MattHooper
Master Contributor
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2019
- Messages
- 8,245
- Likes
- 13,864
There is SO MUCH 'blingtastic' and 'aspirational' and 'look at my big $$$ gear' BS in the other forums that it was nice to have this site be something completely different.
That’s too bad you feel that way. I personally love looking at other peoples set-ups, whether they are modest or whether they are elaborate. If they are deeply satisfied, happy, even proud, good on them. I don’t see any reason to begrudge somebody their happiness, especially if it’s the result of their passion? I see it as part of a community sharing a hobby.
It's not very different anymore and that's a bummer.
Really? Where are you seeing this influx of people posting blingy systems full of braggadocio? Does something like the “ most beautiful speakers in the world” thread offend you perhaps? Do you want no pictures posted at all? Or some particular cap on what somebody has paid in order for them to post about their system so as to not offend?
You seem to be offended or annoyed about something, but it’s still pretty vague. In my case above, as I said, I was offering my self with a target on my back to investigate what you found to be “ too far.” I’m pretty squeamish about mentioning what I paid for anything, which is why I was only offering it for critique. This is not the place where you’re going to get admiration for overpaying on old technology!
It also seems obvious that there are a number of quiet ASR trolls whose game appears to be endless posting about the virtues of audio subjectivity and chastising those who might question $$$ spent on audio baubles, usually not so aggressively that they get canned but enough to gum up the works.
You must have a finer eye for this stuff that I do. I’m not seeing very much of that.
Also, my feeling is the word “ troll” is inflammatory and often not terribly helpful, including when it is flung out with no specifics.
It’s sort of like walking into a party and saying “ a few of you are real arrogant assholes, but I’m not going to defend that claim and tell you who I’m talking about.” Sort of flings mud into the place indiscriminately. And the possible targets are given no opportunity to correct possible mischaracterizations of their views
.
I’d say ASR has indeed had the occasional visitor who fits the term “troll,” - all of them banned I think - but rarely does that term fit someone who sticks around. So I’m guessing at this point you are probably using the term a little bit liberally.