• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

A short blind audio test for golden eared audiophiles, uncompressed audio files vs MP3

How many did you get right?


  • Total voters
    2
Status
Not open for further replies.

Westsounds

Addicted to Fun and Learning
Joined
Jan 10, 2020
Messages
524
Likes
363
Many listeners cannot hear the difference between uncompressed audio files and MP3s. I came across this test whilst watching a Rick Beato video on YT, Audiophile or Audio-Fooled? How Good Are Your Ears.

Use your best speakers, headphones, and ears :) Can you distinguish the difference?

The link is to the multiple choice test.

https://www.npr.org/sections/therecord/2015/06/02/411473508/how-well-can-you-hear-audio-quality

It just goes to show. Can we completely trust our ears? The answer is simply, no!


I tested with headphones Sony MDR7506 via a DAC amp, and got 3/6. Just for reference, I’m 50 and my hearing has been tested, and it is excellent according to the audiologist.

My test results if you’re interested, and by not revealing which is which on the test either.


For me the first was easy, I got it right, but on reveal the lower compressed sound actually sounded better to me than the higher compressed file.

The second was a guess, and I was right, I couldn’t tell a clear difference between any of them despite multiple attempts of listening.

Third was very difficult, but I think I could tell the lowest quality one, but didn’t between the two better ones for me. And I guessed wrong, as I thought the high compression MP3 had the edge over the uncompressed.

Completely wrong on 4. It was a toss up for me, but finally revealed I was guessing between the lowest compression and the uncompressed. And my final answer was wrong, I actually picked the 128 file :D

Number 5 was a bit of a guess, it’s so hard to tell. In the end it was a toss up between the uncompressed and the high bit rate mp3, so I was on the right lines. But easy after knowing because I couldn’t tell much difference between them all in reality. I did get it right, but it was a guess.

Number 6 I really could not tell which was which at all. And a random guess it was. And I picked the lowest quality file, with that guess being the 128 file :D


I think it really depends on the music as well. I’ve conducted this test sighted with some music I’m familiar with, and I have found a significant difference between high compression files and uncompressed. But that was sighted and with very well recorded music, some of it. How accurate is that test, really. I did however struggle when the file was a less compressed file like a 356kbs MP3.
 
Yeah i have Spotify and Tidal and they both sound great. Just enjoy the music on your system and do not worry to much about bit and sample rates. :)
 
This is 10 year old test and has already been discussed here:

 
Many listeners cannot hear the difference between uncompressed audio files and MP3s. I came across this test whilst watching a Rick Beato video on YT, Audiophile or Audio-Fooled? How Good Are Your Ears.

Use your best speakers, headphones, and ears :) Can you distinguish the difference?

The link is to the multiple choice test.

https://www.npr.org/sections/therecord/2015/06/02/411473508/how-well-can-you-hear-audio-quality

It just goes to show. Can we completely trust our ears? The answer is simply, no!

Alert the media.
 
This is 10 year old test and has already been discussed here:

Ah OK Sorry for the repost then.
 
That actually isn't an ABX test. On an ABX test you would know the identity of A and B. For a trial, X would be randomized to be either A or B and you could switch back and forth between all 3 whenever you want. The trial is if you can properly identify if X is A or B. And then it would repeat for another trial with X being randomly selected to be A or B again. It is basically a difference test, can you hear a difference.

The link above isn't really that.
 
That actually isn't an ABX test. On an ABX test you would know the identity of A and B. For a trial, X would be randomized to be either A or B and you could switch back and forth between all 3 whenever you want. The trial is if you can properly identify if X is A or B. And then it would repeat for another trial with X being randomly selected to be A or B again. It is basically a difference test, can you hear a difference.

The link above isn't really that.
You're right, it's and ABC test. D'oh! I got that bit wrong, who cares, as long as it raises awareness.
 
Locked for now as I determine next steps.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom