• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Ampapa D1 Stereo Amplifier Review

Rate this amplifier:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 4 1.2%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 52 15.4%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 196 58.0%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 86 25.4%

  • Total voters
    338
I'm disappointed in the power output and PFFB relative to 3e A7 units. But I might get it just to test if there's an audible difference with my LS50's, also a GFA-555 in the mix for on-grid use.

May end up powering the surround satellites just so I can get the dancing VU bling...
 
I'm disappointed in the power output and PFFB relative to 3e A7 units. But I might get it just to test if there's an audible difference with my LS50's, also a GFA-555 in the mix for on-grid use.

May end up powering the surround satellites just so I can get the dancing VU bling...
Half the price. You shouldn't be disappointed
 
Well I just think everybody is getting spoilt these days! Look at what this thing has - 12v trigger, balanced inputs, filter, vu meters ( not sure why people like 'em - but hey ho). Issue with PFFB but honestly is anybody going to hear it? £150 in the UK. Its just ridiculously cheap?
Channel imbalance not great but I wonder if that was the channel Amir used as a spark plug? :):)
 
@JSmith internal pictures?
Thanks, just saw the review.

@amirm, cheers for the testing, fairly welcome results yet also room for improvement.

Pics (stock, no silly opamp replacing :facepalm: );

1771748270944.png


1771748051167.png


1771748364759.png


1771748440696.png


1771748685137.png


1771748793218.png


1771748836770.png


1771748927948.png


1771748980090.png


1771749023089.png


1771749065197.png


1771749159135.png


1771749226303.png


1771749290409.png


1771749337394.png



JSmith
 

thanks, and thanks Amir for the review.
It seems like a Douk A5 with display, I just hope they improved the high pass filter implementation.......
 
This is a review and detailed measurements of the Ampapa/Douk Audio D1 stereo class D amplifier. It was sent to me by the company and costs US $199.99.
I downgraded from a Great to Fine due to the load dependency. That is not acceptable (IMO) for an amp released in 2026.


If not for this, I might have been tempted for my LR speakers sourced from Denon 3800, just to get those pretty VU meters.
 
Unless one cares about the look more than the sound, 3e or topping seems to be a better choice.
As an owner of both a 3e A5 and Ampapa D1 I do not agree. "Better choice" is subjective until you lay down the criteria that determine what better choice means. Lets ignore the look.

If Better Choice means the Amp ASR members rate best in the poll, then the A5 wins by a lot. The majority rate it Great Golfing Panther and the D1 Fine Happy Panther. Amir Golfs both.

If Better Choice means performing better on Amir's tests then the A5 wins as it beats the D1 on most all but the power output test. Note that this would only make it the best choice for those who have read Amir's tests and believe performance measurement is most important. ASR members who complete the poll have read the tests.

If Better Choice means objectively evaluating Amir's results to determine which amp is most transparent the answer is not clear. Two performance differences could be audible in normal use: PFFB (load dependence) and Output Power.

The PFFB performance difference results in a worse case 1.6 dB variation that starts above 10kHz and peaks above 20kHz. Even with excellent hearing this will be nearly imperceptible. The difference is small, in a region with no music fundamentals, where our ears are least sensitive. The difference is dwarfed by speaker anomalies, toe in, and listening location. OTOH, once you read the tests, if you make a sighted listening comparison you will most certainly hear a predictive perception difference because the D1's PFFB graph looks nasty.

The power output difference favors the D1. At 4 ohms the D1 outputs 136w and the A5 92w. But, this results in just a 1.7dB difference in maximum output which is quite small, and does not matter if you never utilize maximum power. I think neither Output Power or PFFB Performance differences will impact objective listening for the vast majority of owners. However, many of us at ASR will see the PFFB issue as more problematical because it probably results from an engineering flaw rather than a design choice.

If Better Choice means useability and features the D1 has many more of them but whether they have positive or negative value to you is subjective. The LPF and Tone Controls may significantly improve objective performance depending on your circumstance.

If Better Choice includes price, the Ampapa D1 sells for 28% less ($200 vs $280 on Amazon)

When I put on my audio consultant shoes I would recommend the D1 as the better choice for most people. I would recommend the A5 to those who read ASR. I like them both, use them equally, and gave both great golf scores.
 
Last edited:
I downgraded from a Great to Fine due to the load dependency. That is not acceptable (IMO) for an amp released in 2026.


If not for this, I might have been tempted for my LR speakers sourced from Denon 3800, just to get those pretty VU meters.
I don't mind a bit raise in high frequency which should be compensated by Audyssey
Very close to order this. They have a 15% discount now for Chinese new year, bring the price down to $170
 
As an owner of both a 3e A5 and Ampapa D1 I do not agree. "Better choice" is subjective until you lay down the criteria that determine what better choice means.

If Better Choice means the Amp ASR members rate best in the poll, then the A5 wins by a lot. The majority rate it Great Golfing Panther and the D1 Fine Happy Panther. Amir Golfs both.

If Better Choice means performing better on Amir's tests then the A5 wins as it beats the D1 on most all but the power output test. Note that this would only make it the best choice for those who have read Amir's tests and believe performance measurement is most important. ASR members who complete the poll have read the tests.

If Better Choice means evaluating Amir's results to determine which amp is most transparent the answer is not clear. Two performance differences could be audible in normal use: PFFB (load dependence) and Output Power.

The PFFB performance difference results in a maximum 1.9 dB variation that starts above 10kHz and peaks above 20kHz. Even with excellent hearing this will be nearly imperceptible. The difference is small and in a region with no music fundamentals, where our ears are least sensitive. The difference is dwarfed by speaker anomalies, toe in, and listening location. OTOH, once you read the tests, if you make a sighted listening comparison you will most certainly hear a predictive perception difference because the D1's PFFB graph looks really nasty.

The power output difference favors the D1. At 4 ohms the D1 outputs 136w and the A5 92w. But, this results in just a 1.7dB difference in maximum output which is quite small, and does not matter if you never utilize maximum power. I think the power and PFFB performance differences will not matter in use for most owners. However, the PFFB issue seems subjectively worse because it appears to result from an engineering flaw rather than a design choice.

If Better Choice means useability and features the D1 has many more of them but whether they have positive or negative value to you is subjective. The LPF and Tone Controls may significantly improve objective performance depending on your circumstance.

If Better Choice includes price, the Ampapa D1 sells for 28% less ($200 vs $280 on Amazon)

When I put on my audio consultant shoes I would recommend the D1 as the better choice for most people. I would recommend the A5 to those who read ASR. I like them both, use them equally, and gave both great golf scores.
A5 output 122w for 4ohm, not 92w. Amir corrected it in the text.
One can only wish a5 perform in D1 package. It looks very good.

To my untrained eyes this is not great not terrible?
 
3. The display, at least on mine, looks great but does not have a totally black background.
Yup, because it's not an OLED as its marketed. Quite common that the marketing straight up lies about this from many of these companies.

Thanks Amir, it's an OK buy at for the 169 USD I paid for it

Hopefully SMSL AL400 can be tested as well. Better EQ, actual display off, built in DAC, HDMI etc
 
PS: 5 A @ 48 V = 240 W
Amp: 2 x 136 W @ 4 Ohm = 272 W > 240 W (?)
 
Another meh implementation of PFFB.
Voted "not terrible", because in 2026 load dependency should have been just an argument of the past, disregarding of the price tag.
Thanks a lot fot this self-explaining review @amirm !
 
If strictly limited to $200 MSRP, it's the best amp for the buck!

Personally, I'd spend up for the 3e Audio A7 for this class of device.
 
Well I just think everybody is getting spoilt these days! Look at what this thing has - 12v trigger, balanced inputs, filter, vu meters ( not sure why people like 'em - but hey ho). Issue with PFFB but honestly is anybody going to hear it? £150 in the UK. Its just ridiculously cheap?
Channel imbalance not great but I wonder if that was the channel Amir used as a spark plug? :):)
Hear the errors directly over 10kHz? Maybe us oldies couldn't, but I have an old Linn LK1 preamp which rolls down from above 10kHz (I bought it cheap and then non working - leaky mempory battery - as an inexpensive MC phono stage I run from the fixed-level tape outs which don't seem to be band limited as much). It doesn't sound dull or rolled off subjectively, but a bit 'packaged' and 'constrained/contained' to the ear, absolutely justifying the need for measurements to show exactly what's going on! :)

These little amps so nearly get it spot on, but the errors they often still show, really do need some more work I feel. Many modern tweeters take off at 25kHz or higher, so I'd still politely suggest that response/IMD over 20kHz shouldn't be pushed to one side.
 
PS: 5 A @ 48 V = 240 W
Amp: 2 x 136 W @ 4 Ohm = 272 W > 240 W (?)
The PS can provide sustained (continuous) 240w, and more in short time. In any likely scenarios you use this amp for you can draw 136w in seconds or less (like a big explosion in movies)
 
Back
Top Bottom