RexrothPigeon
Addicted to Fun and Learning
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2025
- Messages
- 767
- Likes
- 1,482
You are using an ai to defend yourself and it is not doing a good job. I did n't claim anything about "audible in all cases" lol
Ignored
-
Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!
A Home Network Experiment: Setup, Equipment Used, and Observations
- Thread starter claudia5
- Start date
Ignored
Citation needed! When has jitter been an issue in the last two or so decades in digital audio?
It’s the standard audiophile nonsense all over again.
Ask your AI to be critical, check sources, validate claims…
- Thread Starter
- #23
with my setup ,in my home ,we eard the differences
- Thread Starter
- #24
my ai is critical ,check sources 2 time ,validatind claims and more.
Keith_W
Master Contributor
Yeah, it is pretty obvious which of your responses are AI, and which are not. It's the replies which are full of typos which are not AI.
You are very rapidly proving that you are not here in good faith. Time to say goodbye. I think Amir is watching this thread, let's see what he decides.
You are very rapidly proving that you are not here in good faith. Time to say goodbye. I think Amir is watching this thread, let's see what he decides.
- Thread Starter
- #26
try to ask every ai you decide this question and you will get the same facts
"According to established EMC and signal-integrity theory (IEEE 802.3 Ethernet specifications, transformer isolation physics, and conducted/common-mode noise coupling), is it physically possible for electrical noise to couple across an Ethernet interface into downstream circuitry (e.g. via transformer capacitance, shared ground or PSU paths) without altering the digital data itself (bit-perfect transmission)?"'
"According to established EMC and signal-integrity theory (IEEE 802.3 Ethernet specifications, transformer isolation physics, and conducted/common-mode noise coupling), is it physically possible for electrical noise to couple across an Ethernet interface into downstream circuitry (e.g. via transformer capacitance, shared ground or PSU paths) without altering the digital data itself (bit-perfect transmission)?"'
That doesn’t answer the audibility claim, nor the exact manifestation you’re claiming. It a non-sequiter.
It is possible for that to happen. You don't need AI for that. The noise however, has to jump a massive valley to get into audio stream. To wit, USB interface has far more noise riding on it than any effect there. Yet, USB interface DACs produce distortion and noise well below threshold of hearing. It is the job of a good DAC/streamer to be immune to such. If your DAC has this problem, then get a new DAC.
- Thread Starter
- #29
why not? some of the unswer from the forum are that is not possible
No! The answer is that it’s not audible unless your equipment is incorrectly designed. Then you buy another $€£ 99 DAC not spend thousands of money on a switch.
- Thread Starter
- #31
it happens with 2 dacs, vincent 237mk and nod bluesound icon
This is an actor trying to pretend to be a doctor. Do you even know what those terms mean? You are just parroting nonsense that non-technical audiophiles and marketing departments spread.
OK, show the measurements. Noise is trivially measured. So is jitter.
- Thread Starter
- #34
i didnt measure . the differents in the sound was ovvius
That’s exactly why there is a policy on use of AI. It’s trained on that very same nonsense. If you don’t instruct it carefully it will just regurgitate the same slop, as is evident. And if you do, still caution is needed and manual verification is mandatory.
Yeah, it always is, until you remove the biases. We’ve seen it happen countless times.
- Thread Starter
- #37
what do you mean?
It basically means: NO PEEKING!
- Thread Starter
- #40
you dont believe that this things exist?or you dont than in my setup ?It basically means: NO PEEKING!
Similar threads
