I compared the GaN Mono to the Fosi V3 mono and 3e audio A7 stereo amp. The GaN is significantly smaller than the Fosi and 3e audio amps (see attached pics, GaN in the middle, Fosi on left and 3e on right). The GaN runs significantly cooler (87 F) than the Fosi (103.5 F) or the 3e audio (102 F) as measured on top of cases after running. Also, the GaN uses significantly lower wattage (2.7 W) compared to the Fosi (10 W) or the 3e audio (12.5 W). I really wanted to like the GaN, but it fell short in direct comparison to the 3e audio (I didn't compare sonically to the Fosi since I preferred the 3e audio to the Fosi previously). Initially I used the RCA input on both amps with my Pioneer SC-LX901 receiver as a stereo preamp. I level matched using a test disc with a SPL meter. With both amps set to low gain, the GaN was about 3 dB louder than the 3e audio, but one of the GaN amps was 1 dB louder than the other GaN amp which was disappointing. The sound through the GaN was noticeably thinner than the 3e audio and the noise floor was noticeably higher through my Magnepan 1.7s vs the 3e audio. When using XLR inputs with my Fosi ZD3 acting as the preamp, the differences were even more stark, again with the GaN sounding much more edgy with occasional high frequency noises. The 3e audio reminded me why I love it so much with deep black background and much more natural, lifelike sound. I really wish the GaN was better due to the cooler running and lower energy use, but ultimately it doesn't compare to the 3e audio. For anyone considering the GaN, I would recommend the 3e audio A7 mono as I assume it would perform identically to the A7 stereo. Hopefully Alsozone can make improvement to the GaN, as I'd love a cool running, efficient amp, especially if they make an 8 channel version for home theater use in accessory channels.