Cass D based amplifiers are the most efficient and emit the least heat compared to class AB, not to mention class A based amplifiers. Class A where most of the power you poke into them goes into heat.
Little sound for the expensive watt money, so to speak.
BUT even class D amplifiers need to be cooled down. Those class D amps that get too hot are due to poor construction, too little heat dissipation via the heatsink.
How then is a modern class D amplifier in terms of long term reliability? We don't know yet
if new class D amplifiers will function flawlessly after several decades like a good class AB can do. But it is not possible to pull all class D over the same comb, so to speak. Discussed eagerly in this thread:
(an EE can, by looking at construction and its components, make a professional judgment about unit X's lifespan)
Hi, Looking for 2 channel amp to play a few hours 3-4 days a week. Would like to keep it for the next 10-15 years. Are class D amps today reliable enough to last that long without issues? Or should I go with AB amp? Don't really care one way or the other, but obviously my choice would be...
audiosciencereview.com
Edit:
If you have a class A amp with 20% efficiency then the remaining 80% has to go somewhere and that happens via heat. Class D based amplifiers have approximately 90% efficiency.