• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Arcam AV40 AV Processor Review

Dimifoot

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 27, 2019
Messages
506
Likes
746
Location
Greece
Is it actually fixed?
Check their users forum in avsforum.com

You will find AP measurements after the firmware update, and other stability fixes that were presented by the company some weeks ago, maybe 10-15days after @amirm review.
 

Bjorn

Major Contributor
Audio Company
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 22, 2017
Messages
1,286
Likes
2,562
Location
Norway
I'm starting to think ASR should design and produce our own AV processor.

We must have enough in house expertise, could it be any worse ?
A way to get around this and make it very affordable would be to design a multichannel DAC and team up with Jriver (for decoding, EQ, etc). I know that there have been some attempts to this or several (me included) have been using a sound card like Lynx etc. but all these have had their limits and missing important aspects. While such a product wouldn't satisfy everyone, I think this is the better approach in order to keep cost down and avoid licenses.
 

Krobar

Active Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2019
Messages
208
Likes
112
A way to get around this and make it very affordable would be to design a multichannel DAC and team up with Jriver (for decoding, EQ, etc). I know that there have been some attempts to this or several (me included) have been using a sound card like Lynx etc. but all these have had their limits and missing important aspects. While such a product wouldn't satisfy everyone, I think this is the better approach in order to keep cost down and avoid licenses.

The OKTO Dac8 Pro that was well reviewed here is a potential option if you only need 7.X (No Atmos or DTS:X) and then use the Dirac PC software for Room Correction and other software to sort bass management. I looked at this back in November but there is a lack of overhead audio decoding and nice upmixing options when processing only with a PC.

Looks like there is a premade solution to add digital SPDIF output to the Oppo Players:
https://audiopraise.com/docs/vanityhd_settings_english.pdf
 
Last edited:

Krobar

Active Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2019
Messages
208
Likes
112
Obviously this was designed first and foremost to give dealers something with a good markup. Then end user? As pitiful spec-wise as it is, if the goal is to blow up a Death Star in a living room then my guess is that most buyers won't care.

Why anyone might want to spend four and a half large when a much cheaper home theater receiver would do the trick for them is something I don't understand. DIRAC? OK. But a top of the line NAD AV receiver has that for two thousand dollars less. Sure, NAD doesn't look as nice, but the knob on the front panel will be placed in the usual spot, so it's got that going for it.

For me I run a 7.2.6 (CH & VOG) setup so NAD and most others wont support this setup. Given what I know now I would cut back to 7.2.4 and select something else although ultimately it seems to be room correction that makes the biggest difference.
 

LTig

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 27, 2019
Messages
5,760
Likes
9,442
Location
Europe
I'm starting to think ASR should design and produce our own AV processor.

We must have enough in house expertise, could it be any worse ?
May be easier to add SPDIF outputs to a Marantz AV7705 or similar AVP. Are there chips which transform I2S into SPDIF?
 

QMuse

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 20, 2020
Messages
3,124
Likes
2,785
It would be nice to see that one put through its paces here. The field of viable candidates is quickly narrowing in this category, sadly.

Here you can find pretty detailed review of it's predecessor RSP-1572 (which had slightly worse specs) done by @Kal Rubinson so maybe he can chime in with his impressions.
 

jam

Active Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2020
Messages
123
Likes
258
Location
Montreal
Another self annointed giant falls to its knees under Amir's relentless and just scrutiny. Thank you Amir for another eye opener. I had very high hopes for this one. I am left dumbfounded and speechless. Unfortunately, as far as I'm concerned, Arcam has lost all its credibility as a Hi-Fi brand. What is Harman/Samsung doing to this ounce venerable brand?
 
OP
amirm

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
44,368
Likes
234,386
Location
Seattle Area
I think high-end processor companies call themselves lucky just to get to the finish line with a million different features and formats working together. It doesn't seem to be a priority on top of that to meet any kind of audio spec since that has not been a visible thing in the eyes of consumers.
 

jam

Active Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2020
Messages
123
Likes
258
Location
Montreal
I think you hit ithe nail right on the head Amir. With so many formats and features that consumers have been lead to believe they need, and the cost in R&D associated with integrating succesfully all those bells & whistles, many companies have stopped paying attention to the basics, actual SQ and performance.
 

jam

Active Member
Joined
Feb 28, 2020
Messages
123
Likes
258
Location
Montreal
Claiming all that on record without blushing, now that's "performance".
Yeah, I saw that Audioholics YouTube video of Arcam's new product introductions a few months back. Well... they are in the entertainment industry after all. :)
 

tecnogadget

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
May 21, 2018
Messages
558
Likes
1,011
Location
Madrid, Spain
This is killing me. The waiting is getting too far.

I've been dreaming since 2017 for any device at a reasonable price that connects to the Blu Ray player, be it an AVR or just AV Processor, to show up here with good objective performance to call it "transparent" for lossless multichannel and at the same time apply Dirac.

Its 2020 and still has not shown up. I had high hopes for this new Arcam line, I simply did not expect this considering the brand reputation and exorbitant price. One would think there must be some way they can back it up, and the only way should be performance.

It looks like what I'm looking for just does not exist :facepalm::p.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jam

capitanharlock

Active Member
Joined
May 17, 2019
Messages
111
Likes
94
Gosh, same for me, I was hoping to buy the Arcam, but now I definitely changed my mind.
Terrible measurements, and on top of that tons of fw bugs.
And that display, come on, so ‘80s...
I will revert back to a 2 Channel plus sub Dirac live solution for my active Genelec 1038.
 

stunta

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Messages
1,155
Likes
1,399
Location
Boston, MA
This is killing me. The waiting is getting too far.

I've been dreaming since 2017 for any device at a reasonable price that connects to the Blu Ray player, be it an AVR or just AV Processor, to show up here with good objective performance to call it "transparent" for lossless multichannel and at the same time apply Dirac.

Its 2020 and still has not shown up. I had high hopes for this new Arcam line, I simply did not expect this considering the brand reputation and exorbitant price. One would think there must be some way they can back it up, and the only way should be performance.

It looks like what I'm looking for just does not exist :facepalm::p.

This is why I went with something that's B-stock (Integra), is relatively inexpensive and has the features I need. TBH, with movies and TV shows I really am not sure if I would be able to tell the difference between this and a processor that measures well. I have no interest in multi-channel audio. For 2-channel music, a well-measuring cheap external DAC does the trick.
 

GXAlan

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 15, 2020
Messages
3,867
Likes
5,953
If you follow AVSForum, you can see that one of the bugs in 1.28 with the SDP-55 is that "the center channel disappears when Dirac is enabled and listening to an Atmos track."

I'm starting to think ASR should design and produce our own AV processor.
We must have enough in house expertise, could it be any worse ?

The real question is if we can convince ATI to manufacture a higher priced HTP-1 Pro for higher-end performance and perhaps a 11.2 budget version. They've shown that they're the only company that seems to have some reasonable engineering and is responsive to user forums/boards. Could be a kickstarter with some guaranteed pre-orders.

I think high-end processor companies call themselves lucky just to get to the finish line with a million different features and formats working together. It doesn't seem to be a priority on top of that to meet any kind of audio spec since that has not been a visible thing in the eyes of consumers.

It seems as if Sony STR-ZA1100ES and Denon AVR-X3600H and Pioneer LX504 actually do respectably given their price. Everyone likes to say how the "mass market" brands aren't audiophile brands, yet they have higher levesl of reliability and measure far better "audiophile" brands like NAD or Arcam.

Another self annointed giant falls to its knees under Amir's relentless and just scrutiny. Thank you Amir for another eye opener. I had very high hopes for this one. I am left dumbfounded and speechless. Unfortunately, as far as I'm concerned, Arcam has lost all its credibility as a Hi-Fi brand. What is Harman/Samsung doing to this ounce venerable brand?

The AVR390 which is pre-Harman buyout is pretty bad too. I think the core skillset behind Arcam's Class G amplification is completely separate from the digital front end. Hopefully Sound United realizes that they would make a killing providing the digital front end for other companies to rebrand (and expand their HEOS line).
 
Top Bottom