• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Amazon Music - 24/44.1 material is "Ultra HD"?

Technically 24 vs 16 bit is a big improvement, so the "ultra" prefix is warranted given their terminology. Whether it matters audibly is a separate question.
 
There is something that is very clear: the CD quality is 16/24 bits 44.1 kHz when studio masters are 24 bits 96 kHz both uncompressed.
But is the modern world (streaming), the sound track arrive to your home using the broadcast/IT architecture of your provider.
This architecture quite always use a compressed media pipe line.
And here comes my mp3 example: you need a very high sampling rate for the compressed media to to get at your home a sound quality close to what you get with a CD.
When you compare a movie soundtrack from a streaming service and the soundtrack of a BR in DTS HD-MA there is no match.

So for music streaming, ask your provider the highest possible sampling rate.
I understood that some happy users are getting 96kHz from Amazon music HD.

Once again you appear to be confusing sample rates and bit rates.
 
For me, it's not about the highest frequencies, but rather that high res music seems to have a smoother, more natural sound to it. Certainly, at my age, my ears would not be able to pick up any advantage in the highest frequencies, anyway. I also notice the same increased smoothness and more "organic" sound of the music in the lossless Blu-ray formats, compared to the old Dolby Digital 5.1 discs. I guess this all could be due to expectation or confirmation bias, but I don't think so, as I'm pretty skeptical of claims of superior audio performance due to new technologies.

I’ll be honest, I’ve yet to find a hi-res album that is actually hi-res. It may be a 24/96 file, but so far, every time I’ve seen two clear things when I bring up the file in one of my audio editor tools:

- Rolloff starting at 20kHz and the noise floor being dominant by 22kHz. This tells me there’s zero content above 22kHz, which means a 44.1kHz sample rate would have worked fine.
- Noise floor at around -92dB. Or a total range of a little under 16 bits.

So, I’ve never actually had a true hi-res sound file wind up in my lap. Just files that are 3x the size so it can hold 8 extra bits of noise extending up to 48kHz. That alone is enough to make me jaded on the whole idea of hi-res.
 
Back
Top Bottom