• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Alsozone /3e Audio GaN Monoblocks | New Comer

@3eaudio
Can we expect to have the measurements? Has a copy been sent to Amir?

At the moment, the majority of ASR reviews concerning GaN amplifiers have demonstrated that they offer no performance advantage.
Will AlsoZone have succeeded in its gamble? I hope so.
 
Is it expected that they offer an advantage at this price point? To me it's about size, efficiency, a first product in this area from 3e.

If it would cost more than a A7 mono the expectations were there, sure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LIN
I managed to get my hands on the user manual. From what I've read, it appears to be an amp based on the ACM8816 chip.
I quote: "The amplifier is equipped with a pure digital pathdesign, supporting 24bit/48KHz ADC sampling rate for analog-to-digital signal conversion, ensuring high-quality audio transmission." This aligns well with the essence of the ACM8816 chip which is a purely digital GaN chip

Of course, at this stage, it remains a highly debatable assumption... On the other hand, if my hypothesis turns out to be correct, frankly, I might as well go for the latest LSYSA DA8 GaN dual-mono Amp in a single chassis featuring two ACM8816 chips.

It would be really nice of 3E Audio to give us more information.
 
They Come with 5A 48v ps is there any benefit of running these on 10A 48v? Thanks
 
Also in UK at £89 without PSU.




 
So you get a complete solution for 150 dollars, and it has potential to be so good that you can't hear the difference with good a dac+amp combo? That is just crazy.

We need to draw a contrast here, because if it involves the chip ACM8816 itself, we should expect degraded performance in exchange for relative compactness.
As I said on page 1: if the PSU is as big as the amp.. Hummm

 
PRIZE PACKAGE
I was charged NT$231 (USD: $7.15) in business tax and customs fees.
20260907_123603.jpg
20260907_123633.jpg
 
Last edited:
Without knowing the chip, and pending Amir testing

it cannot be predicted whether or not a 10A PSU would change anything, SQ or SPL.

Here is a PSU thread but ignore posts about going up to 51V with mono A7.


IMO $40 is pricey for 5A

However I have no issue with the PSU being much larger than the amp itself.

I am very happy with any quality components that easily accept DC power input
 
Nice treat to supply the big 10a psu and (I suppose) a properly rated y-splitter.
 
my pair shipped and are in transit for a few days. I hope this will be a nice upgrade for my home theatre where the auto-on feature will be a big convenience
 
Can anyone here tell me, other than price and size, does this gan mono have any advantages over the E3 audio A7 mono??? Particularly sound quality?
Many thanks!
 
Can anyone here tell me, other than price and size, does this gan mono have any advantages over the E3 audio A7 mono??? Particularly sound quality?
I think advantage in sound quality is not realistic. Take f.e. SNR 108db vs. 126db. The A7 is in a different league.

Price, size and efficiency are the advantages. Two GaN monos with psu cost as much or slightly less than one A7 mono?
 
I think advantage in sound quality is not realistic. Take f.e. SNR 108db vs. 126db. The A7 is in a different league.

Price, size and efficiency are the advantages. Two GaN monos with psu cost as much or slightly less than one A7 mono?
That’s exactly what I was thinking, too. An A7 mono costs as much as a pair of GaN monos. Logically, that suggests the A7 mono ought to be better. But then why did the manufacturer decide to offer the GaN monos? It doesn't quite add up.
 
Prospects here may be happy to pay double for just an incremental improvement.

Given that the unwashed masses in their billions globally have very different priorities

it would be stupid for a profit-seeking business NOT to have many "level" offerings that match the desires of as many different market segments as possible.

Especially those that have less money AND love the latest buzzwords.

However, once these are measured maybe they turn out to be "just as good" as A7 wrt to audible SQ, if not power output but still great for less thirsty speakers
 
That’s exactly what I was thinking, too. An A7 mono costs as much as a pair of GaN monos. Logically, that suggests the A7 mono ought to be better. But then why did the manufacturer decide to offer the GaN monos? It doesn't quite add up.
In other words have a wider product portfolio. And I'm sure they can sell some with the GaN buzzword and also because of monos, size and heat. Their marketing should know more.
 
I also own a BRZHIFI PAD-30. The GaN Mono's advantage is that it generates less heat, but it cannot be used directly with Y-plug speaker cables. All other equipment being equal, I prefer the GaN Mono; of course, this is just my subjective listening experience.
 
Back
Top Bottom