• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

A Home Network Experiment: Setup, Equipment Used, and Observations

claudia5 said:
I reported a subjective listening observation, acknowledged potential bias, and discussed whether known physical mechanisms could in principle explain such observations — which is a different discussion entirely.


Conflating “I heard something under specific conditions” with “this is audibly different in all cases” is a category error.
Click to expand...
You are using an ai to defend yourself and it is not doing a good job. I did n't claim anything about "audible in all cases" lol

Ignored
 
claudia5 said:
Where it becomes incomplete is with time-domain and phase-related phenomena (e.g. jitter-induced modulation, reference noise coupling), which may not show up in a simple null or averaged FFT, yet can affect low-level detail through masking.
Click to expand...
Citation needed! When has jitter been an issue in the last two or so decades in digital audio?

It’s the standard audiophile nonsense all over again.

Ask your AI to be critical, check sources, validate claims…
 
voodooless said:
Citation needed! When has jitter been an issue in the last two or so decades in digital audio?

It’s the standard audiophile nonsense all over again.

Ask your AI to be critical, check sources, validate claims…
Click to expand...
my ai is critical ,check sources 2 time ,validatind claims and more.
 
Yeah, it is pretty obvious which of your responses are AI, and which are not. It's the replies which are full of typos which are not AI.

You are very rapidly proving that you are not here in good faith. Time to say goodbye. I think Amir is watching this thread, let's see what he decides.
 
try to ask every ai you decide this question and you will get the same facts
"According to established EMC and signal-integrity theory (IEEE 802.3 Ethernet specifications, transformer isolation physics, and conducted/common-mode noise coupling), is it physically possible for electrical noise to couple across an Ethernet interface into downstream circuitry (e.g. via transformer capacitance, shared ground or PSU paths) without altering the digital data itself (bit-perfect transmission)?"'
 
claudia5 said:
try to ask every ai you decide this question and you will get the same facts
"According to established EMC and signal-integrity theory (IEEE 802.3 Ethernet specifications, transformer isolation physics, and conducted/common-mode noise coupling), is it physically possible for electrical noise to couple across an Ethernet interface into downstream circuitry (e.g. via transformer capacitance, shared ground or PSU paths) without altering the digital data itself (bit-perfect transmission)?"'
Click to expand...
That doesn’t answer the audibility claim, nor the exact manifestation you’re claiming. It a non-sequiter.
 
claudia5 said:
"According to established EMC and signal-integrity theory (IEEE 802.3 Ethernet specifications, transformer isolation physics, and conducted/common-mode noise coupling), is it physically possible for electrical noise to couple across an Ethernet interface into downstream circuitry (e.g. via transformer capacitance, shared ground or PSU paths) without altering the digital data itself (bit-perfect transmission)?"'
Click to expand...
It is possible for that to happen. You don't need AI for that. The noise however, has to jump a massive valley to get into audio stream. To wit, USB interface has far more noise riding on it than any effect there. Yet, USB interface DACs produce distortion and noise well below threshold of hearing. It is the job of a good DAC/streamer to be immune to such. If your DAC has this problem, then get a new DAC.
 
claudia5 said:
why not? some of the unswer from the forum are that is not possible
Click to expand...
No! The answer is that it’s not audible unless your equipment is incorrectly designed. Then you buy another $€£ 99 DAC not spend thousands of money on a switch.
 
amirm said:
It is possible for that to happen. You don't need AI for that. The noise however, has to jump a massive valley to get into audio stream. To wit, USB interface has far more noise riding on it than any effect there. Yet, USB interface DACs produce distortion and noise well below threshold of hearing. It is the job of a good DAC/streamer to be immune to such. If your DAC has this problem, then get a new DAC.
Click to expand...
it happens with 2 dacs, vincent 237mk and nod bluesound icon
 
claudia5 said:
Where it becomes incomplete is with time-domain and phase-related phenomena (e.g. jitter-induced modulation, reference noise coupling), which may not show up in a simple null or averaged FFT, yet can affect low-level detail through masking.
Click to expand...
This is an actor trying to pretend to be a doctor. Do you even know what those terms mean? You are just parroting nonsense that non-technical audiophiles and marketing departments spread.
 
amirm said:
You are just parroting nonsense that non-technical audiophiles and marketing departments spread.
Click to expand...
That’s exactly why there is a policy on use of AI. It’s trained on that very same nonsense. If you don’t instruct it carefully it will just regurgitate the same slop, as is evident. And if you do, still caution is needed and manual verification is mandatory.
 
The point was never that this must happen but in my case it happen
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

klettermann
Wired copper ethernet vs optical ethernet - worth doing?
2
Replies
26
Views
2K
ErVikingo
ErVikingo
R
Help with hiss / white noise
Replies
4
Views
1K
solderdude
solderdude
N
Jittter
Replies
15
Views
2K
voodooless
voodooless
klettermann
Measurability of 'digital noise' in the real world
Replies
13
Views
1K
klettermann
klettermann
The Capstan
Announcement: A new kid on the block, introducing Osmium Sound
2 3
Replies
57
Views
4K
somebodyelse
somebodyelse
Back
Top Bottom