• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Anthem MRX1140 AVR Review

Rate this AVR:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 6 3.4%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 55 30.9%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 100 56.2%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 17 9.6%

  • Total voters
    178

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
48,907
Likes
287,419
Location
Seattle Area
This is a review and detailed measurements of the Anthem MRX1140 11.2 channel Home Theater AV Receiver (AVR). It is on kind loan from a member and costs US $4199.
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver high-end review.jpg

MRX1140 maintains the highly functional and bright display which nicely distinguishes it from mass market AV products. It sports a very easy to use and fast web interface which is what I used to control it. I am happy to see NO legacy inputs on the back panel:
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver high-end back panel review.jpg


Prior to testing, I attempted to update the firmware. Using the front panel interface, it would check but offer nothing for upgrade. Using the web interface, it nicely gave me the option to update which I allowed. For testing, I set it to just 2 channel output with or without 1 sub enabled (see below).

Peering inside, I see nice extruded aluminum heat sink for the power amplifier. While it was quite warm at the end of testing, not once did it shut down. I don't think I have seen an AVR this robust.

The unit is also relatively light, making it easy to carry to our loft where my lab is.

Anthem MRX1140 DAC Measurements
I initially tested the unit with just left and right fronts enabled and sub turned off -- how I test all AV products:
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR DAC Measurement.png


Then I remembered something the company representative had told me. That for some internal reason, if you don't enable subwoofer, it costs you 10 dB of performance. He was right:
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR DAC subwoofer On Measurement.png


This nicely lands the unit in upper tier of all AV products tested:
Best home theater surround multichannel reciever AVR atmos review.png


For reasons I don't understand, Toslink produced slightly less performance:
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR DAC subwoofer On Toslink Measure...png

I measured this because I can use Toslink to perform sweeps whereas I can't with HDMI. So as you see the follow up measurements, consider that they would likely be a hair better with HDMI.

Here is the distortion sweep with volume set to max:
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR DAC subwoofer On Toslink THD vs ...png

With ability to go up to 3.2 volt, you should be able to use fairly powerful external amps. But note that the internal amplifier cannot be disabled.

Dynamic range was quite good for this class:
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR DAC subwoofer On Toslink DNR Mea...png


IMD test results are again, good for the category. There are some wiggles towards the end though. I am guessing it is the amplifier pushing max power.

Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR DAC subwoofer On Toslink IMD dis...png


50 Hertz stereophile results is excellent in one channel but fairly worse in the other:
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR DAC subwoofer On 50 Hz stereophi...png


Jitter test shows internal interference regardless of input used:
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR DAC subwoofer On Jitter Measurem...png


I had trouble running linearity test as the unit would not produce any output. I then remembered that some AV products mute with this type of signal. Indeed, that was the case here:
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR DAC subwoofer On Toslink Lineari...png

From what I recall, it is a hack to enable playback for some Apple products but don't remember precisely.

The reconstruction filter has poor attenuation above 24 kHz:
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR DAC subwoofer On Toslink Filter ...png


Which naturally causes problem with wideband, 48 kHz noise+distortion test:
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR DAC subwoofer On Toslink THD vs ...png

Using a higher sample rate pushes that noise further out and becomes a non problem.

Frequency response is good:
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR DAC subwoofer On Toslink frequen...png


Anthem MRX1140 Amplifier Test:
I set the gain to 25 dB and used RCA input for the dashboard:
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR Amplifier subwoofer On Measurement.png


I then switched to Toslink which resulted in lower noise and better performance (as it should but doesn't always):
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR Amplifier subwoofer On Toslink M...png


I went round and round with input level and volume setting and that is about the results you get. This is good but I wished was better:
Best home theater surround amplifier review.png


Frequency response using RCA showed digitization at 96 kHz which is good compared to many that do so at 44.1/48 kHz:
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR Amplifier subwoofer On RCA Frequ...png


Response is fair bit improved by using Toslink and eliminating the path through ADC:
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR Amplifier subwoofer On Toslink f...png


Multitone test shows typical rise in distortion with frequency:
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR Amplifier subwoofer On Toslink M...png


Which you can see reflected in 19+20 kHz:
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR Amplifier subwoofer On Toslink 1...png


Using Toslink again we get nice power sweeps:
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR Amplifier subwoofer On Toslink P...png

Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR Amplifier subwoofer On Toslink P...png


I could only run my max power test. With burst, distortion would never rise to 1% no matter how much I pushed the amp. I wonder if there an internal limiter:
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR Amplifier subwoofer On Toslink P...png


40 Hz power was respectable:
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR Amplifier subwoofer On Toslink P...png


Here is the full spectrum test:
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR Amplifier subwoofer On Toslink P...png


That should say "no power" loss. :)

The channel AB amplifier is very well behaved and shows classic response:
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR Amplifier subwoofer On Toslink P...png


I did not test Anthem Room EQ here but I have in my theater with their processor. If the MRX1140 implements the same, I expect excellent performance.

Conclusions
Grading on the AV curve, the DAC performance is very good to excellent. Amplifier is average for the class. User interface and look of the unit is well above average. There are flaws here and there but that is hard to escape in AV products. Hopefully refinement comes in the future.

I am going to recommend the Anthem MRX1140.

P.S. OK, I am exhausted testing this AVR. :) Having to test three different inputs and variations I am not showing, was a ton of work!
------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Appreciate any donations using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
 
Thanks for this very thorough review, Amir. I always feel sticker shock when I read any of these AVR reviews. Imagine $4k+for a component comprised of multiple DAC and Amplifier channels with all those individual DACS and amps performing at a level which would earn them headless panthers if they were evaluated as standalone components in today's marketplace. But that's the world of these receivers function in, and, by that standard, the Anthem seems to be among the best of its kind.

So, for anyone who wants a home theater capable to rendering Atmos, DTS-X, and Auro 3D soundtracks, the Anthem offers 7.2.4 layout capability with what should be reasonably transparent sound. All this presupposes the company provides a consistently reliable product, and a responsive service function which is sometimes not the case with offerings of this complexity made with mass market components. But, because of the way these Atmos rendering machines are marketed, something like this receiver is really almost the only alternative for Dolby Atmos and the other object oriented Codecs in a home audio setting. So this may be as good a place to make the home theater leap as any. Just watch out for any rocks in the landing zone.
 
In those 5 W amp tests, RCA vs. Toslink, not sure I'd want to trade lower noise for higher harmonics, e.g. HD3 -98 vs. -83 dB - yikes! Note how the DAC with Toslink input is capable of -105 dB or better HD3, so they must be overdriving some analog preamp stage at 5 W already.

Yeah, the amp seems to be class AB, has competent performance at 1 kHz but is running out of gain bandwidth for higher frequencies, but not as badly as some popular class D amps.
 
I havent read more than the first few lines but.....

NO LEGACY CONNECTIONS!!

I don't care if the rest of it is crap, if the THD is minus 50DB and it doesnt work with HDMI connections etc etc

No legacy connections - I WANT ONE!
 
All of them!

They are utterly pointless and just add further complcation to an already complicated and compromised product - due to all the things "we" expect it to do.
I guarantee a stack of people will say "but I like a tuner or I have a legacy XYZ device that needs component input etc etc " but overall they are now very much in the minority.

Flame suit on!
 
Thanks for the very thorough testing Amir, that's really appreciated.
As soon as I started reading, I had high hopes for the Anthem, and all the way through I was hoping to see a THDN vs Power vs Frequency.
I think that's the undoing of a lot of products - good performance at 1kHz / 1W / 1% etc, but audibly falls apart elsewhere.
The Anthem looked quite good, but the noise disguised the distortion to some extent. THDN at 10kHz gets down to -65dB and stays there. :confused:
Here's the Anthem followed by the Denon X8500H, which is a decent yardstick, but much the same. The Compromised JBL SDR35 was wonderful however:

1762248070155.png
1762248086323.png
1762248108243.png
 
The Anthem looked quite good, but the noise disguised the distortion to some extent. THDN at 10kHz gets down to -65dB and stays there. :confused:
You made me think I should have run that test with Toslink. Amplifier distortion would not change but noise level would have been lower.
 
Anthem MRX1140 DAC Measurements
I initially tested the unit with just left and right fronts enabled and sub turned off -- how I test all AV products:
Anthem MRX1140 Home Theater Surround Dolby Atmos Receiver AVR DAC Measurement.png


Then I remembered something the company representative had told me. That for some internal reason, if you don't enable subwoofer, it costs you 10 dB of performance. He was right
Does this means that I can add 10 more DB of SINAD for my Yamaha V-6A?
Come now,I need some free SINAD :facepalm:
SINAD Yunky here:)))
 
Last edited:
Then I remembered something the company representative had told me. That for some internal reason, if you don't enable subwoofer, it costs you 10 dB of performance. He was right:

Amir, if that is true then would you think logically speaking the same would have applied to the AVM70, that you reviewed and despite that is an AV preamp/processor with much better ESS DAC chips vs the 1140's? It is important to know because if the same applies the to the AVM70, then your measured 99 dB SINAD could have been higher if the subwoofers were enabled. The AVM90 measured about 105 dB so I wonder if it would have still done better too. Can you think of any reasons for the 10 dB difference between subwoofers enabled/disabled, that seems too strange!
 
Thanks for the very thorough testing Amir, that's really appreciated.
As soon as I started reading, I had high hopes for the Anthem, and all the way through I was hoping to see a THDN vs Power vs Frequency.
I think that's the undoing of a lot of products - good performance at 1kHz / 1W / 1% etc, but audibly falls apart elsewhere.
The Anthem looked quite good, but the noise disguised the distortion to some extent. THDN at 10kHz gets down to -65dB and stays there. :confused:
Here's the Anthem followed by the Denon X8500H, which is a decent yardstick, but much the same. The Compromised JBL SDR35 was wonderful however:

View attachment 487765 View attachment 487766 View attachment 487767

Not quite the same, the Denon did much better at low output (below 1 W) level.
 
All of them!

They are utterly pointless and just add further complcation to an already complicated and compromised product - due to all the things "we" expect it to do.
I guarantee a stack of people will say "but I like a tuner or I have a legacy XYZ device that needs component input etc etc " but overall they are now very much in the minority.

Flame suit on!
I do get where you are coming from. If your focus is just on playing HD and 4K content though HDMI to a TV to get your surround sound it is nice to see those older inputs gone as they do add complication and noise. In reality though I use my AVR for more than just watching movies. I'll take distortion I never notice to have a few legacy options. I actually do use the FM tuner, and hook up things to the analog audio inputs. My AVR has no analog video inputs though. I haven't needed those in 15 years.
 
Amir, thanks again for another thorough review.

Is there any reason the minidsp flex is in the first bar chart of AVR home theater products ?
 
Great review. Amir once again knocks it out of the park! Go Amir Go! A good simple AVR is worth its weight in gold. The swiss army knife of the audio world. I also like that they do not have outdated old legacy connections in the back, Bravo!
 
Amir, thanks again for another thorough review.

Is there any reason the minidsp flex is in the first bar chart of AVR home theater products ?

I thought he mentioned the Flex has DSP, so it is something in between. I actually think it belongs there, more so than grouping it with DACs, especially when the Flex is closely related to the Flex HT series, those are of course evenly closer to AVRs/AVPs.
 
Ten years later and 4x the price and it’s still no better than a Denon x3700..
 
Ten years later and 4x the price and it’s still no better than a Denon x3700..

It is better if used as preamp/processor, but it has no preamp mode and the IMD seems a little high for my comfort also, wonder why that is... Also, despite what the AVSF fans claimed (all subjective, no to little graphs to support their claims..), ARC G is quite nice but don't deliver results as good as XT32 SubEQ HT (when apps are used). So I guess you may be right, especially when the higher price is factor in as well.
 
Back
Top Bottom