I'd venture to say that even 4k is not so widely adopted. For desktop monitor - sure, there are benefits, more text, you can view your 50mgapixel photos less scaled. But for TV - HD is where it is, you will need more colors, not pixels to enjoy it properly. And less compression when viewing streamed video.
Yes, I gave my parents a Panasonic plasma and wish someone still made plasma displays. And that I had purchased one for myself.I could not agree more. I will hang on to my HD Panasonic plasma for as long as I can. The colours and dynamic range are just beautifully subtle. As for pixels: here in the Netherlands normal TV is still 720, so not even proper HD.
I just installed a new media box from our cable company, and I am a bit concerned because picture quality seems somehow worse (darker with lots of contrast), and the audio tinny (optical out into my main stereo system). Lip synchronisation has also deteriorated, so I may have to delve into the manuals (grrr). The good news is that the new unit is far more energy efficient (saving me some 75 euro a year!) so it can do without the obnoxiously noisy fan of the old box.
I compare Blu Ray to Netflix 4k (and other streamers) on a 4k OLED 65 inch. For me the Blu Rays have a much nicer look to them feeling more detailed with better color. Having said that streaming 4k vs streaming 1080p is a step up on the major video services. Interestingly on smaller screens I didn't think the difference was all that noticeable for 4k vs regular Blu Ray.If you look at bitrates for uncompressed HD video (bluray), you'd possibly be surprised how hugely compressed other forms of it are. It does appear to me that hugely compressed 4k gives some room for fewer artifacts than you get for 2k. I suppose someone has done it somewhere, but I'd like to see a good comparison with the same data rates. Typically you'll need 6 mbps for regular HD in streaming form. And 4 times that for 4k and a bit more if you have the greater color gamut. I'd like to see regular HD at 25 mbps. That might be the better trade off.
I found LG OLED's to do quite well with text.I am sure that unless the plasma screen packs up I will buy a 4k screen for text editing before I buy one for video.
I'm not aware of any recordings done at 768.
Yes, there are now a handful of ADC's that do this. I'm unaware of anyone releasing recordings at that rate. I'm might be wrong, and I'm sure it is only a matter of time until it happens if it hasn't already.Recorded with RME ADI-2 Pro at PCM768kHz. You can buy with PayPal.
https://ototoy.jp/news/86785
https://ototoy.jp/_/default/p/82298
I'm unaware of anyone releasing recordings at that rate. I'm might be wrong
I didn't see the English tab at first. Ok.That link I shared is to a recording that you can purchase...