A Call For Humor!

[thegeton]

 

[KellenVancouver]

 

[BolusOfDoom]

 

[thegeton]

View attachment 383651

Nice porn 'stash...

 

[thegeton]

 

[thegeton]

 

[ohnonotagain]

Disappointed the green one isn't labelled "Yes you can".

 

[digitalfrost]

 

[-Matt-]

View attachment 383669

My multichannel audio setup is all analogue and therefore far superior to any AVR. The signal is not contaminated by any form of digital signal processing. Who needs this Atmos rubbish.

 

[thegeton]

 

[Ken Tajalli]

 

[Honken]

If my mate had a garden with a view like that, I'd gladly have a few wanks with him. Perhaps even several.

 

[Canuck57]

 

[Canuck57]

 

[Doodski]

It would be cruel to ask @Doodski to do this test, considering he has just recently recovered from having his wrist broken. But now I'm starting to wonder if his story about how it happened the first time was really true...

LoL... I had 5 gin'n tonics and lost my balance on a stone that tripped me when I was going backwards...LoL. That's the whole story... gg*

 

[KellenVancouver]

 

[Pegwill]

 

[Solveit]

 

[FreakyKiwi]

Perhaps this is a good time to mention (not for the first time, I know ) a linguistic quandary that's puzzled me for a long time.
Why is it that bra is singular, but panties is plural?

Singular on the top (shirt, jumper, jacket), plural on the bottom (pants, trousers, jeans, shorts).
Pants were reportedly originally a pair of separate leg sleeves. Panties are just small pants.

 

[mhardy6647]

Singular on the top (shirt, jumper, jacket), plural on the bottom (pants, trousers, jeans, shorts).
Pants were reportedly originally a pair of separate leg sleeves. Panties are just small pants.

I've gotta admit, I wasn't expecting a scholarly answer -- but thanks!