You could also consider Yamaha WXA-50, it was reviewed favorable here on site. It is similar to R803D, without YPAO.
-
WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!
Advice on integrated amp for Wharfedale Diamonds 230
- Thread starter brotakul
- Start date
The C372 appears to be a nice unit. It has slightly higher power output.
I don't recommend peeps connecting 2 power amplifiers to the same speakers at the same time. It's a recipe for disaster.
The output transistors in quantity will reduce the output impedance due to the layout of the topography and it is a good indication if the amp is designed for higher current output. In this case the two NAD amps appear to have ample capability. More capacitance generally indicates a tighter voltage output from the power supply and more in reserve for transients. I have a education in electronics and technical drafting.
It's not similar to the R-N803D. They are completely different amplifier types and the output power is better on the R-N803D
Similar because of the Yamaha Musiccast… powered with IcePower 50W or AB class 100 W, the result will be similar on Whaferdales. Neither of the amplifiers will come out of juice. I self have the R-N803D and can say that I liked more sound from 25W D class amplifier on same speakers.
The OP is looking to upgrade his amplification not side-grade.
I gave a suggestion to an OP. If you like suggestions for yourself, you should open own thread.
It's a open forum.
The Yamaha WXA-50 is not a solution. Just because you have or listened to one does not make it good for everybody.
And the Yamaha WXA-50 is a class d amp
I agree, everybody should listen to it to determine if it suits his/hers preference. Also, I have given my opinion based on the products that I own and have listened in different combinations. Class D, although nominally „weaker“ has exceeded in clarity and bass control ( Ice power 50, NCore 125 with linear toroidal power supply). If cheaper product has same or better characteristics, why pay more?It's a open forum.
Talking about product with which man has no personal experience, is like repeating mantra from some other sites.
Not sure what you mean. You proposed a amplifier he has never seen and so I can't see you stating that about others. He asked question and I indulged him if you are referring to me.
We have stated our propositions, it us up to OP to see if he is willing/able to try them. Sometimes even best intentions can cause confusion.
Yeah sure.
UniPolar
Member
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2021
- Messages
- 43
- Likes
- 72
I agree. I'm rather new here also, and also expected more 'substance' .. I wonder if all the prior posts has help the OP to make his decision...
It seems he was already biased against the 'frankenstein' Yamaha..
I get that he is not able to audition equipment in his country, so he's asking for guidance which should'nt include un-necessary hyperbole . There's plenty of other audio forums where he can get that. Audio equipment doesn't eat other audio equipment for lunch or any meal ..
So, @brotakul, have you narrowed your choice ?
Last edited:
Om nom nom...
Raindog123
Major Contributor
OP
brotakul
Member
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2021
- Messages
- 33
- Likes
- 19
- Thread Starter
- #80
At this point I lean more towards the Yamaha for the “complete package” on the budget aspect, more than anything, and largely assured by Willem’s argument that the R-N series have “proper” stereo amplification stage and not my previous concern as being cheapo AVRs repackaged as stereo integrates. In the other hand, I understand it’s an all-in-one box with added streaming capabilities, room correction and all, which from a measuring standpoint do degrade the signal quality (as probably any additional digital processing would do), but at this point I listed these extended features in the asvantages bucket because from what I can understand from Amir’s measurements, it would hardly be an issue in practice, at an audible level. Right? Right??!
As it happens, I’m looking for a purchase within the next 2 months (need to address other stuff first, but I want to make my mind in the meantime), so I’m not hard pressed to do it tomorrow.
Aditionally, I discovered a “hugely” discounted Rotel RA-1572 on the local market at around the 1000€ mark, so i’s say in the same ballpark with the Yamaha.
Now, I see “some” probably more subjective reviewers site (i don’t know if i can say who, but i guess you already know them) bashing the 1572 (and the a14 for that matter) for falling short (and quite hard!) on “timing and dynamics”. It’s a very concerning review. Curiously enough, a second review of the 1572 i was able to find online states quite the opposite
), so yeah, talking about subjectivism…The reason i bring this amp into question is the original msrp ar around 1500€ mark, which makes me “think” i’d have the opportunity to buy a better amp for the money, given the almost 50% discount.
So now I guess I’m considering the Yamaha and the Rotel (if it so happens that the bashing article is misleading and biased on ads grounds).
Last edited:
