Fair enough. I’ll admit I have not dug into this deeply enough to give an objective take on it.
One-and-a half-hours vs the pattern of long-form click-bait posted in this thread? Nobody would blame you.
Fair enough. I’ll admit I have not dug into this deeply enough to give an objective take on it.
Watch the video. Otherwise we are just talking in circles. Dr. Benner explains the importance of the finding of six-carbon glucose with regard to RNA.I agree with what the article actually says. Ribose, glucose, amino acids, and nucleobases are interesting findings, but none of this is RNA, and RNA was never mentioned in the paper or in NASA’s summary. These are simple chemical building blocks we have also seen in other meteorites for decades.
I'll make it easy for you. Here is where Dr. Benner discusses the importance of six-carbon glucose to RNA:I agree with what the article actually says. Ribose, glucose, amino acids, and nucleobases are interesting findings, but none of this is RNA, and RNA was never mentioned in the paper or in NASA’s summary. These are simple chemical building blocks we have also seen in other meteorites for decades.
Nobody, not Dr. Benner, not the host John Michael Godier, and not me, claimed RNA was found on Bennu, or anywhere else outside of Earth. So, I don't understand why you keep harping on the fact that RNA was not found on the asteriod. That is a moot point and not the point of the interview. The point is that six-carbon glucose was found, for the first time on an extraterrestrial object, and Dr. Benner explains the importance of that finding with regard to RNA.• NASA did not find RNA or anything close to RNA. They found simple sugars and organics.
Source: NASA press release
Nobody, not Dr. Benner, not the host John Michael Godier, and not me, claimed RNA was found on Bennu, or anywhere else outside of Earth. So, I don't understand why you keep harping on the fact that RNA was not found on the asteriod. That is a moot point and not the point of the interview. The point is that six-carbon glucose was found, for the first time on an extraterrestrial object, and Dr. Benner explains the importance of that finding with regard to RNA.
This conversation is but one more example of someone critisizing a video without watching the video nor even understanding the video's subject matter well enough to form a valid rebuttal to the video's content. You have provided links to numerous papers, but you have not articulated how any of those papers contradict anything Dr. Benner said in the interview.
Now, if you have a citation to a scientific paper establishing that glucose has no relevance to RNA, then that would contradict what Dr. Benner discusses. Then, we could have a valid conversation about the interview.
Yesterday there was an interview of three Congress members, Representatives Luna, Burchett and Berlison, on Jeremy Corbell's YouTube Channel. Basically, more of the same, except Burlison discussed a list he is compiling of first-hand witnesses to the supossed reverse engineering program, but their task force does not have authority to subpoena them to testify before Congress. He is hoping to convince his "boss" (I presume James Comer, the Chair of the Oversight Committee) to authorize subpoenas. Luna also indicated that she is working an avenue to get the alleged witnesses subpoenaed.So Age Of Disclosure type documentary, this is essentially the same show. Same people saying the same things. Glad to see it, but we have hit a wall as far as next real movement toward disclosures and evidence being withheld by the gubment. For those who follow the topic, little will be learned here. For those who don't, want a decent summarized view of those involved, worth a view:
We already covered that last page…
Did you read the paper in J.Nature?Did they find D-glucose, or a racemic mixture? Or isomerically pure L-glucose, for that matter? Life, generally speaking, cares about stereisomerism.![]()
Does it look like I did? Any one who read it will know.Did you read the paper in J.Nature?
Did they find D-glucose (the biologically relevant stereoisomer, at least for life as we know it), or a racemic mixture? Or isomerically pure L-glucose, for that matter? Life, generally speaking, cares about stereisomerism.
fun sugar nerd fact: D-glucose is the most abundant organic molecule (on earth, that is).![]()