fatoldgit
Addicted to Fun and Learning
- Joined
- Feb 29, 2020
- Messages
- 639
- Likes
- 926
Simplistically, in theory (as far as I can tell)
- we aren't changing bit depth so no dither
- the 48k to 96k just replicates each sample (n*2)
- the 96k to 48k just removes every second sample (n/2)
So do we end up with the original 48K and the resultant 48k audio being bit perfect/identical?
Or is there some hidden processing that will ensure this doesn't happen?
Note the "stuff" doing the upsample/downsample is hardware not software so I have no control over what happens.
Thanks,
Peter
- we aren't changing bit depth so no dither
- the 48k to 96k just replicates each sample (n*2)
- the 96k to 48k just removes every second sample (n/2)
So do we end up with the original 48K and the resultant 48k audio being bit perfect/identical?
Or is there some hidden processing that will ensure this doesn't happen?
Note the "stuff" doing the upsample/downsample is hardware not software so I have no control over what happens.
Thanks,
Peter