- Thread Starter
- #41
WTF? Are you an AI!?!?
Oops. It's because I'm using AI to translate and write. This stupid AI gave me a strange answer. I'm good at reading English, but not so good at writing it!
Last edited:
WTF? Are you an AI!?!?
I 100% agree with you. Just because something looks good doesn't mean it sounds good. Also, many people think incorrect sound is correct. While I respect personal preferences, it's too much. Especially, there are too many people who think a system with a lot of bass and loud noise is a good system.Hi fi simply means high fidelity....which is relatively common now. You kinda have to go out of your way to find crappy stuff. More expensive or better looking amps don't mean they sound better. Hopefully an amp has no sound at all, that's the point.
For speakers sure, not dent to well measuring amps and DAC's. I've already provided a link to a well measuring amp that has plenty of power, as have others.
Yeah, looking a little dodgy at this point;
View attachment 433653
JSmith
Dynacord L2800FD 2x650, 2.2 KW bridged. PEQ & FIR, deacent performance and bargaining price (1000~1500 $/€).
Thank you for your response.The era of big imposing amplifiers is over when you can get similar or better performance for a fraction of a price with a hypex or purify amplifier.
I have listened to mine all day and they barely get warm if at all.
Buckeye
Hypex NCx500 2-Channel
$995.00BUY NOW
Power
- 700 watts @ 2 ohm
- 700 watts @ 4 ohm
- 380 watts @ 8 ohm
- (per channel, 1kHz, 1% THD)
Fidelity
- S/N: 128dB
- FR: 0 - 75KHz
- THD: 0.0006% (350W, 4Ω, 20Hz-20kHz)
I don't live in the United States. So I can't take advantage of the good conditions you mentioned.Where are you?
I'm in the US and a wide range of options, some quite budget friendly. You generally pay for the "high end" via marketing, aesthetics before any peformance advantage
What is a monobloc amp that isn't 1ch? How does that work or is that a bad translation or something?
Multich reviews of what/means what? Sounds like nonsense at this point.
Aesthetics, meh...don't stare at my gear
Based on what?
Thank you for your recommendation!Accuphase has one that does 900W into 2ohm
Luxman has one that does 1.2kW into 1ohm
Check their website for details. Good luck with your amplifier shopping!
They have world-class service and support. The reliability is the main reason I own them.Bryston amplifiers are great! I remember they produced quite good sound. Thank you for the recommendation.
Is it true that Bryston amplifiers have a 20-year warranty? I didn't know that.
However, the importer in my region will probably only provide a 1-year warranty.
No matter how long the manufacturer's warranty period is, most brands here only offer a 1-year warranty.
I think if you care about resale value you should go for McIntosh... Lots of juice, clean by all accounts, and they hold their value well.
I think they're overpriced, but if you're looking at total cost of ownership they may be the cheapest option in your price range.
I will also join in suggesting you go for some powerful modern class D stuff (Nord, audiophonics) and put the extra $$ towards the speakers. You can get 2x500 really clean watts for a fraction of your budget. If they don't last or you can't sell them, you're still looking at a smaller loss than buying McIntosh new and selling later.
Or just forget separates, stop fooling around, and get Genelec 8381s.. Studio speakers that even most studios can't afford....
They have world-class service and support. The reliability is the main reason I own them.
They are transparent. I have the older ST series, several models. Perhaps the only area they might have audible artifacts is a very high efficiency compression driver. Otherwise they are powerful amplifiers with no sonic signature at all. Most good amps share this characteristic: they impart no sound, just amplify.
It might be good to read up on my favorite amplifier test:
Nobody can tell the difference between amps such as a Julius Futterman OTL-1 and a Levinson and a Pioneer receiver.
I was selling high end audio when this article came out, including Levinson, and a host of other brands and the inability of golden eared audio people to pick hear amp differences didn't surprise me. I had already convinced myself that not a single member of our staff, none of our customers, none of the many industry pros who came through the store, could tell the difference between an Audio Research and a Niles commercial install amp. Niles were great amps, we installed them in SeaTac airport food court and they were able to handle any load all while doing what a good amp does, amplify the signal.Actually there was one area where the Niles sounded better than many other amps, even expensive ones, it was stability into low impedances. They could actually drive a first-generation Infinity Kappa for example.
So after my run in sales, seeing so many customers unhappy with their odd sounding speakers and fragile electronics, and knowing amps really don't make much of a difference, I got Bryston gear. One of the distinguishing features of audio is unreliability, as I stated before that is one of my main criteria. Electronics can be made reliable, but it isn't much of a driving factor in high-end home audio. In fact, at times the opposite. There are other brands and models that I am sure have equivalent quality and reliability to Bryston, but they aren't going to sound any different, unless they have performance flaws.
edit: fixed a sentence
Class D state-of-the-art has gotten a lot better in the past 5-10 years. The old problems have been minimized and in measurable performance they beat many good Class-A designs, but at a much lower cost / weight. If you decide to simply go for clean power, they are worth looking into in 2025.I just learned about Nord and Audiophonics amplifiers for the first time. I'll check their specs and performance carefully.
I was looking more for AB amplifiers or A amplifiers rather than Class D amplifiers.
In the end, a good speaker is a good speaker. It can be a matter of taste, but many things about good studio or home speakers will always be held in common. When they are measured on a Klippel, the best home speakers behave like the best studio speakers. So, if you want the absolute best sound you should consider studio speakers. After all, it will provide "what they heard in the studio", which some consider ideal.I don't know much about studio speakers. I've listened to many hi-fi and high-end speakers.
Class D state-of-the-art has gotten a lot better in the past 5-10 years. The old problems have been minimized and in measurable performance they beat many good Class-A designs, but at a much lower cost / weight. If you decide to simply go for clean power, they are worth looking into in 2025.
In the end, a good speaker is a good speaker. It can be a matter of taste, but many things about good studio or home speakers will always be held in common. When they are measured on a Klippel, the best home speakers behave like the best studio speakers. So, if you want the absolute best sound you should consider studio speakers. After all, it will provide "what they heard in the studio", which some consider ideal.
Of course looks also matter and the 8381 will not compliment every decor. But something to think about.
If you want to engage with us, please stop using AI to translate your text. Use a translator. ASR has a policy about AI chats, and I am very close to pushing the report button. I'll give you a bit of leeway because you are new, you don't know the policy, and for now I am assuming you are here to ask questions in good faith.
www.audiosciencereview.com