terryforsythe
Major Contributor
"god did it"
Referred to as "intelligent design". It makes it more digestable for the scientific community. Kind of like UAP is more digestable than UFO for the public at large.
"god did it"
Well sure, but the fact that it could be non-zero is what is interesting to speculate about. I think the counter argument to this is that your probability calculation is based on our flawed understanding of our universe, incomplete at least. We consistently learn how much we don't know, but yes it could be anything really. There are theories.
I think ID is an interesting mental exercise, and the fine tuned universe topic compelling as to support for ID. That's different than "God did it" at least. While I don't believe said fine tuned universe demonstrates proof of ID per se, I do find the explanations for fine tuned universe (multi verse) highly unsatisfying, and without any evidence.Referred to as "intelligent design". It makes it more digestable for the scientific community. Kind of like UAP is more digestable than UFO for the public at large.
A video just came out, linked below, claiming that one of the primary sources of the WSJ article I referenced a few days ago is Susan Gaugh, who works with the DoD and who's own Linkedin profile states her expertise in psychological operations. Susan Gaugh is a contoversial figure when it comes to the UAP topic, to say the least. The video claims the WSJ article itself is part of a psychological operation and goes into depth debunking the article.
Why do you post such bat shit crazy loony tune video creators who’s entire existence is to fill the voids left by vacationing brain cells in the minds of the gullible?, if you’re attempting to sway non believers with your posts then you are not doing a good job
Why do you post such bat crazy loony replies. Don't like it, then why in the heck are you reading a UFO thread?
A video just came out, linked below, claiming that one of the primary sources of the WSJ article I referenced a few days ago is Susan Gaugh, who works with the DoD and who's own Linkedin profile states her expertise in psychological operations. Susan Gaugh is a contoversial figure when it comes to the UAP topic, to say the least. The video claims the WSJ article itself is part of a psychological operation and goes into depth debunking the article.
This phenomenon is, I think, the explanation for esoteric hifi cables, "free energy" products sold on the internet, quack medical products, and other such claptrap.Speculating about unknown physics in combination with known physics just gives us a narrower path to the same kind of fantastical nonsense though. Here's my crack at it:
Black hole cosmology turns out to be true and our universe is a black hole within a 4-D "master" universe, which is trillions of years older than our own. The vastly advanced Inhabitants of that universe can access ours by manipulating the 3D surface of the 4D black hole, enabling them to appear anywhere in the universe at any time.
Actual physics + superficially plausible sci-fi is not really better than "god did it" unless there's some actual evidence to go on.
Cosmic Religion by Albert Einstein (1931)Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution. It is, strictly speaking, a real factor in scientific research.
This was interesting because his is a channel about fighter jets, not UAP/UFO. He's never done a vid on the topic, decided he would now talk about his two experiences, now that it's not such a taboo for pilots. So he's lying, delusional, or gives an accurate account of his experience:
Speaking of black triangles yet again, he's made a niche for himself as a UFO/UAP debunker, yet, saw and experienced what so many others have. What was it?
"In this episode of “The Basement Office,” Steven Greenstreet reveals a close encounter he had with a black, triangular UFO in Provo, Utah, in 2003. Nick Pope helps Steven come to terms with what he saw, and helps explain why so many similar UFO sightings go unreported. They discuss why it couldn’t have been a B-2 bomber or secret government project like the rumored Aurora plane or TR-3B. Nick suggests Steven was “shown” this particular UFO for a reason."
Why do you post such bat crazy loony replies. Don't like it, then why in the heck are you reading a UFO thread?