Hemi-Demon
Senior Member
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2019
- Messages
- 438
- Likes
- 515
Thank you for the clarification, now I get it. I went ahead and ordered one.There is no DSD version. Just flash the for firmware on your DAC Rev
Thank you for the clarification, now I get it. I went ahead and ordered one.There is no DSD version. Just flash the for firmware on your DAC Rev
Just a little something from IVX to keep it interesting...and we achieved better THD than anyone else on ess9038q2m (THD is at -126)
It needs to be powered with 5.2V at 1.2A and a 5.5/2.1 Jack. Is the Jack center positive? (5.5×2.1mm input/5.5×2.5mm output (‘C’ black)Hi,
manual attached
@ any Allo rep/empl:
Looking at the Allo website I'm surprised to find the Revolution isn't available as a bare board RPi HAT.
And any attempt to open a legacy link that Google gives me to the Katana is redirected to the turn-key Revolution system.
Are you out of the premium audiophile grade Raspberry Pi DAC HAT business? Or is this a temporary situation?
Thanx!
Why don't you ship a Shanti to Amir?Hello
I am the designer of Revolution Dac. First , thx you Gjaz for the kind words
Second THD+N of Rev is at a minimum at -116.5 THD+N . THD is at -126 , I think thats quite different than D10s . Not only THD+N but also jitter and THD+N vs frequency at 90Khz bandwidth is very flat . We think that Rev Dac is one of the best (if not the best) in the world in unbalanced output in measurements based on AP data
Amir has a unit and depending on his load he will measure and post for everyone to see.
Now regarding "audiophile mythology" Rev was based on long standing myths . Plenty of capacitance of power rails , low noise clocks , low noise tested on every rail...and we achieved better THD than anyone else on ess9038q2m .
How is it possible that those myths actually show an improvement on IMD and THD ?
Further there seems to be belief that HF noise is not audible . I design with HF removed from output because I am convinced thats the main cause of "fatiguing sound " or " bright sound" of ess dac ic. How is that possible ? No idea .
I compared it with a Topping D10S, which mounts the same ES9038Q2M, but there is no comparison
Is that the D10 that you modified?
Yes it is.
But compared with stock LME49720 and same power supply (using iFi iDefender).
Any listening controls?
Hard to figure where the claimed differences would be coming from. Without more (any) controls there is no way to know...
Maybe the best THD, noise and IMD parameters make a difference?
I didn't take the microphone to equalize the levels because there was no need ... the difference was very evident. Lower or higher volume of single DAC the Revolution was always better...
But it occurs to me now that the Revolution has modifiable THD compensation ... maybe it's not set to have the same suppression as the D10S.
I've got a Revolution Dac for about a week now. Previously I had a Topping D50, a D70 and KhadasTB(the winner of the group ymho).
I must say that I wasn't expecting it to be that good...
I was prepared for spending hours of switching dacs back and forth, chasing small nuances or details.
Well, not this time. It's like .. two steps above all these dacs I had before and this can be clearly heard from the first song played.
The question now would be... Is the Revolution that good of a Dac or were the others that.. poor?
(for reference: I'm listening with KSE1200)