Warranty is void if speakers are exposed to "indirect sunlight." I guess they have to be used in a windowless room of at least 35% relative humidity. Ridiculous.
Targeting the vampire market?Warranty is void if speakers are exposed to "indirect sunlight." I guess they have to be used in a windowless room of at least 35% relative humidity. Ridiculous.
This must explain why old men in their 70's can hear stuff that analysers and people in their 20's cannot, they have properly run their ears in with decades of audiophile jazz, plus old men don't move about much.Yep, that's called burning ears in...
Surely fully assembled speakers are tested in the factory prior to shipping them out as part of QC. Wouldn't burn-in fall part of QC? If not, why not?
What incentive would the manufacturer have to send out a product that is initially poor? Doesn't make sense to me.
Not a nice way, imho.
Perhaps they interpret the act of moving the speakers around to mean that the customer is unsatisfied and is trying to find a position where the speakers don't sound like total shit. "The customer is trying to find the exact right location for our speakers! He is in full critical mode, must not let him think he can make a judgment! Must burn in again!"If they did the burn-in then you wouldn't get to experience the magic of the bad quantum particles leaving the cabinets.
I've heard of companies claiming the burn-in period before for equipment but I have never seen one that said you have to start the time over again if you move the speakers. So apparently any movement triggers a reset in the speakers break-in process
True. Probably should have said it is a gentler way of saying it. I guess when buying nearly $5,000 desktop speakers they figure people prefer talk of magic rather than the common sense of telling people not to just swap out speakers and make a rush judgment on if you like them or not.
Their customer service replies have to be fun
"Have you had them on for 250 hours? No, then let us know when you have"
"Okay, so now you've had them on for 250 hours and you still aren't happy? Did you move them in that time? Oh, then you have to start the time over"
"You didn't move them? Then try moving them. Let us know in another 250 hours. You may need to move them again though."
With their frequency response, it would surprise me if one ever found the right location.Perhaps they interpret the act of moving the speakers around to mean that the customer is unsatisfied and is trying to find a position where the speakers don't sound like total shit. "The customer is trying to find the exact right location for our speakers! He is in full critical mode, must not let him think he can make a judgment! Must burn in again!"![]()
And the sound always gets better in those reviews, it never seems to get worse..... 'after a week the sound stabilized and now it sounds great' is seen in many amateur 'reviews'.
With their frequency response, it would surprise me if one ever found the right location.
And yet, and yet, they sell. What does that say about 'audiophile' buyers? My old forum, HiFi Wigwam, has a
whole thread running about how wonderful they are.
S
Yes and there should be drugs provided to accelerate this process.Maybe the disclaimer is there to allows the brain to 'adjust' and get used to the presentation of the speaker.
Warranty is void if speakers are exposed to "indirect sunlight." I guess they have to be used in a windowless room of at least 35% relative humidity. Ridiculous.
Agreed; when I have researched and/or measured, most of the changes occur within seconds to minutes, then more gradually over time. Most audible changes take just minutes IME/IMO.
Dick Pierce posted on rec.audio in '93(?) that break in occurs in the first few minutes and is mostly due to the varnish breaking in on spiders. Any changes afterwards are due to hysteresis in suspension parts or heating, not break in.
Okay, so now here is a question that I posted on the last page. Wouldn't this break-in period occur during quality control in the factory? Are there not multiple passes of QC or is there just one quick check and that's it, it's shipped out to consumers?
Still don't know how it benefits the manufacturers to ship out a product that is not representative of final (best) performance but rather the opposite which then must improve after (x) number of hours. That makes no sense to me.
I recall visiting Burmester in Berlin and seeing a large room filled with racks of shelving full of naked cone drivers all being constantly driven at low frequency for days before being selected for the construction of their systems.A few had test rooms full of speakers playing pink noise for an hour to a day followed by a final check (usually a frequency sweep again).
Okay, so now here is a question that I posted on the last page. Wouldn't this break-in period occur during quality control in the factory? Are there not multiple passes of QC or is there just one quick check and that's it, it's shipped out to consumers?
Still don't know how it benefits the manufacturers to ship out a product that is not representative of final (best) performance but rather the opposite which then must improve after (x) number of hours. That makes no sense to me.
If a piece of electronics has a significant "break in" over time, then its a bad design and insufficiently controlling temp coefficient effects. I've designed analog electronics for commercial application to have very stable thermal and ageing characteristics, and it takes careful device selection, modeling and testing (ie work, not boutique thinking).
99.9% of what you hear reported as break in is human adaptation (or self delusion) and has nothing to do with changes in the gear.
..... Why 'audiophiles' accept any less is a mystery to me, all part, I suppose, of creating a mystique that audiophile products transcend science and engineering.
S.