It's not your own AI , or not? If so don't complain, then the work was done elsewhere.There are a myriad of very useful applications. The big question is how much are customers willing to pay for those.
Our company provides a very cool AI tool that makes the configuration and operation of very complex products much easier. Works really well, saves a lot of time. But basically customers just go "I am not paying for this, but thanks for providing it for free for now - not my fault your stuff is very complex and very expensive, you kinda owe us this stuff.".![]()
It was and remains fully developed/trained in-house. It is our own agentic AI tool. The hardware to power it is part ours, but also inevitably Nvidia and hosted on two hyperscale cloud providers. Nope the work was not done anywhere else.It's not your own AI , or not? If so don't complain, then the work was done elsewhere.
Nobody needs Apple, not in the same way that we need Google, Amazon, and even Microsoft. Try to live a week without using any services from the last 3. Even if you don't buy anything from Amazon, or own any Alexa products, it is likely that some website you use will be on Amazon or Microsoft web services. Now try to live without Apple. It's quite easy to do, I have been boycotting Apple for 20 years.

Ok, so you have the right to complainIt was and remains fully developed/trained in-house. It is our own agentic AI tool. The hardware to power it is part ours, but also inevitably Nvidia and hosted on two hyperscale cloud providers. Nope the work was not done anywhere else.
No one has disputed imports have economic impact. But GDP just concerns itself with gross domestic output, and imports are subtracted in the formula, so they don't count towards GDP. They impact it for sure. You are confusing definition with math calculation.
[And the punch missed the target by a mile, so no pain, thanks.]
How will firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics because a bad economic report comes out impact future reporting?
Of course you're right but these (and this) thoughts will have to be deleted due to political correctness....How will firing the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics because a bad economic report comes out impact future reporting? If the agency becomes subject to political pressure, future reports or other key economic indicators could lose credibility. A loss of trust could take years to restore. This seems a little crazy. When the USA suffers a bad economic report, we fire the messenger? How does that correct the issue?
Ostrich with Head in Sand...
It won't mean exodus, only 'political correctness ' ... at least.Don't go there. You don't want this thread shut down and another exodus from ASR, do you?
I wonder if historically there were any governments where blind obedience was the greatest virtue... or personal honor was purely based on loyalty.It won't mean exodus, only 'political correctness ' ... at least.
Where has all this come to ....
None that lasted.I wonder if historically there were any governments where blind obedience was the greatest virtue... or personal honor was purely based on loyalty.