You could also consider Yamaha WXA-50, it was reviewed favorable here on site. It is similar to R803D, without YPAO.
The C372 appears to be a nice unit. It has slightly higher power output.What do you think about C372 compared to C370?
I don't recommend peeps connecting 2 power amplifiers to the same speakers at the same time. It's a recipe for disaster.Did you A/B the amplifiers blind and have them switch inputs randomly? This should be relatively easy to do bc the Wharfedales have the double binding posts for biwiring. Just don't feed high volume signal from both amps at the same time! Or you can buy a 20 euro switchboard for peace of mind. @Doodski is this a sound approach?
The output transistors in quantity will reduce the output impedance due to the layout of the topography and it is a good indication if the amp is designed for higher current output. In this case the two NAD amps appear to have ample capability. More capacitance generally indicates a tighter voltage output from the power supply and more in reserve for transients. I have a education in electronics and technical drafting.Doodski, exactly what are you saying here ?? More refined because of the fewer output transistors or the biasing is better ?
Does more 'capacitance' always produce a more powerful transient ? Have an engineering background maybe ?
Pulling the data sheets really doesn't prove much unless you have measured and analyzed the circuit topology.
It's not similar to the R-N803D. They are completely different amplifier types and the output power is better on the R-N803DYou could also consider Yamaha WXA-50, it was reviewed favorable here on site. It is similar to R803D, without YPAO.
The OP is looking to upgrade his amplification not side-grade.Similar because of the Yamaha Musiccast… powered with IcePower 50W or AB class 100 W, the result will be similar on Whaferdales. Neither of the amplifiers will come out of juice. I self have the R-N803D and can say that I liked more sound from 25W D class amplifier on same speakers.
It's a open forum. The Yamaha WXA-50 is not a solution. Just because you have or listened to one does not make it good for everybody.I gave a suggestion to an OP. If you like suggestions for yourself, you should open own thread.
It's not similar to the R-N803D. They are completely different amplifier types and the output power is better on the R-N803D
I agree, everybody should listen to it to determine if it suits his/hers preference. Also, I have given my opinion based on the products that I own and have listened in different combinations. Class D, although nominally „weaker“ has exceeded in clarity and bass control ( Ice power 50, NCore 125 with linear toroidal power supply). If cheaper product has same or better characteristics, why pay more?It's a open forum. The Yamaha WXA-50 is not a solution. Just because you have or listened to one does not make it good for everybody.
Not sure what you mean. You proposed a amplifier he has never seen and so I can't see you stating that about others. He asked question and I indulged him if you are referring to me.Talking about product with which man has no personal experience, is like repeating mantra from some other sites.
Yeah sure.We have stated our propositions, it us up to OP to see if he is willing/able to try them. Sometimes even best intentions can cause confusion.
Quite a lot of subjective rather than scientific statements in this thread.
Om nom nom...Audio equipment doesn't eat other audio equipment for lunch or any meal ..
Quite a lot of subjective rather than scientific statements in this thread.
At this point I lean more towards the Yamaha for the “complete package” on the budget aspect, more than anything, and largely assured by Willem’s argument that the R-N series have “proper” stereo amplification stage and not my previous concern as being cheapo AVRs repackaged as stereo integrates. In the other hand, I understand it’s an all-in-one box with added streaming capabilities, room correction and all, which from a measuring standpoint do degrade the signal quality (as probably any additional digital processing would do), but at this point I listed these extended features in the asvantages bucket because from what I can understand from Amir’s measurements, it would hardly be an issue in practice, at an audible level. Right? Right??![…]
It seems he was already biased against the 'frankenstein' Yamaha..
[…]
So, @brotakul, have you narrowed your choice ?