Good, but that’s not the tactile element I meant. Literal, not figurative.

“Clean” sound coming from limited driver surface area (e.g. active studio monitors) will probably fail to produce strong tactile sensation to everything outside the inner ears, which would leave listeners comparing their experiences to live performances want for a significant element in the overall concert experience - moving air.
Especially American rock concerts.
If SPL offers progressively diminishing returns as we perceive it (and it does), it makes me wonder if very “clean” transmission of sound as you put it
@srrxr71 - little to no perceptible distortion and optimal sonic “imaging” - by speakers causes (some of) us to seek volume levels we otherwise might not.
That seems like work major funding institutions
would be interested in. I haven’t done a pubs search on it, but seems especially relevant to headphones and active speakers: culprits of stereotypically (pun! ) producing very high fidelity.
Some physicians really dislike earphones because of client tendency to up the volume without recognizing how loudly they’re operating; based on the Genelec analogy (giant headphones), are good active speakers actually… bad… in
this regard?
Hopefully those queries don’t come off as irrelevant given the present focus on active speaker volume control.
Edit: removed a redundant line - written quickly over two short breaks…