PristineSound
Major Contributor
Hmm, then can you please convince SVS to reverse the price on their subwoofers to pre-tariff pricing?
A tax is a tax at the end of the day.
What no one mentions is that maybe with tariffs causing price increases it makes people actually think about making purchases. Do I really have to get a new cell phone or do I just want one? Does the bedroom really need a AVR with Dirac? Are you going to curl up and die if you don't get new IEMs? OMG a new Rolex will cost 3k more.
People are incapable of differentiating between need and want. Maybe if they spent less on wants they'd have more to spend on needs.
Then I must be outdated.
That's unfortunate, Aerials used to be really good.
"I don't like taxes."The whole "Tariffs are inflationary" argument goes against economic theory. A tax is a tax at the end of the day. Does anyone think that raising income taxes is inflationary? Classic economic theory would say a consumption tax will reduce consumption just like an income tax or a VAT and prices will adjust to reduced demand. The difference is consumption taxes allow the taxing of the underground economy i.e. hookers and drug dealers because they all buy stuff. Also unlike income taxes they a "voluntary", you can chose to not buy something and save or invest the money instead which can be helpful for the economy. Finally the US is running huge deficits so helping to reduce the deficit is not all bad. I don't like taxes and any tax will reduce economic activity but consumption taxes can be preferable to income taxes and runaway deficits are not the long run road to prosperity either.
Taxation without representation is what built this country. One heathen deciding who to tax and how much is absolute insanity. OP's example is perfect representation of this insanity.What no one mentions is that maybe with tariffs causing price increases it makes people actually think about making purchases. Do I really have to get a new cell phone or do I just want one? Does the bedroom really need a AVR with Dirac? Are you going to curl up and die if you don't get new IEMs? OMG a new Rolex will cost 3k more.
People are incapable of differentiating between need and want. Maybe if they spent less on wants they'd have more to spend on needs.
What no one mentions is that maybe with tariffs causing price increases it makes people actually think about making purchases. Do I really have to get a new cell phone or do I just want one? Does the bedroom really need a AVR with Dirac? Are you going to curl up and die if you don't get new IEMs? OMG a new Rolex will cost 3k more.
People are incapable of differentiating between need and want. Maybe if they spent less on wants they'd have more to spend on needs.
The whole "Tariffs are inflationary" argument goes against economic theory. A tax is a tax at the end of the day. Does anyone think that raising income taxes is inflationary? Classic economic theory would say a consumption tax will reduce consumption just like an income tax or a VAT and prices will adjust to reduced demand. The difference is consumption taxes allow the taxing of the underground economy i.e. hookers and drug dealers because they all buy stuff. Also unlike income taxes they a "voluntary", you can chose to not buy something and save or invest the money instead which can be helpful for the economy. Finally the US is running huge deficits so helping to reduce the deficit is not all bad. I don't like taxes and any tax will reduce economic activity but consumption taxes can be preferable to income taxes and runaway deficits are not the long run road to prosperity either.
It appears that FedEx has incorrectly classified this shipment as “Made in China” instead of “Made in Korea,” resulting in an excessive duty charge.I received my Ascilab C6B speakers a few weeks ago. I paid $1145 for them, including FedEx shipping.
Today I received a bill from FedEx for $429.38 for a 37.5% duty charge:
Or perhaps those in the U.S. that are less fortunate in society on low incomes such like myself who survives on disability benefits which are considered below the poverty line in the uk will end up paying a significantly higher percentage of their income on daily living costs and goods that are ht by tariffs compared to someone who is earning the U.K. average wage which is 2.5x my current income.
This misunderstanding of tariffs and representation of tax revenue with regard to income levels shows either a paucity of educational literacy or disregard for economic nuance across social classes
I was not given the opportunity to do the calculation. There was no indication that I would be paying China-level tariffs on the full retail price (including international shipping) of a product allegedly made in and sold by a company in South Korea, which has a much lower tariff rate. If I had been properly informed of that, I might not have bought them.If the tariff situation is hard to swallow.....just hold off until it settles down. And if doesn't sort to a tolerable level, just don't buy the speakers.
'Pretty simple calculation, in my view.
It's interesting to see how big is the difference, because South Korea has tariffs too.I was not given the opportunity to do the calculation. There was no indication that I would be paying China-level tariffs on the full retail price (including international shipping) of a product allegedly made in and sold by a company in South Korea, which has a much lower tariff rate. If I had been properly informed of that, I might not have bought them.
No. Tariffs will increase the price of goods. Increased prices show up as inflation.The whole "Tariffs are inflationary" argument goes against economic theory.
A tariff leads to an increase in marginal costs - this is a negative supply shock leading to an increase in prices and a decrease in equilibrium quantity that clears the market. (Principles of econ would be a leftward shift in the upward sloping supply curve resulting in a lower equilibrium qty and higher equilibrium price.)A tax is a tax at the end of the day. Does anyone think that raising income taxes is inflationary?
This is actually the opposite. I don't know anyone who declares their obligation for sales taxes on their purchase of prostitution services and drug purchases. However, most people I know do pay their income taxes.Classic economic theory would say a consumption tax will reduce consumption just like an income tax or a VAT and prices will adjust to reduced demand. The difference is consumption taxes allow the taxing of the underground economy i.e. hookers and drug dealers because they all buy stuff.
Are you confusing trade deficits with fiscal deficits? Why would a trade in goods deficit (which the US has with almost every major trading partner) which is offset by a trade surplus in services and surplus in financial flows, be bad?...Finally the US is running huge deficits so helping to reduce the deficit is not all bad. I don't like taxes and any tax will reduce economic activity but consumption taxes can be preferable to income taxes and runaway deficits are not the long run road to prosperity either.
If the tariff situation is hard to swallow.....just hold off until it settles down. And if doesn't sort to a tolerable level, just don't buy the speakers.
'Pretty simple calculation, in my view.