All About UFO's

[sam_adams]

. . . part of the psyops plan . . .

Any properly designed and working psy-op has you questioning what you know, what you think you know, what you don't know, what you know you don't know, and who you trust to provide you with information. This has been working since July 10, 1947.

 

[WillBrink]

Any properly designed and working psy-op has you questioning what you know, what you think you know, what you don't know, what you know you don't know, and who you trust to provide you with information. This has been working since July 10, 1947.

Speaking of which:

In the summer of 1952, strange objects began appearing in the skies over the White House and major military installations. More than 70 years later, “drones” and odd lights were seen hovering over sensitive sights in New Jersey and across the east coast. What were they? Clues might be found in an elaborate PSYOP conducted on an unsuspecting veteran who had been working with intelligence agencies to prevent what he believed was a coming alien invasion.

 

[WillBrink]

On the list of possible explanations of the UFO/UAP phenomena, is that they're demonic. There are some high up in the DOD that hold that view. Of the possibilities (e.g., NHI from another start system, human tech, time travelers, inter dimensional travelers, etc), the demonic angle is one I had never considered until others mentioned it. I respect and appreciate his POV, but would also expect it to be via a narrow religious lens, which it is. But, we can't dismiss the alien phenomena is actually demons manifesting. Or, aliens are labelled as demons by people who see anything they can't fathom or understand, who are religious, as demons. I don't know the answer there, but either does anyone else. OK, maybe a few know the answer, and a few of them have been on the SR show...

 

[xray]

On the list of possible explanations of the UFO/UAP phenomena, is that they're demonic. There are some high up in the DOD that hold that view. Of the possibilities (e.g., NHI from another start system, human tech, time travelers, inter dimensional travelers, etc), the demonic angle is one I had never considered until others mentioned it. I respect and appreciate his POV, but would also expect it to be via a narrow religious lens, which it is. But, we can't dismiss the alien phenomena is actually demons manifesting. Or, aliens are labelled as demons by people who see anything they can't fathom or understand, who are religious, as demons. I don't know the answer there, but either does anyone else. OK, maybe a few know the answer, and a few of them have been on the SR show...

Lol, as if UFOs weren't a contentious topic on its own, let's throw religion into it as well.

 

[WillBrink]

Lol, as if UFOs weren't a contentious topic on its own, let's throw religion into it as well.

A good point, but it's not new within the UFO/UAP topic either. It does add an interesting twist to it!

 

[somebodyelse]

A good point, but it's not new within the UFO/UAP topic either. It does add an interesting twist to it!

So why would they be demons rather than angels? Next someone will be claiming B5 was prophetic not fiction - Vorlons and Shadows are real - and with as much justification.

 

[Tim Link]

Just thinking about my own feelings on the issues of extraterrestrial life, it's occurred to me that I'm not nearly as interested in it as I used to be. 20 years ago there was almost nothing I could think of that was more interesting to me. Now if it made the news that we had actually found complex radio transmissions from beyond the solar system that were verified to be from an intelligent source, I'd be mildly interested. What would I do with that information?

 

[Taiga]

On the list of possible explanations of the UFO/UAP phenomena, is that they're demonic. There are some high up in the DOD that hold that view. Of the possibilities (e.g., NHI from another start system, human tech, time travelers, inter dimensional travelers, etc), the demonic angle is one I had never considered until others mentioned it. I respect and appreciate his POV, but would also expect it to be via a narrow religious lens, which it is. But, we can't dismiss the alien phenomena is actually demons manifesting. Or, aliens are labelled as demons by people who see anything they can't fathom or understand, who are religious, as demons. I don't know the answer there, but either does anyone else. OK, maybe a few know the answer, and a few of them have been on the SR show...

Are these the same people who buy a roll of 50 pennies for $9.95 (plus shipping and handling)? Some people believe in things simply because they want to. And maybe have no resistance to people putting ideas in their heads.

Last US Pennies | Official Site

lastuspennies.com

 

[solderdude]

Religion ... another aspect that audio has in common with UFO/UAP.

 

[kemmler3D]

But, we can't dismiss the alien phenomena is actually demons manifesting.

I'd say there are actually plenty of things we can dismiss and this is really one of them.

 

[Taiga]

I don’t watch the UFO videos posted here. However, I finally realized why the Cover Image of the videos have always repulsed me. The graphics, hype, and promise of hyper-dramatic intrigue on the inside reminds me of standing in the check-out aisle at the grocery store. It is not a pleasant time spent when the lines are busy and all that you have to read is the covers of the rag publications. I now realize that I receive a negative stimulus shock to my brain whenever I see a UFO video.

Maybe it just something about me, like that I want to block areas of mind from new ideas, but it was a revealing observation of a behavior that may be shared by other people.

By the way, I have tried watching the videos. It’s always that same experience of putting a brain slug on your head and after an hour of your time realizing that you haven’t learned anything.

 

[WillBrink]

So why would they be demons rather than angels? Next someone will be claiming B5 was prophetic not fiction - Vorlons and Shadows are real - and with as much justification.

You'd have to ask those who believe such things. Humans are very superstitious by nature.

I'd say there are actually plenty of things we can dismiss and this is really one of them.

Sorry, you have neither the knowledge nor authority to do so.

 

[WillBrink]

I don’t watch the UFO videos posted here. However, I finally realized why the Cover Image of the videos have always repulsed me. The graphics, hype, and promise of hyper-dramatic intrigue on the inside reminds me of standing in the check-out aisle at the grocery store. It is not a pleasant time spent when the lines are busy and all that you have to read is the covers of the rag publications. I now realize that I receive a negative stimulus shock to my brain whenever I see a UFO video.

Maybe it just something about me, like that I want to block areas of mind from new ideas, but it was a revealing observation of a behavior that may be shared by other people.

By the way, I have tried watching the videos. It’s always that same experience of putting a brain slug on your head and after an hour of your time realizing that you haven’t learned anything.

Welcome to the internet? You new here? Jokes aside, plenty of vids posted contained none of that. But, that's modern click bait sillyness regardless of the topic.

 

[kemmler3D]

You'd have to ask those who believe such things. Humans are very superstitious by nature.

Sorry, you have neither the knowledge nor authority to do so.

I do, it's granted by living here in reality with the rest of the real beings. I can dismiss this as easily as I can tell you it wasn't Zeus or spider man. Demons, honestly. Maybe they're real in some universe, but not this one.

I'm not one of the folks who dismisses the NHI idea completely, but if the phenomenon is real, proposing demons as an explanation is backwards. People seeing something and calling it demons just tells us about the scope of those individuals' imaginations, nothing about the thing itself.

 

[somebodyelse]

Sorry, you have neither the knowledge nor authority to do so.

Why not? It's a Russell's Teapot situation.

 

[solderdude]

Wouldn't it be fun if a teapot floating in space at one point in time was found by aliens and they wondered what that thing was actually for and how it got there, couldn't figure it out and landed on the planet and gave it back to some poor soul somewhere out in the woods.

On the other hand wouldn't it be great if someone took a teapot along on a mission to space and launched it in orbit just for the fun of it.

 

[krabapple]

ANY DAY NOW alien visitation will be revealed as Truth

<rinse,repeat>

I don’t watch the UFO videos posted here. However, I finally realized why the Cover Image of the videos have always repulsed me. The graphics, hype, and promise of hyper-dramatic intrigue on the inside reminds me of standing in the check-out aisle at the grocery store.

Have you experienced Youtube much in the last decade?

Garish , corny, cheesy, cringey, trashy is the rule for 'cover images', not the exception.

 

[Axo1989]

I don’t watch the UFO videos posted here. However, I finally realized why the Cover Image of the videos have always repulsed me. The graphics, hype, and promise of hyper-dramatic intrigue on the inside reminds me of standing in the check-out aisle at the grocery store. It is not a pleasant time spent when the lines are busy and all that you have to read is the covers of the rag publications. I now realize that I receive a negative stimulus shock to my brain whenever I see a UFO video.

Maybe it just something about me, like that I want to block areas of mind from new ideas, but it was a revealing observation of a behavior that may be shared by other people.

By the way, I have tried watching the videos. It’s always that same experience of putting a brain slug on your head and after an hour of your time realizing that you haven’t learned anything.

One of the fascinations of this thread for me has been an otherwise inconceivable exposure to the dumbf*ck bro-fluencer section of YouTube, courtesy of Will and Terry. People have covered certain characteristics in recent posts and I can only agree.

Beyond the obvious, I'll recall that Jerry Mander's fun book Four Arguments for the Elimination of Television described the influence of that medium (in those days small screen, low bandwidth, shite sound) on program style/content (including a leaning to the simple/sensational to compensate for the narrow sensory window). YouTube (so often styled for phone screen viewing) carries on the grand tradition. I mean it's f*cking hideous, but it follows an effective formula. Even the ubiquitous yellow text headings follow old graphic design pop-psychology that deemed that colour attention-grabbing and trusted (god knows why). Also the exaggerated click-face expressions, as if we are babies or pets (I call this utter fixation with faces primate narcissism—that may be unfair to related species—but being more introverted and misanthropic than average I find it repulsive rather than attractive).

Now both those contributors neglect to answer the obvious questions: do you really watch this long-form shite? Do you really expect us to, without concluding that some mental deficiency is in play? And so on. And like you I've tried but can really only skim. There's nothing there. But it's in long-form anyway.

 

[Axo1989]

Sorry, you have neither the knowledge nor authority to do so.

I do, it's granted by living here in reality with the rest of the real beings. I can dismiss this as easily as I can tell you it wasn't Zeus or spider man. Demons, honestly. Maybe they're real in some universe, but not this one.

Will reveals an underlying psychology here I think. Note the appeal to authority. The entire oeuvre is riddled with military-adjacent personages and stylings, they being all the best people. And authority-by-association. Will and Terry's posts lean on credentialism, but the logical fallacies involved strangely don't serve as a warning not to engage in this serial slop-mongering?

The demon argument is interesting on an unintentional level. Will dismissed Jung way back in the thread but now makes his argument (unironically). When people have these hallucinations, they tend to match patterns in the individual's subconscious. Military people see aircraft and weapons, the general public see drones, religious people see demons, in older times people saw angels, and so on. And they often believe their projections.

 

[somebodyelse]

On the other hand wouldn't it be great if someone took a teapot along on a mission to space and launched it in orbit just for the fun of it.

Or brought back Elon's roadster?