• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

All About UFO's

How much dope smoke is in the environment of the encounter? :-D
Well its probaly good shit idk here in Florida still some Marijuana that's suppose to grow wild allegedly some wrist thickness like stuff. What i heard but you know what i think about something the pods and natrual like that....something grew in a bubonic ditch for all i know who knows...
 
Here's a funny example. I could convingly tell people that I saw a moving object in the sky and that, by sheer luck, I had a telescope ready.
I immediately pointed it at the location and took images but of course, being soooo advanced, the aliens immediately detected my interest and just warped away.
I was barely lucky enough to catch the ripples their ship left in space-time when it warped. I have images, and they are authentic. No IA, no image manipulation.
I bet that, provided I managed to keep a professional, slightly worried tone, I could convince a bunch of idiots on youtube.

1786550353188.png



Now, here is the whole field and it contains interesting additional information. No aliens, I am afraid. Some stray reflection of the very bright star in the corrector, an improperly blackened screw in the optical path, whatever... But as an amateur doing public outreach, you won't imagine how many times I have seen handheld shaky smartphone shots of lights _proving_ that we aren't alone, how many times I have been considered arrogant and it was decided that I am either close minded or must belong to a great conspiracy.

1786550560717.png


For info, the shot above was just a short exposure in RGB meant to recover star colors in a Narrow Band Ha OIII exposure of the nebula called the "Ghost of Cassiopea"

1786551023449.png
 
Here's a funny example. I could convingly tell people that I saw a moving object in the sky and that, by sheer luck, I had a telescope ready.
I immediately pointed it at the location and took images but of course, being soooo advanced, the aliens immediately detected my interest and just warped away.
I was barely lucky enough to catch the ripples their ship left in space-time when it warped. I have images, and they are authentic. No IA, no image manipulation.
I bet that, provided I managed to keep a professional, slightly worried tone, I could convince a bunch of idiots on youtube.

View attachment 551248


Now, here is the whole field and it contains interesting additional information. No aliens, I am afraid. Some stray reflection of the very bright star in the corrector, an improperly blackened screw in the optical path, whatever... But as an amateur doing public outreach, you won't imagine how many times I have seen handheld shaky smartphone shots of lights _proving_ that we aren't alone, how many times I have been considered arrogant and it was decided that I am either close minded or must belong to a great conspiracy.

View attachment 551250

For info, the shot above was just a short exposure in RGB meant to recover star colors in a Narrow Band Ha OIII exposure of the nebula called the "Ghost of Cassiopea"

View attachment 551252
Nice picture,

Which star is the ultra bright one on right?
 
Here's a funny example. I could convingly tell people that I saw a moving object in the sky and that, by sheer luck, I had a telescope ready.
I immediately pointed it at the location and took images but of course, being soooo advanced, the aliens immediately detected my interest and just warped away.
I was barely lucky enough to catch the ripples their ship left in space-time when it warped. I have images, and they are authentic. No IA, no image manipulation.
I bet that, provided I managed to keep a professional, slightly worried tone, I could convince a bunch of idiots on youtube.

View attachment 551248


Now, here is the whole field and it contains interesting additional information. No aliens, I am afraid. Some stray reflection of the very bright star in the corrector, an improperly blackened screw in the optical path, whatever... But as an amateur doing public outreach, you won't imagine how many times I have seen handheld shaky smartphone shots of lights _proving_ that we aren't alone, how many times I have been considered arrogant and it was decided that I am either close minded or must belong to a great conspiracy.

View attachment 551250

For info, the shot above was just a short exposure in RGB meant to recover star colors in a Narrow Band Ha OIII exposure of the nebula called the "Ghost of Cassiopea"

View attachment 551252
Fantastic image, When i was looking at the first cropped image i was think where is that? I thought it was some kind of weird round disc nebula!
What did you think when you saw the circular shape flare in the camera!?
Where in the world are you taking these if you don't mind me asking?
You seem to have good dark skies, are the images stacked to capture the Ghost of Cassiopeia ( the constellation of Cassiopeia's such a beautiful sight and looks great through binoculars).
 
What did you think when you saw the circular shape flare in the camera!?
Thanks for your kind words!

"oh sh**" is the first thing that came to mind tbh. ;) It was unexpected because the filtered version had no artefacts (except the halo).

I've inspected the system in daylight now and I can't see anything wrong with it, which must mean that it is an internal coma corrector reflection when the angle of a bright source is just right. It is sometimes really hard to find the cause of strange artefacts in exposures even with complete access to the hardware. That puts many of those fuzzy strange unfocused lights in some UAP footage in the proper perspective imho.

Where in the world are you taking these if you don't mind me asking?

You seem to have good dark skies, are the images stacked to capture the Ghost of Cassiopeia ( the constellation of Cassiopeia's such a beautiful sight and looks great through binoculars).

Light polluted Belgium actually. The first image (the one with the purple flare) is a stack of around 15 minutes of short exposure that preserves the real star colors on the ones that aren't over exposed. The second image is approximately two hours (12 times 10 minutes exposures) with a dual narrow band filter that lets only Ha and OIII wavelengths go through (the bluish halo around the bright star is OIII reflecting within the filter itself). They are extremely reduced. Here's a detail of the tip.

1786714973140.png
 
Thanks for your kind words!

"oh sh**" is the first thing that came to mind tbh. ;) It was unexpected because the filtered version had no artefacts (except the halo).

I've inspected the system in daylight now and I can't see anything wrong with it, which must mean that it is an internal coma corrector reflection when the angle of a bright source is just right. It is sometimes really hard to find the cause of strange artefacts in exposures even with complete access to the hardware. That puts many of those fuzzy strange unfocused lights in some UAP footage in the proper perspective imho.



Light polluted Belgium actually. The first image (the one with the purple flare) is a stack of around 15 minutes of short exposure that preserves the real star colors on the ones that aren't over exposed. The second image is approximately two hours (12 times 10 minutes exposures) with a dual narrow band filter that lets only Ha and OIII wavelengths go through (the bluish halo around the bright star is OIII reflecting within the filter itself). They are extremely reduced. Here's a detail of the tip.

View attachment 551623
I always think it's really brilliant to see the the pinks and red of the nebula's with the camera, i remember looking for the first time at the Orion nebula through my Dobsonian and being amused that it was black and white!

I don't do much astro photography but enjoy seeing the night sky with my eyes, the moon through a telescope is like looking out of the porthole of a space craft orbiting the moon.
Globular clusters and to be able to see Jupiter and it's moons (bets are on that one of the Jovian moons has life of some sort!) in different orbits each night, 400 million miles away is away a treat.
I've seen a few of what looked like satellites orbiting the earth come to a stop and change direction, what these are no idea!
I also seen an object cover a number of star close to the horizon not sure what this was either, but that's about it, other than barn-owls and bats!
Unfortunately the mobile phone has ruined the idea of UFO's if they did exist we'd surely know about it now!
 
Truth only revealed briefly by people who experience it, condemned or disparaged by many
To truth only a brief celebration of victory is allowed between the two long periods during which it is condemned as paradoxical, or disparaged as trivial.
Schopenhauer, The World as Will and Representation

 
I think all of these sightings are time travelers from future Star Trek movies. It is an annoying artifact of AI’s takeover of Hollywood and caused by a paradox in the artificial neural network called the Edith Keeler Effect.

 
I've always found it interesting that the human species is an aberration compared to the rest of nature, why is that?
Sure other animals use tools and we can communicate with other species with some reasonable sophistication, and evolution has given other species natural abilities (quantum entanglement for navigation in birds for example, millions of years of evolution at play i suppose).

Ultimately the whole of first world civilization is built of technology that keeps us alive, without technology we'd all perish, only those living close to nature would survive, lucky then that we're not letting automated technology make decisions about our lives then ;)

You could argue i suppose that we are the most knowledgeable and technically sophisticated animal on the planet, but the least intelligent.
Could Aliens, or phenomena be our future-selves, or a glitch in the simulation?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom