Different point.
The analogy was correct for the point I was actually making.
I was addressing the idea of somebody telling somebody else “ There’s a better way to do that. Why don’t you use it instead?”
In which such a suggestion seems to ignore what the person may be enjoying out of their chosen method.
So it’s like a photographer coming up to somebody sitting in front of an easel in the park, carefully painting a tree in front of her, and the photographer says “ If you want to capture the image of that tree why don’t you just take a photograph? It’s more accurate and less hassle.” (“and if you want, you can add a filter afterwards to get the effect you want.”)
Clearly that photographer is not taking into account what the painter is getting out of her chosen activity. Surely she knows about photographs, but has chosen to paint instead. It might not be as accurate, but putting her own bit of flourish on the image is part of the point. Or even if she was indulging in photo realistic painting, taking a photograph instead still wouldn’t fill all the things she gets out of painting. She likes using paint brushes, likes working with paints, the effort it takes to paint… some of the very features the photographer may find a time-consuming hassle the painter enjoys.
In other words, individuals like doing things different ways.
This is what I’ve had to point out many times when people keep suggesting “ why don’t you just use a fully neutral system and add an equalizer or some sort of DSP plug-in?”
Because that’s not the same experience as what I get out of using a tube amp.