Translation: we made it deliberately colored and like it that way.Here is the designer Peter Comeau's comment about his Wharfedale Linton 85th
As you have seen Erin found one area in the response that he thought was perhaps a weakness (actually it is just a factor of the drive units on the wide baffle and if 'corrected' in the crossover makes the speaker sound worse). But it doesn't stop the Linton 85 playing music in a way that makes you want to put on track after track until the early hours of the morning.
Many interesting and good speakers. A word of caution about Zu Audio. Their speakers can really color the sound. I would advise you not to buy them unheard. In fact, I would advise you to buy neutral speakers and AFTER that IF you want to color them via EQ. Then you have the opportunity to tinker and fix with FR as you wish and if you get tired of the coloring (many, most, do that after a while) you have your good neutral speakers to return to. Something you can't do with Zu Audio speakers. Or maybe you can EQ them to neutrality if their on and off axes follow each other, but that's such a backwards way of tinkering with speakers. Much better if they are neutral from the start.Cambridge Audio CXA61?
Marantz
Monitor Audio Silver 50 7G?
KEF LS50 META?
Ascend acoustics Sierra 1 v2?
Q Acoustics 5020 or Concept 30.
Elac DBR62 or UBR62
KEF LS50 Wireless 2.
Revel M106
Zu Audio DW6
Dynaudio Emit or Evoke
This is what I've been researching.
It seems like a good sensible combination for a smaller listening room I must say.Neumann KH120 II + MiniDSP Flex digital with Dirac Live and one or two good subs
Here is an interview with Peter Comeau. It was interesting as past and present HiFi is covered and how a lot of well-known brands fit under the IAG umbrella:Translation: we made it deliberately colored and like it that way.![]()
If you want tight bass, then I’d highly recommend the Lyngdorf with Room Perfect or something with Dirac.Ok, I do want tighter bass. So, no Lintons. Thanks again.
As above. But listen to as many speakers as you can up to your maximum budget and get the ones you like the most. The Wiim amp is small and light enough to take with you when auditioning speakers
I’d encourage you to stay away from Zu. They seem like good guys, and their marketing is pretty clever, but the actual speakers are not good. I had the predecessor to the DW6 before discovering this site - I now understand that flat frequency response and controlled directivity are the MINIMUM for accurate sound. I got rid of the Zus and am now enjoying my KEF LS50 Wireless II system immensely (I added 2 KC62 subwoofers, but you might not need them, depending on your space)!I like all kinds of music. Post Malone, Supertramp, Pink Floyd, has been the mood lately. I'm open to active. I currently listen to Sonos Era 300. That started me back down this awesome rabbit hole. Zu Audio DW6? Erin like Ascend too.
Could you provide any measurements before and after ? Mdat would be great.Dirac helped to center the scene in the middle and creates a tighter bass. Both speakers sound arrives more precise to the listener. This is only a matter of delay and sub-300hz correction
If you change the 1500hz dip sound get less laidback. It helps the speakers to sound less dark. And changing above 2000hz help the Linton to sound brighter
In my case, delay and IR correction until 1200hz, a little punch on 3000hz and speaker position pointing to my ears.
What you say is correct BUT the biggest challenge in that case probably lies mostly in what type of interior design style the OP likes. Let's say a room with few furniture and a wooden floor:Especially in such a small room you should spend the majority of the budget on acoustics.
Doing otherwise is pretty much a waste as it will never sound particular good due to high gain reflections and resonances.
Obviously one can also build certain acoustic products yourself and save. But the room needs to be addressed first for quality sound.
Devialet Phantoms probably.
Actually full-range, without an ugly subwoofer somewhere.
Nobody has a completely unfurnished living room, it's nothing to live in, so to speak. But for those who like more sparingly furnished living/listening room, it can be problematic, of course.If a small room has no proper treatment to break up reflections and resonances, no EQ or narrow speaker directivity will save it. Then better to go for head phones
P.S. Treatment doesn't need to look bad and traditonal line arrays really don't work in small rooms.
Okay, but what makes the difference between how it sounds in a completely unfurnished small room and a fully furnished ditto?There's no reverberation in a small room. Well proven decades ago. Using that as starting point will lead one down the wrong path. When is this myth going to die?
Thank you for the information.Many interesting and good speakers. A word of caution about Zu Audio. Their speakers can really color the sound. I would advise you not to buy them unheard. In fact, I would advise you to buy neutral speakers and AFTER that IF you want to color them via EQ. Then you have the opportunity to tinker and fix with FR as you wish and if you get tired of the coloring (many, most, do that after a while) you have your good neutral speakers to return to. Something you can't do with Zu Audio speakers. Or maybe you can EQ them to neutrality if their on and off axes follow each other, but that's such a backwards way of tinkering with speakers. Much better if they are neutral from the start.
Edit
I saw that you are thinking about EQ. Makes sense. Mainly in the lowest frequencies. The room makes a real mess with FR in the bass area. Then EQ is needed.
Keep in mind that the more EQ you do, the more power you need to take out of your amp, so fix enough power. Amplifier power headroom is always good to have.
Say that you perform EQ operations and lower the speaker sensitivity with 3 dB. This means that double the amp power is needed. This applies to passive as well as active speakers.
It might make sense to also have speakers with good power handling in case of EQ operations.
Really, someone has something like this ???Nobody has a completely unfurnished living room, it's nothing to live in, so to speak. But for those who like more sparingly furnished living/listening room, it can be problematic, of course.
Having said that, large physical bass traps in a small room, well...it undeniably takes up space, so it should be much easier with EQ in the bass area (regarding equalizing the FR). Reverberation time, on the other hand, requires a fair amount of furniture, carpets and or dedicated acoustic fixing stuff. On the other hand, an over-damped room can be experienced as having a boring, dry sound. You have to try yourself.I know you've been in my many threads addressing this topic, I'm just mentioning it to others who read this thread.
Starting from general advice regarding RT60 should be a good starting point.
Reverberation Time in Room Acoustics
Need to measure reverberation time with your sound level meter? Common room acoustics measurements of RT60, T30, T20 explained.www.larsondavis.com
_____
BUT this type of placement of speakers then?:
View attachment 370651View attachment 370652
![]()
Anyone has got or had an experience with ultra near field listening?
For about one year my absolute favourite listening setup is an active stereo 3-way (3 separate amplifiers) DIY construction with listening distance of 10-20 cm (depend on the Head position), made from HIFIMAN HE500, Visaton AL-180 for the bass (analogue crossover) and 2 x Dayton Epique E180 via...audiosciencereview.com
....extreme and then you might as well have headphones BUT top marks to UNF for such wonderful craziness.![]()