• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

7Hz x Crinacle Zero:2 IEM Review

Rate this IEM:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 7 1.6%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 12 2.8%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 53 12.3%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 359 83.3%

  • Total voters
    431
I picked up a pair of these recently and they are perfect for my treble sensitive ears. They pair very nicely with an Astell/Kern SR15 and no EQ but also sound very good with EQ similar to the review recommendation. I swapped the tips for some SpinFit W1s and I'm getting a good seal + tight fit on the nozzle. It is honestly a bit ridiculous how good these sound for the $ spent when paired with a good source. I don't have any super high dollar IEMs but for comparison my daily IEM driver has been the Meze Rai Solo EQed to soften the upper midrange peak but leave everything else as designed. That is a much maligned IEM that folks either love or hate due to the nonstandard frequency emphasis. I'm also one of those oddballs that like listening to AudioQuest Nighthawk/NightOwl headphones with no EQ so my listening preference leans towards a thicker bass tuning and these IEMs do not disappoint in that area.
 
I bought the S12 Pro a while back. They quickly became my daily drivers. While (imo) they sound quite good without EQ, a few minor tweaks can make them even better (when isn’t that true?). I don’t see them mentioned here much at all, which is why I figured I‘d throw this out there. They’re certainly a step up from the Zero 2s price-wise, but I feel they were well worth the cost. Not dissing the zero2, though. For the price, they are practically unbeatable.
I can imagine that the S12 Pro would be definitely better sounding than the Zero 2. The possibilities of the planar magnetic technology, and in particular the way in which the use of multiple drivers is not essential to creating a great sound across all frequencies, is a breakthrough. I was stunned when I heard the ARTTI T10. Still am. I did a fairly extensive listening session a few hours ago, which involved the ARTTI T10 and the Zero 2, and while I can appreciate the Zero 2 as a good choice, for the budget conscious, we have to place the Zero 2 in context.

Zero 2, is likely to beat out the competition, especially those in its price bracket, and its also very well made and comes well packaged with many tips. One gripe I have is the 3.5mm plug end of the supplied cable is rather small to hold, and is the most difficult cable I own, and takes rather more delicacy and effort to plug it in, or remove it from my DAC dongle. Much easier to have something more substantial to hold, at that end of the cable. Any comparisons with any planar magnetic, in my opinion are unfair, there is just no chance that the Zero 2, and that goes for probably other single DD IEMs, to sound anywhere near as resolving as a planar magnetic IEM.

Of course these are opinions, my opinion based on what I have heard, from my single DD IEMs, vs the ARTTI T10.

One other minor gripe, but this is not peculiar to the Zero 2, is I think they are supplied with the wrong eartips. And this is my hypothesis.

1. When I paired the Zero 2 with a wider bore eartip, the Clarion TRI, for my ears the large option of this eartip, fit like a glove. Best fit of any eartip, so far. But this opens up the frequency response of the Zero 2, in both the highs and lows, making the V-Shaped Frequency response more discernible, and increasing some of the screechiness/harshness in the upper frequencies. One one hand the tip replacement improves the frequency response of the Zero 2, but it also reveals some weaknesses of the Zero 2.

For those who "live" by frequency measurement plots, while these can be a good attempt at an objective method of comparing different IEMs, in the abscence of any alternative comparison method, it also begs the question, what eartips were used for these measurements.

Furthermore I find that reviewers, whose opinions I respect, such as Akros on Youtube, do not use the stock eartips or stock cables in their reviews. And most likely also in their measurements.

So unwittingly, the end user experience may NOT line up with the opinions of reviews, including any opinions expressed on ASR, cos we have this very valid opportunity for divergence, based on inconsistencies in teh use of these IEMS, with different cables and moreso with different eartips.

2. It is possible that the makers of Zero 2 (and I find this applies to KZ), deliberately provide eartips which dampen the upper frequencies, to "hide" the anomalies in the higher frequencies, where I detect a certain "resonance", and by resonance I mean an excessiveness, that becomes fatiguing and unpleasant, a shrill overtone. The use of a wide bore eartip exposes this flaw in the Zero 2, the more, albeit the wider bore eartip, nevertheless improves the overall sound of the Zero 2, making it more open and revealing its full potential, albeit highlighting the flaws in the upper frequencies. Using the same eartip, the third party Clarion TRI, on the ARTTI T10, also makes the T10 sound more open in the top end, than the stock narrow bore eartips. The T10 is supplied with its own set of wide bore eartips, but in my early days of using this IEM, they, in my opinion reduced the bass, making the presentation thin, so I was not encouraged to use them. The Clarion TRI (or similar eartip with a wide bore) is one "mod" I would suggest anyone who owns a Zero 2, experiment with.

Further details of this eartip enhancement of the Zero 2 and other IEMs is shared at the link below. I did start a new thread, to discuss this, but it's been merged with another one established by someone else. Kind of heavy handed admin management by ASR, but well that's their prerogative.!! Have no issue with it being moved to another section of the site, but being completely merged with some other thread, that's a 1st for me. Never experienced that. Never knew that was possible. But we learn each day.. Only learnt about the change, when I was searching for a link to the thread, so I could share it here. Anyway the link below, links to the relocated 1st post I made.

 
Anyone else had any problem with one of the sides getting lower and lower? :\ I did notice it once when I just bought them but it disappeared quickly, but now the other day I noticed it again with the left one being around 6dB lower and slightly altered in tonality, and today it was down by 13dB!
And yeah I did clean it, and tried swapping the cable but it's still there. Will contact the seller and hope that I can get a new pair, just wondering if this is a common thing or if I'm just unlucky..
 
Anyone else had any problem with one of the sides getting lower and lower? :\ I did notice it once when I just bought them but it disappeared quickly, but now the other day I noticed it again with the left one being around 6dB lower and slightly altered in tonality, and today it was down by 13dB!
And yeah I did clean it, and tried swapping the cable but it's still there. Will contact the seller and hope that I can get a new pair, just wondering if this is a common thing or if I'm just unlucky..
It seems like a silly thing but it worked for me and not only with this IEM: once in the ears, have you tried to see if this is not due to flexing of the driver?
It happened to me once and many times with another pair of IEMs and, once inserted in the ears, I gave them taps and the sound went back to normal
 
It seems like a silly thing but it worked for me and not only with this IEM: once in the ears, have you tried to see if this is not due to flexing of the driver?
It happened to me once and many times with another pair of IEMs and, once inserted in the ears, I gave them taps and the sound went back to normal
Nope, no dice :(
 
Anyone else had any problem with one of the sides getting lower and lower? :\ I did notice it once when I just bought them but it disappeared quickly, but now the other day I noticed it again with the left one being around 6dB lower and slightly altered in tonality, and today it was down by 13dB!
And yeah I did clean it, and tried swapping the cable but it's still there. Will contact the seller and hope that I can get a new pair, just wondering if this is a common thing or if I'm just unlucky..
Yes, one of my original pair dropped in volume after about 9 months daily use. It was a little disappointing, but given the price of them and (for me) excellent fit, I simply ordered another pair (and then another spare pair in when I spotted them for $15 on AliExpress).
 
Yes, one of my original pair dropped in volume after about 9 months daily use. It was a little disappointing, but given the price of them and (for me) excellent fit, I simply ordered another pair (and then another spare pair in when I spotted them for $15 on AliExpress).
Not sure if I like doing that, that's the definition of use-and-dispose, I've never ever had a pair of headphones (or speakers for that matter) that did something like this, buut that might be the actual price of these being so cheap and good sounding at the same time :\
Thanks for confirming this though. If I could get another pair of IEM with similar performance for a bit higher price I'd go for that instead, but I guess there's no guarantee :(
 
Not sure if I like doing that, that's the definition of use-and-dispose, I've never ever had a pair of headphones (or speakers for that matter) that did something like this, buut that might be the actual price of these being so cheap and good sounding at the same time :\
Thanks for confirming this though. If I could get another pair of IEM with similar performance for a bit higher price I'd go for that instead, but I guess there's no guarantee :(
Sounds like filter slippage/ gunk buildup to me. Get a torch and magnifying glass on the nozzles
 
Sounds like filter slippage/ gunk buildup to me. Get a torch and magnifying glass on the nozzles
True, right. By the way, on the T10, the net is only for protection and has no impact on the sound. In that case it would be enough to remove it, wash it and if no longer usable, order some on Aliexpress for the price of a coffee
 
Can zero 2 match MP145/143 or not even close? Thanks
I think the Zero 2 sounds better. They both come with extremely low distortion, so you can eq to your heart’s content and still be below audibility.
The only real reasons to pick one over the other are comfort and build quality imho.
 
Sounds like filter slippage/ gunk buildup to me. Get a torch and magnifying glass on the nozzles
I though I've cleaned it all, but did remove some small gunk from the small net and it did help quite a bit, but I still have some bass issues, it's almost like it doesn't seal properly anymore? Will try a different tip tomorrow.
Btw do anyone have any tips on tips for these? Maybe something foamy, I really do like them on my WF1000xm4.
 
I though I've cleaned it all, but did remove some small gunk from the small net and it did help quite a bit, but I still have some bass issues, it's almost like it doesn't seal properly anymore? Will try a different tip tomorrow.
Btw do anyone have any tips on tips for these? Maybe something foamy, I really do like them on my WF1000xm4.
I use Moondrop Spring Tips on mine. I've used foam tips a lot in the past, but I got fed up changing them every month for a new pair (I was commuting by train at the time and would ware them for up to 4 hours a day).
 
Can zero 2 match MP145/143 or not even close? Thanks
I do not own an MP145/143 but have put down a few thoughts on the Zero 2 and ARTTI T10, which has planar magnetic drivers, similar to the MP145/143.

In summary, my experience with the T10, is it possesses an extended frequency response, more accurately able to reproduce both very high, and very low frequencies. EQ can only add or subtract from what an IEM is capable of. If the Zero2 cannot reproduce certain frequencies accurately, EQ will have limited impact.

Hope you are ok with me sharing subjective opinions, as I am not one of the experts with tools to measure and describe what I hear, but that should not stop anyone of us from being a valid and valued member of this "science based" community, i.e my lack of possession of the scientific measuring tools.

I think each of the approaches deliver a different sound. Most likely due to how the technology works. In theory the planar magnetic(like T10, MP145, MP143), and the dynamic(like Zero 2), produce sound in somewhat different ways.

I think focussing on just the frequency response does not tell the whole story, of how different these IEMs are from each other.

Earlier today I was repeatedly struck with the impact of the ARTTI T10's planar magnetic driver, with the following improvements over the Zero 2.

But before I share these, permit me to state that our hearing is the result of a psychoacoustic illusion, for example a mono signal played back on a stereo set of speakers, appears to come from somewhere in between these speakers, i.e a phantom center, in spite of the fact that there is no such center speaker installed. Our ears recreate similar virtual perceptions, with IEM's in a way that I have found even more vivid than with speakers, especially one with a planar magnetic driver.

1. Stereo placement. So much easier to pinpoint exactly where each component of the mix is coming from. Was such a revelation to discover that lots of recordings I have heard for years, do not have the lead voice centered, but slightly panned to one side, ever so slightly. No other headphones or IEM's made this as apparent, and so easy to hear.

2. Clarity, like a veil has been lifted from the audio.

3. Transparency - reproducing the audio as is, without adding its own coloration.

4. Bass instruments are much more defined. Not about loudness, but about a perception of much better definition.

5. Much less volume adjustment, I tend to set the volume level at about the same place, yet quiet and loud music/audio plays back with such authority that the need to adjust volume levels, to hear better, is reduced.

6. Depth, that virtual sense that some instruments are in the foreground, and others are in the background in the distance. the Zero 2, in comparison, lacks such a virtual perception of depth, more just left and right, with no perception of distance from the listener.

7. Intelligibility - so easy to hear what is being sung, e.g. Rap music. Listening now to Kanye West on one of Beyonce's tracks, the remix of Ego. Shocking clarity of all of the points raised here, so easy to hear every single word he is saying. So easy.

I'm thinking that it should be possible to measure these things. My hunch would be, if I apply what has been done with speakers, 2 measures that give me a visual perception of how good I expect a speaker to reproduce audio. Waterfall plot + Impulse response. Wish I could measure these for every IEM, my hunch is that we'd have something that correlates with the listening experience, beyond just frequency response charts.
 
Thank you all for the answers, as I am not an IEM guy as I always after some time find the in ears to bother my ear canals.

But this is my feeling. I wanted to give a try to an IEM and not so expensive so as to find out if I can handle it or not. And as MP145 are a bit expensive I am afraid to spend that money. So I would like to give a chance and find out.

About Crinacle IEM do you think to give a try to Zero 2 Blue or Red (these IEMs I see that most users have)?

Thanks again
 
I hear the KZ PRX is ok., costs less. You'll have to decide for yourself. The main distinction is the size of driver. PRX uses a 13+mm driver, the T10 uses a 14.2mm driver. The cable and packaging of the PRX are standard KZ fare, nothing special.
Just scored the PRX a couple days ago, and so far... it's pretty darn spectacular. Also have the Zero 2 and I have to say the PRX thoroughly trounces it. The clarity is just so nice, and the open presentation, damn near orgasmic. I'm getting pretty decent bass quality too, planar bass, which I happen to love. These have been touted as KZ's best IEM to date, and I can believe it. 4th generation of tweaking and tuning the planar driver, its exact size remains a mystery, but the bass is not suffering any major deficiencies. The treble has been tamed a bit from previous models, but it's still there, sparkling and shimmering, wouldn't want any more of it. Wouldn't imagine the T10 or any IEM could sound much better than this, without EQ, think it might just come down to preference. Down side is it's not really portable to me, 94dB sensitivity, I'm driving it with a THX 789 using the stock cable, don't have a 4.4mm anyways, and at times I need to venture into high gain to achieve a slightly loud volume. Also, I'm a foam tip person, and the stock ones were too small for me to achieve a good seal. I'm using the New Bee L currently and getting that beautiful bass with the good seal and isolation.

So yeah, switching between the KZ PRX and the Zero 2, the 7hz is only better in bass quantity and punch, but just barely. I can be a basshead at times, prefer the Zero Reds with the Bass+ adapter, and also believe that IEM bests the Zero 2 in many departments, but at twice the cost. But still, the Zero 2 is outstanding stuff, a benchmark for value performance. I got it to drive it straight from my DAP and my laptop. The headphone out of my laptop is pretty weak, have to crank it to full at times, but they can drive the Zero 2 fairly well. Sounds great out of my DAP, so it was a nice and worthwhile purchase as far as I'm concerned, my portable solution.
 
Just scored the PRX a couple days ago, and so far... it's pretty darn spectacular. Also have the Zero 2 and I have to say the PRX thoroughly trounces it. The clarity is just so nice, and the open presentation, damn near orgasmic. I'm getting pretty decent bass quality too, planar bass, which I happen to love. These have been touted as KZ's best IEM to date, and I can believe it. 4th generation of tweaking and tuning the planar driver, its exact size remains a mystery, but the bass is not suffering any major deficiencies. The treble has been tamed a bit from previous models, but it's still there, sparkling and shimmering, wouldn't want any more of it. Wouldn't imagine the T10 or any IEM could sound much better than this, without EQ, think it might just come down to preference. Down side is it's not really portable to me, 94dB sensitivity, I'm driving it with a THX 789 using the stock cable, don't have a 4.4mm anyways, and at times I need to venture into high gain to achieve a slightly loud volume. Also, I'm a foam tip person, and the stock ones were too small for me to achieve a good seal. I'm using the New Bee L currently and getting that beautiful bass with the good seal and isolation.

So yeah, switching between the KZ PRX and the Zero 2, the 7hz is only better in bass quantity and punch, but just barely. I can be a basshead at times, prefer the Zero Reds with the Bass+ adapter, and also believe that IEM bests the Zero 2 in many departments, but at twice the cost. But still, the Zero 2 is outstanding stuff, a benchmark for value performance. I got it to drive it straight from my DAP and my laptop. The headphone out of my laptop is pretty weak, have to crank it to full at times, but they can drive the Zero 2 fairly well. Sounds great out of my DAP, so it was a nice and worthwhile purchase as far as I'm concerned, my portable solution.
Almost thought of getting the PRX, having owned the Artti T10 (planar) and the Zero 2 (single dynamic driver). More out of curiosity, and probably more out of the fear of missing out. But that kind of privilege has a cost. I'd have to buy the damn thing. And the worst thing about accumulating IEM's is, I'll end up using only one, the one I prefer, and all others would be in the drawer.

At some point in time, best to just get on with it, and enjoy what one already has, cos otherwise, one will never be satisfied. The IEM manufacturers are only to happy to feed the FOMO (fear of missing out), that every new product triggers., and it does not help when these devices are no more than the cost of a good or very good meal in a restaurant, for one.

There will always be one better out there, which we will never hear or own.

I think the time has come to declare that planar magnetics should be the minimum standard for an IEM, and dynamics serve the purpose only of showing us how far technology got to before planar magnetics were available at prices where almost anyone can now afford one.
 
Back
Top Bottom