Hi, I'm a newbie and really don't know a lot about audio, but I do love to listen to music and have read a lot of discussion here regarding choices of amplifiers.
Anyway, I currently have a pair of Harbeth C7ES-XD's and a Bluesound Powernode Edge streaming Spotify.
I was interested in looking at other amplifiers and I took my little amp to a local hifi store to listen to it on the same pair of Harbeths versus other amps.
When I listened to my Bluesound amp I thought it sounded good, but I when listened to the same speakers with a Luxman 505Z, I thought it sounded much, much better.
Why is this?
[edited]
Could be that the Harbeth which has an impedance that drops down to 5.6ohm at certain frequencies is not the best load for the streamer which is only specified for 8ohm.
- Could be that in the shop you were actually listening louder than you thought and peaks were reaching 40W and given that the Luxman can reach 100W that one may not have been clipping. (86dB/V is not very high sensitivity but also not alarmingly low)
Could be that the Bluesound amp (class-D) has treble peaking and the Luxman did not (would result in different 'sharpness')
- Could be that the impressive looks of Luxman sets your mind (gives you a good feel)
This is the thing. It could be for many reasons why you perceived a difference.
Since you are a medical guy I don't need to tell you how a mindset can change perception of pain, taste, sight and hearing.
In the end... IF you prefer the Luxman and it is in the ballpark of what you want to spend go for it... listen to some other amps as well.
Now .... we here can't explain what you perceived and why.
What 'we' know is that
some amplifiers under complex loads (speakers) possibly
can sound audibly different.
What 'we' also know is that when 2 amplifiers that are used well below the limits of the least performing amp and those amps have been tested under complex loads (speaker) to have a 'flat' response withing the audible band (and just above/below) in a blind level matched and statistically valid way
can NOT be told apart by even the best 'listeners'.
Alas this last circumstance was not present.
'We' don't know why and can't give an explanation as to the how and why.
The most likely one is 'perception'.
Why does an AB amp sound different from a class D amp?
(in general)
Could be so for a number of reasons (PFFB design or not, output power)
All 'we' know is that not all class D nor class AB designs perform equally well.
There are poor class AB and class D amps and there are excellent class AB and D designs.
Are differences in the sound of amplifiers more due to preamplification than than to the amplifier itself (I think I read this somewhere)?
No... could be level differences, could be processing being done, could be filter settings of a DAC in use, could be all kinds of things including psychological.
Why would a class D amp like my Bluesound, which apparently tests very well, not sound better than the Luxman? What accounts for the intangibles that aren't measured by audio testing?
We don't know the exact circumstances.
Enjoy the music
Don't worry too much about thinking this or that is 'better sounding'.
That journey is literally
never ending, will cost you a fortune over time.
Humans are 'subjective' people and all perception they have is brain dependent.