Yes. Quit supplying it with the electricity it needs to run.The greatest weapon is the "off" switch, its about time it was used
Yes. Quit supplying it with the electricity it needs to run.The greatest weapon is the "off" switch, its about time it was used
It's music Jim But not as we know it.How an AI listens to music...

Thanks for pointing out . I wish we had been given a choiceEngland & Wales privatised their water supply/sewerage in 1989 but not in Scotland, the uk government tried to privatise our water in 1994 but over 90% of the population who were polled refused the idea so the plan was scrapped
Meanwhile a.i companies shit scrape artists songs and uses them to train its model.
I would love to create covers or major releases for my own enjoyment. I kind of can do that now as I have all the gear and subscriptions to do it, but it is not as simple as I want it to be. I want to hear what Yes or Rush songs would sound like with a different singer for some of their songs, as an example. Or a slower version of something or an acoustical adaptation. It could open the doors to a new market where old music can be resold once again. I mean, what if Enya was singing all of the classic Black Sabbath songs from the early 70's.![]()
Meanwhile a.i companies shit scrape artists songs and uses them to train its model.
The team behind ACE-Step 1.5 took a strict "alignment-first over quantity-first" approach to prevent the downstream copyright risks that plague other music models. According to their technical report and Hugging Face disclosures, the models were trained entirely on a legally compliant, commercially safe dataset composed of:
Sounds a like a really great basis on which to create music - more worried about copyright infringement than any other metric. By implication does this mean that :
1. Their training data set is hugely incomplete and rather limited
2. their training data is made up largely of uninteresting s**t that was not good enough for somebody to release and be paid for, but which they can safely copy without fear of being sued.
Hi BrianI have posted several songs I generated with it in this thread. Judge for yourself.
It would be fascinating as a comparison if we could put your excellent lyrics into a setting with experienced musicians and a blank sheet of paper to see what they came up with bouncing ideas around with each other and you .
Oh ! Well 1-0 to AI on that scoreI did that in my 20s and early 30s. Most of the "musicians" didn't care about music. They just wanted drugs and women.
Lol. So, as long as the electricity/processing power of AI remains cheaper than cocaine, musicians should definitely be worried!
PS. Waiting for AI "drummer jokes" to become a thing.