• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

3e audio A7/A7 Mono Amplifier Review

Rate this amplifier:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 3 1.0%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 9 3.0%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 77 25.9%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 208 70.0%

  • Total voters
    297
Has anyone else experienced clipping indicators on their A7 mono/stereo, not while measuring, but while listening to music?
I have two A7 mono connected, bi-amped, to the bass section. I also have a Yamaha AX 892 on the treble and midrange.
I tried to trigger the A7 clipping indicators. My smartphone reading showed 95 dB from my listening position, but the indicators still didn't go off.

My neighbors' clipping indicators went off, and they called me. During negotiations, we agreed that I could continue my volume experiments for another 30 minutes. Even after increasing the volume, I still couldn't see the indicators working. Then a local armed coup, led by my wife, occurred, and I had to stop testing.

I never got to see how the CLIP indicators work.
I used Yamaha NS 700x speakers. 6 Om, 92 dB/W/m
Just for fun I thought I'd try to figure out what the SPL would be if I were to get a 3e Audio A7 amp to clip when playing through my La Scala speakers.

Situation
  • My tests with the A7 showed that --- with the RCA Gain set to Low (i.e., 25 dB) -- the amp would clip at 46W into a 16 ohm load.
  • I have La Scala speakers. Klipsch rates the La Scala as delivering approximately 105 dB SPL @ 2.83V @ 1m (i.e., 1 W at 1m when going into an 8 ohm load).
  • Although my speakers are tri-amped , an unmolested La Scala presents an 8 ohm load.
  • All of the drivers in the system are also rated at roughly 105 dB SPL @ 2.83V @ 1m
  • I am listening to 2 speakers
  • My listening positions are about 3m (10 feet) from the speakers.
  • I seldom listen at much more than 90 dB SPL.
Calculation

Recall:
  • while dB power is calculated as 10log(P2/P1), dB amplitude (such as SPL) is calculated as 20log(A2/A1).
  • adding a second speaker increases SPL between +3 dB (for incoherent/out-of-phase sources) and +6 dB SPL (for coherent/in-phase sources)
105 dB SPL --- SPL produced from 1W
+ 3 dB SPL --- additional SPL from second speaker (worst case, assumes speakers are incoherent)
108 dB SPL --- total SPL from both speakers
- 9.5 dB SPL --- SPL reduction at 3m distance (i.e., 20log(3/1) = -9.5 dB SPL)
98.5 dB SPL --- SPL at 3m when both speakers are driven with 1 watt

From information provided by Crown alongside one of their calculators, we find two formulae that can help us:
1) dBW = Lreq - Lsens + 20 * Log (D2/Dref) + HR
2) W = 10 to the power of (dBW / 10)

Where:
Lreq = required SPL at listener
Lsens = loudspeaker sensitivity (1W/1M)
D2 = loudspeaker-to-listener distance
Dref = reference distance
HR = desired amplifier headroom
dBW = ratio of power referenced to 1 watt
W = power required

Let's start by working backwards from 46W (the power level above which the amp starts to clip when driving 16 ohms)
W = 10 to the power of (dBW / 10)
46 = 10^(dBW/10)
dBW = 16.63
Recall that dBW was calculated with a 16 ohm load. The power into 8 ohms should be nearly double that.

Therefore,
dBW = 16.63 x 2
= 33.26

With that we can approximate the SPL using
dBW = Lreq - Lsens + 20 * Log (D2/Dref) + HR
33.26 = Lreq - 105 + 20log(3/1)+0 (since we are not interested in amplifier headroom at this time, HR can be ignored)
33.26 = Lreq -105 + 9.5
33.26 = Lreq -95.5
Lreq = 128.76 dB SPL

Of course, very few speakers could deliver that sort of output. The drivers in my La Scala would all have blown up before getting to those levels. And that's from one speaker! Adding a second speaker would add another 3 to 6 dB SPL, taking the volume above 130 dB (in theory). That’s extremely loud.

According Decibel Pro 130 dB SPL would be equivalent to:
  • a jet take-off
  • the loudest rock concert ever recorded
  • a gunshot at close range
For Yamaha NS 700x speakers

Let's repeat the calculation for @Argentum 05 's speakers.

First, let's need to calculate (well, approximate) the A7's clipping point into 6 ohms when the RCA Gain is set to Low (i.e., 25 dB).
If the amp clips at 46 watts into 16 ohms, it should clip at roughly
  • 92 watts into 8 ohms
  • 184 watts into 4 ohms
Extrapolating from those figures, we can expect something like 138 watts into 6 ohms.

Now let's calculate dBW
138 = 10^(dBW/10)
dBW = 21.4

With that we can approximate the SPL using
dBW = Lreq - Lsens + 20 * Log (D2/Dref) + HR
21.4 = Lreq - 92 + 20log(2.5/1)+0 (since we are not interested in amplifier headroom at this time, HR can be ignored)
21.4 = Lreq -92 + 8
21.4 = Lreq -84
Lreq = 105.4 dB SPL
The second speaker should increase the volume at the listening position by between 3 and 6 dB SPL.

At roughly 108 - 110 dB SPL, the noise level would be similar to that at a concert or when using a jack hammer. Listening at that volume can cause permanent hearing damage in just minutes. Your neighbours would be right to arm themselves and come after you. :)
 
Last edited:
Has anyone else experienced clipping indicators on their A7 mono/stereo, not while measuring, but while listening to music?
I have two A7 mono connected, bi-amped, to the bass section. I also have a Yamaha AX 892 on the treble and midrange.
I tried to trigger the A7 clipping indicators. My smartphone reading showed 95 dB from my listening position, but the indicators still didn't go off.

My neighbors' clipping indicators went off, and they called me. During negotiations, we agreed that I could continue my volume experiments for another 30 minutes. Even after increasing the volume, I still couldn't see the indicators working. Then a local armed coup, led by my wife, occurred, and I had to stop testing.

I never got to see how the CLIP indicators work.
I used Yamaha NS 700x speakers. 6 Om, 92 dB/W/m
You were not even remotely close. A 92 dB sensitive speaker makes 95 dB at 2 watts. You probably sit more than a meter, so perhaps your system was outputting 5 watts in total.

This amp can exceed 100 watts per channel into 6 ohms. Clipping should be about 110 dB or so in most listening rooms (but only if you believe Yamaha’s sensitivity and impedance).
I couldn't get the clipping indicator at my A7SE to light up yet. The amp is connected to speakers with a sensitivity of 91 dB (8 Ohms). At -12 dB on my Topping E30 II (RCA gain set to “High”), no clipping was detected.
I didn’t want to subject my speakers and my ears to any more than that. It was really loud.
The output power of the A7SE is more than sufficient for me.
You should simply refrain from performing clipping tests with such a powerful amplifier as the A7.
The likelihood of damaging your hearing and/or the speakers is far greater than the chance of seeing clipping indicators.

This kind of testing is done with load resistors or extremely inefficient speakers, which hardly anyone owns.
Suitable load resistors should be rated for at least 300 watts at 4 ohms.
 
At roughly 108 - 110 dB SPL, the noise level would be similar to that at a concert or when using a jack hammer. Listening at that volume can cause permanent hearing damage in just minutes. Your neighbours would be right to arm themselves and come after you. :)
Thank you very much for the calculations you did for me!

Am I correct in assuming that the CLIP indicator should turn on when my speakers reach 105 dB SPL?

If so, that's too loud for home use. And my speakers probably won't handle it.
 
You should simply refrain from performing clipping tests with such a powerful amplifier as the A7.
The likelihood of damaging your hearing and/or the speakers is far greater than the chance of seeing clipping indicators.

This kind of testing is done with load resistors or extremely inefficient speakers, which hardly anyone owns.
Suitable load resistors should be rated for at least 300 watts at 4 ohms.
+1 on what @Roland68 said.

For the A7 tests that I did I used a 16 ohm/200W power resistor as a dummy load. Even though I wasn't pumping more than 46 watts into it, it got hot!

I have 4 ohm/400watt and 8 ohm/200 watt resistors on order. If I were to order them again, I'd get ones with even higher wattage.
 
You should simply refrain from performing clipping tests with such a powerful amplifier as the A7.
The likelihood of damaging your hearing and/or the speakers is far greater than the chance of seeing clipping indicators.
Thank you. I understand. I'm not the enemy of my ears and speakers)))
 
Thank you very much for the calculations you did for me!

Am I correct in assuming that the CLIP indicator should turn on when my speakers reach 105 dB SPL?

If so, that's too loud for home use. And my speakers probably won't handle it.
@Argentum 05 that should be the threshold just before the clipping indicator on each channel comes on. Anything above that should cause clipping.
 
+1 on what @Roland68 said.

For the A7 tests that I did I used a 16 ohm/200W power resistor as a dummy load. Even though I wasn't pumping more than 46 watts into it, it got hot!

I have 4 ohm/400watt and 8 ohm/200 watt resistors on order. If I were to order them again, I'd get ones with even higher wattage.
I work in industry, so I'm referring to resistors that can withstand 300 watts continuously without being damaged. Of course, they can get hot. Some of them get over 1000°C, but unfortunately, they aren't induction-free.
 
Rather than clipping indicator on any one component

Is there a way to get visual notice of "max SPL I want"

that can be adjusted / calibrated by the system owner?
 
You were not even remotely close. A 92 dB sensitive speaker makes 95 dB at 2 watts. You probably sit more than a meter, so perhaps your system was outputting 5 watts in total.

This amp can exceed 100 watts per channel into 6 ohms. Clipping should be about 110 dB or so in most listening rooms (but only if you believe Yamaha’s sensitivity and impedance).
Bear in mind though, the phone measurement will be an average - or short medium term reading. Transient peaks can be 10db (10xpower) or more higher. Also a 6 ohm 92dB sensitive speaker needs 1.5W for 95dB (Sensitivity is to a voltage, not a power - and the lower impedance needs more power for that voltage), so under those conditions (2.5m), peak power is going to be around 180W to 190W (According to the crown amp power calculator)

Right on the ragged edge of clippping with this amp on a 6ohm speaker.
 
Rather than clipping indicator on any one component

Is there a way to get visual notice of "max SPL I want"

that can be adjusted / calibrated by the system owner?
VU meters? SPL meter?
 
Bear in mind though, the phone measurement will be an average - or short medium term reading. …

Right on the ragged edge of clippping with this amp on a 6ohm speaker.
Yes, but on the other hand, OP wants to see the clipping light and that may not come on until 3-5% THD. That can be several dB above where voltage clipping flattens the waveform. I am not sure the exact level needed to reach clipping because my A7 has never been close.
 
The clipping indicator from the TPA chip is self clearing, and lasts only as long as the signal is over the clipping threshold. The clipping indicator pulse can be as short as 0.5 ms. Without some extra circuitry to keep the indicator light on for a significantly longer period of time after a clipping event is detected, chances are that the light will be unnoticible because of the insufficient clipping time for the brightness to build up.

1776897118585.png
 
In terms of comparing two A7 Mono speakers to one A7 Stereo speaker, there's no advantage or disadvantage.

There can't be higher power output; the A7 is essentially two A7 Mono speakers. Or conversely, the A7 Mono simply omits one (mono) channel.

There are essentially no advantages or disadvantages. The channel separation is already very high with the A7, and the A7 Mono only really makes sense if you want to position the speakers close to each other.

A dummy load would be completely useless.
"Mono speakers"... Speakers?
 
The latter, with blinky lights warning my teens or their the guests to turn it down.

Ideally can trigger external devices e.g. via a relay

not cheap though.
 
"Mono speakers"... Speakers?
These are most likely the quirks of online translation. Google Translate constantly confuses words and meanings. When translating from Russian to English and back, it also often replaces "amplifier" with "speaker." Reading many posts here, I understand the meaning of what's written based on context, not literally.
 
@3eaudio

EDIT: I have made substantial changes to my original post. Further testing revealed that the autosense on capability does not always work when dealing with the amp that powers the tweeters.

I wanted to provide an update on the 3e Audio A7s that I purchased to use with my tri-amped La Scala speakers.

TLDR, they are excellent devices. They meet almost all of my goals. My only concern is that they may be too powerful for my use case; I have only about 6 volume steps between silent and deafeningly loud.

My setup

I run tri-amped La Scalas in a 2.2 system with two Bill Fitzmaurice designed (but home built) THTLP subwoofers. My source is a Bluesound Node streamer which connects to a MiniDSP Flex Eight DSP/active crossover. The 8 outputs from the DSP are connected as per this diagram:
System diagram.jpg

I have been using Aiyima A07 amps with the La Scala drivers. One amp drives the woofers, another drives the midranges (aka "squawkers"), and the third drives the tweeters. The three 3e Audio A7 amps would replace the Aiyima amps.

Why replace amps that worked perfectly well?

The Aiyima A07 amps performed perfectly well and I was happy with how they sounded. I purchased them because they provided an inexpensive way to experiment with tri-amping. Having convinced myself that tri-amping is the best way to go, I thought that I might upgrade the amps.

I was hoping that by upgrading the amps I could:
  • address some of the deficiencies of the current amps (imbalance between channels in each amp, inconsistency between amps)
  • make usage more convenient with auto on/off (preferably via a 12V trigger)
  • provide an ability to use XLR connections (not needed now, but maybe in the future)
  • see what difference PFFB makes
  • have more "headroom"
  • reduce clutter (fewer chassis and power supplies)
The 3e Audio A7 amps deliver on all but one two of those goals: I still have the clutter associated with 3 separate amps and 3 separate power supplies, and the autosense capability will not always power on the amp serving the tweeters. Although I had been concerned about the autosense on/off on the A7 (particularly since some drivers --- like the tweeters --- seldom see more than a few mW), the autosense has worked fine.

I had been concerned that the tweeters would require so little power (single-digit to double-digit mW) that the voltage sent to the amp powering them would be insufficient for the autosense to recognize that they needed to be turned on. It appears that concern has been borne out: the amp does not always turn on via the autosense. This is easily remedied by turning the amp on manually. The autosense has worked fine for the amp powering the midrange drivers and the amp powering the woofers.

However, even when music is playing, the amp sometimes seems to think that there is no activity at the tweeter and turns itself off automatically.


Integrating the new amps into my system

In my first post in this thread (post #1394), I reported that "the amps didn't sound great when I plugged them into my system". At that time I had not done anything to integrate them into my system, so that it was likely an unfair comment.

All that was necessary to get them to sound great in my system was to set the gain per driver. The A7 amps are more powerful than the Aiyima A07 amps they were replacing so that it was necessary to change the gain setting for each driver in the DSP.

I took two sets of 1m on-axis readings of each driver using a UMIK-1 calibrated microphone and REW. One set of measurements was of the existing setup (with A07 amps). I then replaced the A07 amps with the 3e Audio A7 amps and repeated the measurements. It was important that the microphone stay in exactly the same place for the two sets of measurements.

This chart shows what the gain settings needed to be:
gain.jpg

With those gain settings applied in the DSP and no other changes, the Frequency/SPL graphs of the 3e Audio A7 and Aiyima A07 match almost perfectly:
A7 vs A07 with Dirac - left.jpg


I'll refrain from making any subjective observations, apart from that I think that the system sounds really good with the 3e Audio amps. (But it did with the Aiyima A07 amps too).

Conclusions

The 3e Audio A7 is a fine amp; sonically it cannot be faulted. The A7 delivered on almost all of the objectives I had for the upgrade.

There are only two three things that keep the A7 amps from being ideal for me:
  1. Clutter
  2. Auto on/off
  3. Is it too powerful?
Three 3 amps and 3 power supplies add quite a bit of clutter; they take up a lot of space. I knew that beforehand of course and wondered if I should have opted for the 3e Audio/ALSOZONE PAM256 (essentially six A7 Mono amps in a single chassis with integrated power supply) instead. I'm still pondering that.

The biggest issue is that the autosense functionality doesn't work with my configuration. Specifically, at low listening levels my tweeters draw so little power that the autosense to know to turn the amp on (or to keep from shutting the amp off).
  • Depending on volume settings and source material, the signal is not always sufficient to trigger the autosense to turn on. This has been noticed only with the amp that serves the tweeters.
  • As mentioned above, even when music is playing the amp sometimes seems to think that there is no activity at the tweeter and turns itself off automatically. That is a deal breaker for me.
This does not affect the amps powering my midranges or woofers --- just the amp powering the tweeters.

Only users that have highly efficient HF drivers and are powering them with a separate amp would be likely to run into these problems with the autosense on functionality.


The A7 may be too powerful for my system. I have only about 6 positions on my volume control between silent and deafening. Although it's hard to measure, each volume position is about 2 or 3 dB from the next. Finer volume control would be desirable. But I don't know if going to a lower-powered amp would give me more granularity with the volume control, or if it would just reduce the "headroom".

The 3e Audio A7 is a fine amplifier. But, much to my regret, I fear it's not for me.

I'm reflecting on @Roland68 's suggestion that the lower-powered 3e Audio A5 might be a better match for my system. However, since the autosense problem would likely be present with the A5, it is a non-starter.

However, the 3e Audio/ALSOZONE PAM156, which uses the same amp modules as the A5 might be an option. It should address the 3 issues (clutter, on/off convenience, and insufficient volume granularity) that I identified:

  1. The PAM156 essentially houses several (mono) A5s in a single chassis with an integrated power supply.
  2. The PAM156 uses a 12V trigger for auto on/off.
  3. Each channel in a PAM156 is rated at 150W into 4 ohms @ 1% THD (versus 250W for the 3e Audio A7). However, I don't know if lower power would provide more granularity with the volume.
Unfortunately the PAM156 isn't (yet?) available in Canada from Amazon.
 
Last edited:

not cheap though.
Wow, exactly what I was imagining. Maybe useful as an A/B SPL comparator too for testing

At that price one would think it is accurate, or at least well repeatable.

Thanks!
 
Back
Top Bottom