I predict the old codgers at Stereophile are going to lap this speaker up.
Keith
Keith
Just like a kitten to milk. LOLI predict the old codgers at Stereophile are going to lap this speaker up.
Keith
And why did they use titanium before that? It's all about selling loudspeakers. You have to convince the purchaser that the tech has moved forward otherwise they've no incentive to upgrade their old titanium dome Focal to the new Focal.Then why is Focal using Beryllium for years?
And is it any better than a traditional dome?That they used an inverted dome is what actually matters to the sound pattern of the speaker.
Lots of products are - from some manufacturers. Longevity ain’t the best metric for SQ/ $And both is still on the market today
2 Giant magnet structures with 10" cones, 15" equivalent, gap management for long excursion, 160 lb unit and you get down to only 34Hz?
It's his own company, he doesn't need a contract anymoreBlah! Andrew Jones again. Mention his name, and silly little audiophiles wet their pants...
If the guy is so good, why is he always changing jobs? You would think a company would give him a fat contract for a long duration, if he were the God of speaker design many claim he is.
Many of his speakers in many different companies and price points have measured well and gotten great reviews. As veteran of many startups in R&D, I have worked with many talented engineers that find once the the design is going to production with new challenges that require less invention and creation they lose interest. On the other side those charged with high output and lower cost can find those individuals hard to work with because of the compromises they need to make in a design. I have no understanding of Jone's personality and work style but he seems affable in his videos.Blah! Andrew Jones again. Mention his name, and silly little audiophiles wet their pants...
If the guy is so good, why is he always changing jobs? You would think a company would give him a fat contract for a long duration, if he were the God of speaker design many claim he is.
I would have thought it obvious that the loudness achievable over the frequency range will be much greater with bigger more efficient drivers. Whether you need that is a different thing.
Possibly with less distortion too?

That is common audiophile misconception like that for example light membranes correspond more linearly at lower volumes or first tube amp is more dynamic but in the end it is physical laws like Newton's second and linearity measurements of very different tsp parameter drivers never showed such deviations, so it's like for most audio stuff mainly the frequency response tuning plus some parts placebo/expectation due to not doing controlled testing. As in the video the target buyers are low wattage tube owners which have usually also too low output impedance outputs which change the frequency response on every loudspeaker differently due to the different impedance curves so they can play all day randomly combining loudspeakers and amps.For instance I wonder if the AJ speakers wouldn’t require as much volume in order to sound satisfying or dynamically alive or whatever.
Just looks like the effect of a wide angle lens to me.Look at his foot - it's all the way in front of the speaker. And his upper body seems to be behind the speaker. While speaker seems to be at pretty deep. Don't think it is just keystone effect - but have been proven wrong many times before...