• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Arcam PA240 / Anthem MCA225 II / Parasound A21+ ?

itzhak1969

New Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2024
Messages
4
Likes
0
I consider changing my current power amp McIntosh MC 152 which I use about 8 years for now . I reduced my options to the 3 bellow :


Arcam PA240
Anthem MCA225 II
Parasound A21+


I currently changed my pre amplifier from the digital pre McIntosh D100 to the Cyrus Pre XR and I think also to change my current MC 152 power , my dealer just received a used pair
of Cyrus mono X300 Signature ( in excellent condition like new ) but I think I can do better with one of the 3 options above .

What do you think ?
 
The McIntosh equipment is at least as good as some of the options you’re considering. What are you expecting to improve upon?
 
I am not sure the upgrade is necessary , maybe more power ? improve in the sound quality ?
The upgrade from McIntosh D100 to the Cyrus Pre XR gave some improvement to the sound more refinement ,transparency much clear highs I thought maybe
changing the power amp as well will improve it further but I am not sure .
 
I have been using the Anthem MCA225 II for 3 years now, excellent sound and looks.

I would have purchased the McIntosh MC 152 but it was out of my price range.

Ohms
 
I am not sure the upgrade is necessary , maybe more power ? improve in the sound quality ?
The upgrade from McIntosh D100 to the Cyrus Pre XR gave some improvement to the sound more refinement ,transparency much clear highs I thought maybe
changing the power amp as well will improve it further but I am not sure .
The distortion on the McIntosh MC152, whilst not truly state of the art, is nevertheless very low and is unlikely to be audible. So the question arises do you need more power? A reasonable way of understanding if this is the case is to listen to music, perhaps a little louder than you find comfortable, and see if you can hear amplifier distortion caused by clipping in the power amplifier output. No clipping and you probably don’t need more power.
If you are considering a new power amplifier then it is sensible to consider the best of the class D amplifiers using Purifi modules - the best of them are less expensive and outperform the amplifiers on your list.
 
No clipping or distortion at all even at very high level volume with my McIntosh MC152.
"If you are considering a new power amplifier then it is sensible to consider the best of the class D amplifiers using Purifi modules - the best of them are less expensive and outperform the amplifiers on your list."- such as ?
 
Last edited:
No clipping or distortion att all even at very high level volume with my McIntosh MC152.
"If you are considering a new power amplifier then it is sensible to consider the best of the class D amplifiers using Purifi modules - the best of them are less expensive and outperform the amplifiers on your list."- such as ?
If you possess top notch loudspeakers, such as Revel Salon 2 of KEF Blade meta (be careful here many/most equally or more expensive speakers aren’t as good as these) and you have set up your listening room well and perhaps you’ve used room equalisation then we may be moving to the point that slightly better results may be achieved with amplifiers other than the McIntosh MC152. But you don’t notice any lack of power from the MC152 amplifier so that isn’t the issue.
The Purifi modules are used by a number of amplifier builders. Naming just a few quality builders (there are others) consider BoXem if you’re in Europe, Buckeye in N. America and March Audio in Australia. All these builders take quality seriously. If you want a mainstream manufacturer who has adopted Purifi then consider NAD, although I believe that they use their own variant of the Purifi circuits under licence (Nothing wrong with that - they do a good job).

Purifi now make 3 different modules
1. 1ET400. 225W into 8 Ohms. Can drive full voltage into 3 Ohms
2. 1ET7040. Marginally more power into 8 Ohms but very robust in driving low impedance speakers down to 2 Ohms (950W -depending on power supply used)
3. 1ET9040. Brand new. 400 Watts into 8 Ohms and depending on power supply, perhaps 1400 watts into 2 Ohms. Arguably the best amplifier in terms of performance on the market. No 9040 based amplifiers have been reviewed by @amirm yet. Somebody who was cautious might wish to wait . . .
Now the interesting thing about these amplifiers is their price/performance ratio. March Audio sell the monoblock 9040 based amplifier (you need 2 of them for stereo) P801 at $2027 + shipping + taxes. This is substantially less any high performance Class AB amplifier and is something of a game changer.
All of these Purifi based amplifiers will sound the same right up to the point when the amplifier approaches voltage or current limiting. Their sound is essentially ‘neutral’ since they just amplify and and do not distort so don’t expect the warm, fuzzy sound of a low feedback amplifier. Even still will they sound noticeably better than your MC152 which is pretty neutral? Probably not!

EDIT:typo
 
Last edited:
No clipping or distortion att all even at very high level volume with my McIntosh MC152.
Then you don't need more power.

Expect the biggest improvements in sound quality by using room EQ or getting better speakers. If you have money to spare go this way.
 
Back
Top Bottom