reviewed all 11 samples. Most performed exceptionally well, but one sample exhibited unusually high second harmonic distortion.


19_3.png



Upon discovering this during the review process, I immediately reported the issue to the manufacturer. They responded promptly, stating they would retrieve the affected sample from the customer and conduct a thorough analysis.



Multitone Test


20.png

21.png



This is the perfect marriage of high-quality materials and expert craftsmanship.
For a 2-way speaker, the multitone distortion (MD) performance is astoundingly clean.





22.png


Paired with a subwoofer, the performance could be even more powerful.


23.png


24.png




Compression Test


25.png



The compression performance is exceptionally strong, recording levels so low that they’re nearly within the margin of measurement error.




Deviation Between 11 Samples


27.png



I compared a total of 11 samples, calculating the relative response of the remaining 10 samples against the manufacturer’s reference sample.
 
Last edited:
Endgame 2-way speaker!

I can’t imagine a better 2-way passive speaker than this.

It seems like the 80Hz MD data is missing.


Edit) I found that data in the attachment.
 
Excellent results, as expected. I hope Ascilab will report back on the outlier.

However, I'm slightly confused by the HPF-ed MD data:
22.png

@Nuyes Why would an 80Hz HPF reduce tweeter distortion?
 
Endgame 2-way speaker!

I can’t imagine a better 2-way passive speaker than this.

It seems like the 80Hz MD data is missing.


Edit) I found that data in the attachment.
Excellent results, as expected. I hope Ascilab will report back on the outlier.

However, I'm slightly confused by the HPF-ed MD data:
View attachment 421808

@Nuyes Why would an 80Hz HPF reduce tweeter distortion?


Thanks a lot!


@staticV3

There might be various reasons why an HPF could reduce distortion in a tweeter. While it doesn’t seem to directly intervene, one possible explanation could be that it reduces noise originating from other components involved in low-frequency reproduction.

I’ve encountered similar situations numerous times, but the specifics always tend to vary slightly. If the opportunity arises, I’d love to analyze these cases in greater detail.
 
Thanks a lot!


@staticV3

There might be various reasons why an HPF could reduce distortion in a tweeter. While it doesn’t seem to directly intervene, one possible explanation could be that it reduces noise originating from other components involved in low-frequency reproduction.

I’ve encountered similar situations numerous times, but the specifics always tend to vary slightly. If the opportunity arises, I’d love to analyze these cases in greater detail.
AFAIK, Nuyes use full range flat curve when measure 85,95dB MD measurement though he uses weighted curve when measure stepping MD measurement, 75,85,95dB.

For this reason, When measuring full range flat curve multi tones, there will be very high excursion below PR resonance frequency. It makes woofer and PR move to the Xmax limit, then it can make wide range distortion.
So lowered HF distortion is not “tweeter distortion”. Rather it is wide range distortion occurred by woofer.

This is what I think IMHO, How do you think @Nuyes?


PS. And thanks for this detail review! What an effort.
 
Wow! Excellent engineering!!
 
AFAIK, Nuyes use full range flat curve when measure 85,95dB MD measurement though he uses weighted curve when measure stepping MD measurement, 75,85,95dB.

For this reason, When measuring full range flat curve multi tones, there will be very high excursion below PR resonance frequency. It makes woofer and PR move to the Xmax limit, then it can make wide range distortion.
So lowered HF distortion is not “tweeter distortion”. Rather it is wide range distortion occurred by woofer.

This is what I think IMHO, How do you think @Nuyes?


PS. And thanks for this detail review! What an effort.
Your understanding of the measurement methods, technical aspects, and your opinion align perfectly with mine!

Reproducing deep bass at high levels comes with significant trade-offs. This includes not only wideband distortion caused by the mechanical strain on the speaker driver and displacement limitations (protection) but also various vibration effects and noise affecting almost every component of the speaker system. (In the case of the A6B, however, this is unlikely to be an issue due to its extremely heavy enclosure, IMO.)
 
WOW!

Let's not get all jaded and blasé.. Those are extraordinary performances , which beg the question: How much are those little jewels? Per pair?re these available in ther USW , the World?
Congratulations to its Manufacturers, Wishing them a long, successful life on the marketplace.

Peace.
 
Those are extraordinary performances , which beg the question: How much are those little jewels? Per pair?re these available in ther USW , the World?
See the master thread :D
 
Amazing speaker.
Expected price: $2900 for pair
 
I compared a total of 11 samples, calculating the relative response of the remaining 10 samples against the manufacturer’s reference sample
Congratulations and thanks for the quality and quantity of work here.
I am looking forward to a super-low-distrotion full-range system and maybe AsciLab is the source- not sure if I should wait for their later efforts?
Edit- now I understand the quote, you present the data only for the FR from all samples. Ta.
Great job Nuyes and AsciLab!
 
Last edited:
I already have two SVS SB 2000 subs plus Dirac Live DLBC on my Window's box, so I see these as near endgame upgrades for my LS 50 Metas. Possibly later this year, but there is the question of when are they going to be available in places other than South Korea.
 
Last edited:
Your understanding of the measurement methods, technical aspects, and your opinion align perfectly with mine!

Reproducing deep bass at high levels comes with significant trade-offs. This includes not only wideband distortion caused by the mechanical strain on the speaker driver and displacement limitations (protection) but also various vibration effects and noise affecting almost every component of the speaker system. (In the case of the A6B, however, this is unlikely to be an issue due to its extremely heavy enclosure, IMO.)
What mic did you use?
 
Endgame 2-way speaker!

I can’t imagine a better 2-way passive speaker than this.

It seems like the 80Hz MD data is missing.


Edit) I found that data in the attachment.
Maybe Kef R3?
 
11 samples???That's surely a first!
I really like the tight tolerances,and high-ish output ability with low distortion.
There's nothing to be critical about as it seems.
Love to listen to a pair preferably assisted with bass bins.

Thanks Nuyes!
 
Back
Top Bottom