I was under the impression that that chip drives the headphones directly, hence my assumption
DAC chip output is so weak that it needs I/V (or I/U) stage (typically an op amp these days), to be able to provide input for headphone or any other amp.
I was under the impression that that chip drives the headphones directly, hence my assumption
Yea, the balanced out makes all the difference, tho majority of reviewers used unbalanced only for their tests... weird aint it.Do you mean the DA3? With my Sennheiser HD600s the extra power from the balanced output makes a big difference.
I was under the impression that that chip drives the headphones directly, hence my assumption
http://www.essenceelectrostatic.com/product/evolve-ii-4k/What are their prices? You have to fill a form to get a quote??? What century do they live in?
Amir, testing some phono preamps that have USB-out would be appreciated. A bit of a change from DACs.
Well, the reason to do it would be because the LP master was treated differently than the digital release, e.g. not subjected to loudness compression.IMO such device somehow defeats the purpose of the vinyl, especially with modern recordings which, I guess, are produced to a digital master. And than you make a vinyl out of it. And than you convert it back to digital with USB phono preamp so you can enjoy it with some cracks and noise, which I'm sure sounds much better than listening to the digital master file.
And why would they do loudness compression on a digital master from which they want to make CDs?Well, the reason to do it would be because the LP master was treated differently than the digital release, e.g. not subjected to loudness compression.
I have no doubt they sound good, but the question is if they would sound even better if the same analog master have been converted to a file. I cannot imagine how those 2 formats can compare in terms of distortion and SNR.I have some LP rips from high-end turntable that sounds good.
Well its personal preference, i know people that would slit their wrists to have vinyl artifacts on their xrcds or dsd albums.
They think it sells better. They can't do the same thing on LP because the format has restrictions on what you can record on it, pun intended.And why would they do loudness compression on a digital master from which they want to make CDs?
They think it sells better. They can't do the same thing on LP because the format has restrictions on what you can record on it, pun intended.
My opinion that in this day and age price point and profit are more important than legacy. Sad, it just points out the fact that people in charge of producing, printing and publishing music/audio are not in touch with the people that listen to their products. Im sure that people would pay 100$ for pure analog streamlined product in non triple converted file for download or physical vinyl copy.I can understand that it's personal preference but in that case why not have it analogue all the way instead of converting to digital after phono preamp?
Sadly, I have to agree with you on that.My opinion that in this day and age price point and profit are more important than legacy. Sad, it just points out the fact that people in charge of producing, printing and publishing music/audio are not in touch with the people that listen to their products. Im sure that people would pay 100$ for pure analog streamlined product in non triple converted file for download or physical vinyl copy.
OK, here is a quick measurement of the output impedance on DA3 since I have been so late in reviewing it. It is 1.7 ohms which is pretty good:
View attachment 12925