They're huge. Much faster switching speed and almost no dwell time. Efficiency is greater than 1% too, more like 8-10% better. It's not inconceivable that you could have 500W+ per channel in a box the size of the A7 and it won't get overly hot.
That just goes to show how easily people fall for marketing hype.
GaN FETs really shine in high-power—and, above all, constant-power—applications. And what is the one thing an audio amplifier *doesn't* have? Exactly: constant power output.
Furthermore, the advantages are usually cited in comparison to standard applications; yet amplifiers like the 325X series—as well as those from Purifi and Hypex—are already highly efficient switching amplifiers, operating at 90–93% efficiency.
On top of that, the operating parameters required for GaN FETs impose various design constraints.
Given these circumstances, a 1% efficiency gain over current switching amplifiers is actually substantial, while a 2% gain is pure fantasy.
There is a reason why none of the current manufacturers of GaN FET amplifiers show genuine efficiency measurements taken under real-world conditions in comparison to other switching amplifiers. They might not even be any better.
Which would you prefer: an amplifier optimized for audio reproduction, or one optimized for a specific technology?
Current GaN FET amplifiers don't convince me—partly due to reliability issues and their measured performance.
There will certainly be further, improved developments in the future, though the technology might well be overtaken by something else entirely.