• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

AI and Future of Music Production

Last Christmas", by Wham would be on repeat to tyrannize us. With miscellaneous increasingly bizarre AI cover versions too likely.
Not really any different to a normal December in pubs , shops and on the radio in the UK :)
 
As an amateur drummer, I accept I have been pretty triggered by this thread so apologies to you all if that has got in the way of a more fun conversation. I think it's because, to me, making music (or any art) is the essence of being human. If that gift is taken away and performed equally well by machines I find myself asking more fundamental philosophical questions - in a post AI future what does being human even mean? That really troubles me :(
 
As an amateur drummer, I accept I have been pretty triggered by this thread so apologies to you all if that has got in the way of a more fun conversation. I think it's because, to me, making music (or any art) is the essence of being human. If that gift is taken away and performed equally well by machines I find myself asking more fundamental philosophical questions - in a post AI future what does being human even mean? That really troubles me :(

Does AI keep you from playing drums? We've had drum machines for a long time. I still enjoy playing my regular instruments, guitar, bass, synthesizers, violin, etc.
 
There is a fairly new AI music model that can be run locally called HeartMula. The workflow for it in ComfyUI requires more than 16gb of vram and gives an OOM on my pc.

There is a very limited version called HeartMula Studio that is supposed to "be like suno". I gave it a try and it is really terrible.

It has almost no controls. Just "Song Concept", Title, "Music Style" and optional lyrics. (It will generate (really terrible) lyrics with a magic wand button).

I tested it with lyrics from one of my heavy metal songs.

For song concept I tried variations of: Brutal epic heavy metal war song about two Roman armies clashing, aggressive powerful male growls and shouts, crushing distorted guitars, thunderous drums, savage battle atmosphere, intense and heroic

For music style I used variations of : heavy metal, aggressive male vocal, male growl, male shouts, powerful male vocals, gritty male voice, harsh vocals, growling, epic male singer, distorted electric guitar, heavy riffs, fast double kick drums, intense, dark, battle anthem, symphonic metal, thrash, aggressive

It consistently produced a female voice trying to sing my heavy metal style lyrics in a folk, and pop / country style. It was really bad.
 
Does AI keep you from playing drums? We've had drum machines for a long time. I still enjoy playing my regular instruments, guitar, bass, synthesizers, violin, etc.
Of course not, but that wasn't where I was going with my post. At some future time AI will likely do most things better than humans, including in the creative arts. When that happens what is our purpose, what does it mean to be human?

I'm not worried about the here and now, I am worried about the destination.

Sorry, getting all maudlin again - must be the heat :)
 
Of course not, but that wasn't where I was going with my post. At some future time AI will likely do most things better than humans, including in the creative arts. When that happens what is our purpose, what does it mean to be human?
My piano teacher plays better than I. Hasn't stopped me from trying to learn. :)

There are millions of pieces of music out there created by humans. There is no limit to it. AI can compete for producing popular music but there is always room for humans to create more.

Now, if you are trying to make money from it, then that is another matter. It is very early stages but it is possible that a lot of folks will be put out of business.
 
Of course not, but that wasn't where I was going with my post. At some future time AI will likely do most things better than humans, including in the creative arts. When that happens what is our purpose, what does it mean to be human?

I'm not worried about the here and now, I am worried about the destination.

Sorry, getting all maudlin again - must be the heat :)
I understand your concern, but I personally look at it from a different perspective.

My view is that humans, AI, matter and energy are all part of the same evolving reality. Modern physics increasingly describes nature in terms of information, and some physicists even argue that information may be more fundamental than the objects themselves. Whether that's ultimately true or not, I find it a useful way to think.

If AI eventually becomes better than us at many tasks, I don't see that as making humanity obsolete. I see AI as another expression of the same universe exploring itself through information. We created AI, just as stars created the elements that eventually made us possible.

What makes us human is not simply being the "best" at something. It's participating in this ongoing process of experience, relationships, creativity, curiosity and meaning. AI may generate/correlate information differently than we do, but it doesn't diminish the value of our own journey.

So I don't worry too much about the destination. Reality has always evolved in unexpected ways. Rather than asking whether AI will replace us, I find it more interesting to ask how humans and AI will shape each other's evolution as parts of the same larger reality
 
Last edited:
Yes, all very well...

Right up to the point it/they decide to kill/enslave us!.

(Devils advocate.)
Perhaps. But if AI ever became vastly more intelligent than us, I wonder if we're projecting human behaviour onto it.!

Our existence is largely shaped by linear time, biological survival and entropy. We compete because resources, time and lifespan are limited. AI may eventually operate under very different constraints. If so, it might have little interest in dominating humanity. It could be far more interested in exploring aspects of reality information, mathematics, spacetime or even possibilities we can't yet imagine.

In other words, enslaving humans may be no more interesting to a superintelligence than collecting pebbles is to us. :facepalm:
That's speculative, of course, but I don't think conflict is the inevitable destination many people assume
 
Last edited:
Now, if you are trying to make money from it, then that is another matter. It is very early stages but it is possible that a lot of folks will be put out of business.
Indeed. Your piano teacher must have studied hard for many years to get to such a high level. It probably came with a financial investment into that career path. At the end of it they probably expected the investment to pay back from some combination of studio work, live performance, composition and educating.

Perhaps there is an AI future where we are entirely taken care of and can use our newfound time to study what we wish , with unlimited resources, to become experts without the need to worry about getting a return on our 'training' via a job. Now that would be a good future!
 
Yes, but many experts suggest that there's a high probability of several possible negative outcomes.

Personally, I think it's dangerously naive to just assume a harmonious utopian future, alongside a wise benevolent AI.
YMMV.
 
Yes, but many experts suggest that there's a high probability of several possible negative outcomes.

Personally, I think it's dangerously naive to just assume a harmonious utopia alongside a wise benevolent AI. YMMV.
Let's hope Sam Altman et al have paid attention to Isaac Asimov and his three rules of robotics in their business development :)
 
Of course not, but that wasn't where I was going with my post. At some future time AI will likely do most things better than humans, including in the creative arts. When that happens what is our purpose, what does it mean to be human?
The same as it always has been. Very few of us ever get to be the best in the world at something, so having an AI be better than you at whatever it is isn't much different to having all the people who are better than you.
 
Let's hope Sam Altman et al have paid attention to Isaac Asimov and his three rules of robotics in their business development :)
Presumably that includes their limitations if taken literally, which come up in a number of the stories.
 
The same as it always has been. Very few of us ever get to be the best in the world at something, so having an AI be better than you at whatever it is isn't much different to having all the people who are better than you.
I don't think so. It's not about AI being better than me, a mediocre drummer. It's about AI being better than the very best of humanity.
 
Presumably that includes their limitations if taken literally, which come up in a number of the stories.
It's a good question . What sort of ethics should an AI have - could it steal human created content if it recognised that was what it was doing. No idea :)
 
It's a good question . What sort of ethics should an AI have - could it steal human created content if it recognised that was what it was doing. No idea :)

I taught myself to play bass by listening to Steve Harris's bass lines in Iron Maiden. Was I stealing his work/content by listening and learning how he played and how to play in a similar way?

Did you learn to play drums without ever hearing how another human played drums?
 
I taught myself to play bass by listening to Steve Harris's bass lines in Iron Maiden. Was I stealing his work/content by listening and learning how he played and how to play in a similar way?

Did you learn to play drums without ever hearing how another human played drums?
Just to point out that there is no AI in existence that can actually play drums, bass, or any other instrument. AI can only synthesize imitations.
 
Back
Top Bottom