Hello all,
I’ve noticed that some manufacturers opt for D-sub (typically DB25) inputs and outputs for space-saving reasons. These are often connected to external equipment using D-sub to XLR breakout cables.
I’m curious—are there any inherent performance differences when using D-sub connectors compared to traditional XLR connections for analogue audio? Specifically, does the more compact nature of the D-sub result in greater crosstalk or signal degradation?
Additionally, since D-sub cables are usually enclosed in some form of multicore cable, could this impact performance as well, perhaps in terms of shielding, interference, or channel separation?
I understand this might be more of a hypothetical question, but I'm wondering: in a direct performance comparison between two otherwise similar devices—one using XLR and the other using D-sub, would the D-sub-equipped unit be at a disadvantage from a signal integrity perspective?
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!
I’ve noticed that some manufacturers opt for D-sub (typically DB25) inputs and outputs for space-saving reasons. These are often connected to external equipment using D-sub to XLR breakout cables.
I’m curious—are there any inherent performance differences when using D-sub connectors compared to traditional XLR connections for analogue audio? Specifically, does the more compact nature of the D-sub result in greater crosstalk or signal degradation?
Additionally, since D-sub cables are usually enclosed in some form of multicore cable, could this impact performance as well, perhaps in terms of shielding, interference, or channel separation?
I understand this might be more of a hypothetical question, but I'm wondering: in a direct performance comparison between two otherwise similar devices—one using XLR and the other using D-sub, would the D-sub-equipped unit be at a disadvantage from a signal integrity perspective?
Looking forward to hearing your thoughts!
