• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required as is 20 years of participation in forums (not all true). There are daily reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

8030C and KH120 - Subjective Listening Tests

ctrl

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 24, 2020
Messages
1,416
Likes
4,782
Location
.de, DE, DEU
I’m a measurements guy and today for the first time I listened “timbre” differences between speakers that perform similar in measurements.
Your ears are definitely better than your eyes ;)

The measurements suggest a significant difference in tonality.
The axis frequency responses are 1-2dB apart, but almost more importantly, listening window, sound power (and ER) differ significantly in the range 1-4kHz and above 7kHz.
All these curves (LW, SP, ER) represent "averages" from single measurements, so deviations of 1-2dB (over wider frequency ranges) are expected to show up as audible tonality differences.

(Unfortunately, there were only different measurement sources for the comparison)
1665062662236.png

Source: https://pierreaubert.github.io/spinorama/

listening tests are also significant and you should pick the one that is good for you and not just for measurements.
Definitely!
 
Last edited:

YSC

Major Contributor
Joined
Dec 31, 2019
Messages
2,802
Likes
2,116
Your ears are definitely better than your eyes ;)

The measurements suggest a significant difference in tonality.
The axis frequency responses are 1-2dB apart, but almost more importantly, listening window, sound power (and ER) differ significantly in the range 1-4kHz and above 7kHz.
All these curves (LW, SP, ER) represent "averages" from single measurements, so deviations of 1-2dB (over wider frequency ranges) are expected to show up as audible tonality differences.

(Unfortunately, there were only different measurement sources for the comparison)
View attachment 235561


Definitely!
the difference is there and to the degree I notice the difference, mostly in the highs/air region. but easily masked by environment noise.

in this category of performance I personally think that one could be satisified by either of these, I ended up choosing the 8030 instead of the KH120 mainly due to it uses class D which is less of a concern in hot tropical climate, and that it is $100 cheaper in Thomann during my shopping days, which is significant difference to me given similar extension, and for subsequent sub purchase the 7040 being cheaper, slimmer and extends good enough fits my usecase more. I would likely decide the opposite if the Neumann was cheaper back then
 

ctrl

Major Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Jan 24, 2020
Messages
1,416
Likes
4,782
Location
.de, DE, DEU
the difference is there and to the degree I notice the difference, mostly in the highs/air region.
Agree, the audibility of the differences depends on the listening environment. The higher the direct sound ratio, the smaller the tonal differences are likely to be. In an environment with diffusers and little absorption, the differences should be more audible.

is less of a concern in hot tropical climate
lucky you ;)
 

changer

Senior Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2020
Messages
438
Likes
445
Obvious difference on Sennheiser HD-25 II.
8020 and 8030 do not seem close from what we can see from the measurements.
 
Top Bottom