• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Accuracy of phone base SPL meters?

mcdn

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 7, 2020
Messages
559
Likes
780
In another thread there was some discussion of matching levels for test tracks, and the topic of how to measure levels came up, so I tried a quick comparison. The phone was balanced on top of the UMIK, so it's mic was only about a centimetre away from the UMIK's capsule:

In a quiet room I get:
REW+UMIK-1+calibration file: 36.8dB(A)
Audiotools iOS app on iPhone 11 pro: 27.5dB(A)
iNVH iOS app on iPhone 11 pro: 17.5dB(A)

And with some pink noise playing:
REW+UMIK-1+calibration file: 80dB(A)
Audiotools iOS app on iPhone 11 pro: 68.8dB(A)
iNVH iOS app on iPhone 11 pro: 57.8dB(A)

Question 1: Is it safe to assume the REW+UMIK-1 is correct?
Question 2: How can these results be so different? They're all A-Weighted, Hann windowed, on a very standardised device. Am I doing something wrong?
 

tmtomh

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
2,636
Likes
7,497
In another thread there was some discussion of matching levels for test tracks, and the topic of how to measure levels came up, so I tried a quick comparison. The phone was balanced on top of the UMIK, so it's mic was only about a centimetre away from the UMIK's capsule:

In a quiet room I get:
REW+UMIK-1+calibration file: 36.8dB(A)
Audiotools iOS app on iPhone 11 pro: 27.5dB(A)
iNVH iOS app on iPhone 11 pro: 17.5dB(A)

And with some pink noise playing:
REW+UMIK-1+calibration file: 80dB(A)
Audiotools iOS app on iPhone 11 pro: 68.8dB(A)
iNVH iOS app on iPhone 11 pro: 57.8dB(A)

Question 1: Is it safe to assume the REW+UMIK-1 is correct?
Question 2: How can these results be so different? They're all A-Weighted, Hann windowed, on a very standardised device. Am I doing something wrong?

Apologies if this a dumb question, but are all three devices using the same weighting scheme (A, B, C, or none)?
 
OP
M

mcdn

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 7, 2020
Messages
559
Likes
780
Apologies if this a dumb question, but are all three devices using the same weighting scheme (A, B, C, or none)?

All A weighted. REW and iNVH are both definitely 20Hz-20kHz, Hann windowing. Audiotools free version doesn't specify the frequency range or the windowing function, but it does lewt you set the weighting to A.
 

Blumlein 88

Grand Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2016
Messages
20,524
Likes
37,057
Nearly all phones have badly drooping response below 200 hz. With pink noise weighted to the lower frequencies your phone won't match the Umik.

And beyond that don't use SPL meters for level matching on test tracks. You can use it for level setting. But if you are matching levels to compare one track or device to another do that matching with a volt meter at the speaker leads. Match readings to within 1%.
 

RayDunzl

Grand Contributor
Central Scrutinizer
Joined
Mar 9, 2016
Messages
13,204
Likes
16,985
Location
Riverview FL
Question 1: Is it safe to assume the REW+UMIK-1 is correct?

The UMIK-1 via REW matches a pair of cheap dedicated SPL meters I have (close enough anyway).

1607917777488.png


Question 2: How can these results be so different?

They aren't calibrated devices traceable to a standard.

https://www.bksv.com/en/Knowledge-center/blog/articles/sound/sound-level-meter-calibration
 
Last edited:
OP
M

mcdn

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 7, 2020
Messages
559
Likes
780
Nearly all phones have badly drooping response below 200 hz. With pink noise weighted to the lower frequencies your phone won't match the Umik.

Interesting, I'll try some other frequency ranges
 

tmtomh

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
2,636
Likes
7,497
I have an old Radio Shack SPL meter I've used for years (not for level-matching, but just for rough levels in the room). More recently I got the DecibelX iOS SPL meter for my phone, I realize neither device should be considered super-reliable, but they consistently match up with each other to within 1dB at all frequencies, so I tend to think they are reasonably accurate.
 
OP
M

mcdn

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 7, 2020
Messages
559
Likes
780
Limiting the pink noise to a range from 200Hz-10kHz gives:

REW+UMIK-1+calibration file: 73.8dB(A)
Audiotools iOS app on iPhone 11 pro: 67.7dB(A)
iNVH iOS app on iPhone 11 pro: 56.8dB(A)

For Android devices the crazy number of SKUs makes it hard, but the Apple devices have so few SKUs that it should be a breeze for the apps to know exactly the microphone characteristics and compensate.
 
OP
M

mcdn

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 7, 2020
Messages
559
Likes
780
I have an old Radio Shack SPL meter I've used for years (not for level-matching, but just for rough levels in the room). More recently I got the DecibelX iOS SPL meter for my phone, I realize neither device should be considered super-reliable, but they consistently match up with each other to within 1dB at all frequencies, so I tend to think they are reasonably accurate.

Just tried DecibelX (nice looking app) with 200Hz-10kHz pink noise:
REW+UMIK-1+calibration file: 74.5dB(A)
DecibelX iOS app on iPhone 11 pro: 66.4dB(A)
 

tmtomh

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
2,636
Likes
7,497
Just tried DecibelX (nice looking app) with 200Hz-10kHz pink noise:
REW+UMIK-1+calibration file: 74.5dB(A)
DecibelX iOS app on iPhone 11 pro: 66.4dB(A)

Yikes!
 

andreasmaaan

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jun 19, 2018
Messages
6,652
Likes
9,399
The short answer is (as others have already said) that you can't trust your phone's mic as its neither linear across the audio band nor calibrated.

FWIW, though, this is an interesting set of tests on a number of different phones/SPL meter apps.
 

Joachim Herbert

Senior Member
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 20, 2019
Messages
452
Likes
670
Location
Munich, Germany

staticV3

Master Contributor
Joined
Aug 29, 2019
Messages
7,539
Likes
12,008
Very similar test, with vastly different result:

 

robwpdx

Active Member
Joined
Aug 8, 2020
Messages
268
Likes
372
Was it here on ASR somebody posted a link to the AES study trying to figure out the most accurate one? With the verdict of that one being the winner?
I posted this article:


There are more articles listed on that link.

The app found the most accurate is:


It was the result of NIOSH having the best software ported to the platform with the most accurate microphone. The history is discussed on that app page.
 

Ifrit

Active Member
Joined
Apr 10, 2020
Messages
152
Likes
88
Ah, yes, that’s the one. Thank you!
I’ve been using the app since… forever it seems like.
 
Top Bottom