Ouch. End of.This is the same guy who said the Etherregen is the cat's meow.
Wonder if he daisy chains all the switches that improved the sound he'll get an even better sound.This is the same guy who said the Etherregen is the cat's meow.
It is a bit out of topic, but he did say that there's a DAC with ESS 9038 chip for less than 30 USD, but does it sound as good as a Mytek unit with the same DAC chip? We all can absolutely say that no, it won't sound the same. The point of the video is: Is it good enough if we use the specs primarily for decision on buying an audio gear? Which is a valid question. The main point that he's trying to make, the specs are one of the reasons, but you need to judge it by your self too, be it the sound quality, usability, etc.
I'm 100000000% sure that it won't sound the same. DACs as a unit does not comprise of the DAC CHIP alone, same DAC chip but different power supply circuit, with different output signal circuit will make the DAC (as a unit) sound different, and will show different test results too... Btw, the "he" in my comment refers to Hans, the person in the video.I have no idea if the 30 dollar DAC sounds as good as a Mytek. I would need to listen to them in a blind test and see the measurements on both DACs. I might be wrong but I thought mytek used the 9028 chip? No matter. True the Mytek will probably have more connections which would be a reason to choose it over a 30 dollar DAC.
I'm 100000000% sure that it won't sound the same. DACs as a unit does not comprise of the DAC CHIP alone, same DAC chip but different power supply circuit, with different output signal circuit will make the DAC (as a unit) sound different, and will show different test results too... Btw, the "he" in my comment refers to Hans, the person in the video.
https://www.bilibili.com/video/av74358672
https://www.bilibili.com/video/av74358778/
4497 VS 9038专业版
x26 VS a22
Sorry, I sent it wrong.Welcome to ASR! Thanks. Nice music and 32 bit/192 kHz audio.
Unfortunately, it's a recording of speakers playing and does not seem to be level matched.
Martin
To a sensitive ears, a 100dB content (say a music concert), but with added distortion on the "sibilant" frequency range around 3dB, will manifest as "This DAC is a tad bright". The distortion adds up to the total of 100dB, maybe the content it self is around 97dB with 3dB of distortion, but once you listen to that kind of loudness, anything can be heard.
I've had a bunch. In a controlled test the differences disappear. Keyword is 'controlled'. Some quick sighted test looking at the devices hardly proves anything at all.ESS sounds totally different to AK, how many here actually have expensive DACs with both chips in them for comparison and aren't just using other peoples opinions?
ESS sounds totally different to AK, how many here actually have expensive DACs with both chips in them for comparison and aren't just using other peoples opinions?
How does expensive relate to it? I mean, some implication there, some correlation, like perhaps with "the implementation"...and assuming that the housing and terminals and so on do not affect the sound?
If the [implementation] is a factor, then it is not just a comparison of various DAC chips...so...?