• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Apollon 1ET6525SA ST Amplifier Review

Rate this amplifier:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 1 0.4%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 32 12.1%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 232 87.5%

  • Total voters
    265
Cool, I stand corrected, thanks! ... so that means one can rate their power amps at any distortion level that must not exceed 1%, correct?
This change just happened in the 2024 revision, and it was prompted by a comment from our friend Dennis Murphy of Philharmonic Audio :)

For the 1% THD+N change, see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: III. Analysis of SNPRM Comments and Rule Amendments
For Dennis' comment, see footnotes 21
https://www.federalregister.gov/doc...for-amplifiers-utilized-in-home-entertainment
 
This change just happened in the 2024 revision, and it was prompted by a comment from our friend Dennis Murphy of Philharmonic Audio :)

For the 1% THD+N change, see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: III. Analysis of SNPRM Comments and Rule Amendments
For Dennis' comment, see footnotes 21
https://www.federalregister.gov/doc...for-amplifiers-utilized-in-home-entertainment
What does Dennis mean that many tube and SS amps cannot meet the 0.1% THD requirement??? I'm confused since I've seen these specs for years.

1771085056146.png
 
What does Dennis mean that many tube and SS amps cannot meet the 0.1% THD requirement??? I'm confused since I've seen these specs for years.

View attachment 511067
For example, this amplifier would have zero output if 0.1% THD+N (-60 dB) is used as the limit. So they want the spec to be more lenient so some of these "audiophile" tube amps are eligible for an FCC power rating.

index.php
 
What a ridiculous amplifier, if I may say so!
We need to recognize that the "ASR views" are not universally shared. Government regulations (after all, if it is in the CFR, it is US federal regulatory law) should try to keep the majority happy, and should be relevant to the majority. In terms of audibility of distortions and suitability for home entertainment use, IMHO a 1% THD+N limit is more defensible than a 0.1% limit.
 
Hah hah, what a joke! "Let's lower our standards so even audiophiles can pass!" I might be strict, but in my opinion being strict is better than that :D

@Jukka, I'm curious ... where would you place the knee for the 9040BA module power curve below for 8 ohms (black line)? From your reasoning, perhaps at 200W, where the distortion starts to rise? Or 300W or 400W, where it definitely shoots up to the skies? BTW, Purifi rates this module at 375W into 8R at 0.1% or -60dB THD+N. As I explained earlier, this is industry standard, and the FCC has not changed it, as far as I can tell. In fact, a manufacturer is free to rate their amp at any distortion level. Purifi would also be correct if they rated their 9040BA module at 200W with -130dB THD+N or 300W with -125dB THD+N. But that would be 'wasteful' and unrepresentative of the true performance of the module.

View attachment 511010

Also, a slight correction to a statement you made: "Harmonic distortion does not, however, make the fundamental (original input signal) any louder (except for H1, if there is such a thing)."

When you look at a 100W (~28.3Vrms into 8 ohms) waveform on the scope at -130dB THD+N, it will be clean. Increasing the power to 200W (40Vrms) or 300W(~50Vrms) at higher distortion levels, the primary waveform amplitude (H1 in this case) will linearly increase and will continue to do so at 200W or 300W. By the time it reaches 375W in this case, the input voltage amplitude will not cause a proportional change in the voltage output, but H1 will continue to increase along with higher harmonic products, just not at the rate as the input (and you'll still see a clean looking voltage waveform on the scope) ... until it just stops increasing when its peak voltage waveform is equal to the module rail voltage (typically +/- 46VDC for this module). Then, a rounded sine wave results, as I explained in my earlier post.

Good and interesting back-and-forth, @Jukka :) !
I'd say the black line has ~350-375 Watts. I do allow some wiggle there, so it's hard to tell where the actual knee starts. Some amps and some frequencies have rising "normal" distortion when power increases, so the knee is not as pronounced. Maybe the measurement equipment can pinpoint it with higher accuracy, they should know when it's not producing higher voltage.

About H1 and terminology. H1 is the first harmonic of the fundamental (F), it is the same frequency as the F, but it's not F itself. H2 is 2 times frequency of F and so on. I do not know for sure if H1 is a real thing, but I guess it could show up as higher/lower than expected level of F and it could have some phase shift. I don't think Amir has a test in his current test suite that would bring this out, if there is such a thing that is. Are you talking about the same thing?

Okey so near peak voltage output the output doesn't fully follow the input signal in rms rise rate? Technically that could be opposite phase H1 distortion or just simple side effect of "about to run out of juice". But if it's not linear, it's not normal nor good, and could be labeled as (harmonic or non-harmonic) distortion or maybe noise. Simply eye-balling a scope would not tell much until the distortion is very high with these high SINAD devices. That's why analysis devices are needed. I would love to hear from someone with actual measurement data from the edge of amplifier peak power and could show us how the voltage swing and distortion develops near the peak voltage output.

I'm happy to share my thoughts in constructive spirit, thanks @David_M !
 
About H1 and terminology. H1 is the first harmonic of the fundamental (F), it is the same frequency as the F, but it's not F itself.
I've never heard of such a definition. And frankly, it doesn't make sense to me. This would just be equivalent to a non-linear frequency response.
 
This amplifier uses Hypex SMPS1200 power supplies, and has an in-rush current spec of 37 A max. The SMPS has a 12 A slow blow fuse (i.e. over-current protection of 12 A), and therefore components in the AC supply should be rated for at least 12 A continuous.
View attachment 510069
It looks like they put a 10 Ohm NTC thermistor at the input to limit inrush current. Worst case is going to be based on the 264VAC input (373V peak). 373V/10 Ohms~ 37A. With 132V input the max inrush should be about 19A. At 115VAC the peak inrush will be about 16A.

I see a lot of people on some other forums buying the cheapest power supplies they can find on Ali-express to power their Fosi and Aiyima amps. Good luck with that!
 
Hello guys, I want to order this amplifier, but I have some questions, are there any coupon codes available? also will there be any tariffs to US?
Thanks
 
Keep in my guys total price = 1497€ including Vat + shipment (see attached file) for Europe only and $ 2500 for USA !!!

US alternative = VTV @ $ 1150

Is this true? LOL, I was going to order this, and I am in US, but I guess I will have to buy the buckeye or the vtv unit, however the apollonaudio unit looks so nice, and has so many adjustable gain options, too bad we have a moron in charge of running the country.
 
Last edited:

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2026-03-04 at 11.22.06.png
    Screenshot 2026-03-04 at 11.22.06.png
    369.5 KB · Views: 40
Last edited:
Please check the actual price before posting misinformation.

My bad )) Just saw I put 2 items in my shopping cart. Sorry amigos

BTW just saw that Apollon updated their pictures.
 

Attachments

  • Capture+_2026-03-04-13-08-38.png
    Capture+_2026-03-04-13-08-38.png
    2.4 MB · Views: 61
Hi all
Wanted to order the monoblocks 1ET6525 in the Lux version, but then I noticed that the OPamp option cost twice as much as in the "normal" monoblock version...Do you know if there is a reason for that ? I don't think Apollon is using twice more OpAmp in the Lux version....
Thanks a lot in advance !
 
Hi all
Wanted to order the monoblocks 1ET6525 in the Lux version, but then I noticed that the OPamp option cost twice as much as in the "normal" monoblock version...Do you know if there is a reason for that ? I don't think Apollon is using twice more OpAmp in the Lux version....
Thanks a lot in advance !
Thank you for noticing this and for pointing it out.

This was simply a bug on our website that caused the OPamp option in the Lux monoblock configuration to appear at twice the intended price. There is no technical reason for the difference, and the Lux version does not use twice as many op-amps.

The issue has now been corrected on our website.

Thanks again for bringing this to our attention, we really appreciate it.
 
Thanks ! That's a good news ! Just wondering if I take the Sparkos option now that it has decreased by half... ;)
Depends on whether you’re ordering it because you want an audible difference. If you’re after an audible difference, you’re wasting your money. If you’re buying it for a different reason, go ahead.
 
I am curious, what made you 2 order this Apollon amp with the Purifi 1ET6525SA instead of the Hypex NCx500?
 
I plugged a consumption meter onto the power cord. This amp, my unit, consumes about 16.5 W when idle. It needs to get very loud, hearing damage levels of loud before the base consumption is exceeded with my subwoofers. For comparison I measured 28.6 Watts from two NC400 mono blocks.
 
Back
Top Bottom