You should know better than that, as it's actually very simple: the way you are supposed to listen to the speaker is represented with estimated in-room response curve. As long as your measured in-room response doesn't resemble estimated in-room response you are NOT listening to the speaker as it was designed to be listened. As your in-room response differs very much from estimated in-room response comparing your listening impressions with NFS measurements makes very little sense.
The predicted in-room response is based on a statistical average of a number of rooms (11?) in Devantier research paper. Being an average, it is not guarantee to match any specific room. It is a standardized way of looking at each speaker so it is good to use it that way. But it is not predictive of every speaker in every room.
In addition, the microphone that I used is not a professional one for that test so you certainly can't go by the whole curve. For detecting modal response is fine. It is also good for before and after testing of room measurements. But not as way to crosscheck research papers.
Finally the notion that the speaker from every corner of audio world is designed around PIR is preposterous. Most of these companies don't have the means to measure PIR let alone follow it for their design.
As much as we advocate using measurements to analyze audio systems, you have taken your marriage to them to another/absurd level. Reminds of a great paragraph in Dr. Toole's book:
As I said in my last response to you, you must listen. In my case, dialing in just one PEQ resulted in superb sound. Once there, there was no need to keep going for the purposes of evaluating a speaker (with respect to room impact).
Anyway, I suggest you cut out the attitude and complaining given how little you understand the topic and research.