wgscott
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 1, 2016
- Messages
- 179
- Likes
- 37
Although I have mostly redbook files, I also have some "higher resolution" files with authentic content beyond 22kHz.
My playback system is a Mac mini connected to a DAC (Teac NT503) via USB. I typically use Dirac Room Correction software, as a plug-in with Audirvana (playback software that allows the use of AU plugins as well as optional up-sampling and filtering. The Dirac AU plug-in can be run in such a way that it is the last to process the signal before being out-put to the DAC.
The room correction target curves (orange) I have generated always have a very steep drop-off around 17 kHz.
(click thumbnail for a bigger pic)
Does this sharp cut-off behave in essentially the same way that a (higher-frequency) redbook brick wall filter would behave, and if so, is it therefore more likely to produce audible aliasing artifacts? Would up-sampling (within the Audirvana playback software), prior to application of this filter, make this worse, or ameliorate aliasing artifacts? Should the window for the filter be adjusted so it only goes up to (say) 15kHz? Note that the actual signal above 10kHz is greatly attenuated to begin with (presumably my speakers and Class D amp are at fault). I can hear (barely) to about 15-16kHz, fwiw; certainly no higher. I am far more worried about the audible range than anything else.
My playback system is a Mac mini connected to a DAC (Teac NT503) via USB. I typically use Dirac Room Correction software, as a plug-in with Audirvana (playback software that allows the use of AU plugins as well as optional up-sampling and filtering. The Dirac AU plug-in can be run in such a way that it is the last to process the signal before being out-put to the DAC.
The room correction target curves (orange) I have generated always have a very steep drop-off around 17 kHz.
(click thumbnail for a bigger pic)
Does this sharp cut-off behave in essentially the same way that a (higher-frequency) redbook brick wall filter would behave, and if so, is it therefore more likely to produce audible aliasing artifacts? Would up-sampling (within the Audirvana playback software), prior to application of this filter, make this worse, or ameliorate aliasing artifacts? Should the window for the filter be adjusted so it only goes up to (say) 15kHz? Note that the actual signal above 10kHz is greatly attenuated to begin with (presumably my speakers and Class D amp are at fault). I can hear (barely) to about 15-16kHz, fwiw; certainly no higher. I am far more worried about the audible range than anything else.
Last edited: