With due respect, I think we have all waited long enough for the AVM60 re-review. At this point I hope
@amirm can at least feel free to give ASR members some hints/indications, while still following his principle of not publishing the actual test results before hearing back from Anthem who sent him the test unit.
I would suggest the following minimal information (no actual measurements need to be disclosed) should very well preserve the said principle:
- Did the second unit still measured with generally worse results than the AVR version, that is, the MRX-1140.
- If not, were there speculated reasons (example: the first unit is defective, or its testing procedure related etc..) for the abnormal results of the first unit tested?
If Amir still don't feel comfortable saying anything, then that's fine too because then we know, sort of..
Thank you in advance.