• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

1More USB-C Headphone Adapter Review

Rate this headphone adapter:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 61 57.0%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 36 33.6%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 8 7.5%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 2 1.9%

  • Total voters
    107

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
46,394
Likes
260,289
Location
Seattle Area
This is a review and detailed measurements of teh 1More USB-C DAC and Headphone Adapter based on CX31993 IC. It is on kind loan from a member and is included in the 1MORE Penta Driver IEM.
1More USB-C Headphone Adapter DAC Amplifier review.jpg

This dongle looks like any other except that it didn't come with an adapter for USB-A host connection. It has a major problem though: the headphone socket is too loose barely making a connection. I barely got it working for this test. Whether they are all like this, I don't know.

1More USB-C Adapter Measurements
I was saddened to see that the output maxed out at just 1 volt instead of 2:
1More USB-C Headphone Adapter DAC Amplifier Measurement.png

Combined noise and distortion is very good however for a dongle with distortion at threshold of audibility. Dynamic range is also very good at full volume:
1More USB-C Headphone Adapter DAC Amplifier DNR Measurement.png


But as you see, it is quite poor when the Windows volume was adjusted for nominal 50 millivolts:
Best headphone adapter for IEMs.png


It seems to have high residual noise which could be system dependent.

Jitter had a lot of random noise impacting the clock which may be related to above:
1More USB-C Headphone Adapter DAC Amplifier Jitter Measurement.png

You can tell that from the wide "skirt" of the noise spectrum.

Output power is of course limited especially at 300 ohm:
1More USB-C Headphone Adapter DAC Amplifier power 300 ohm Measurement.png


best headphone adapter review 300 ohm power.png


1More USB-C Headphone Adapter DAC Amplifier power 32 ohm Measurement.png

best headphone adapter review 32 ohm power.png


Conclusions
I guess performance is what you expect for a "free" headphone dongle. Still, more could be done to optimize performance without a cost hit. The gain for example, is too low as both the 32 and 300 ohm measurements show no clipping. The fact that the headphone jack is broken doesn't inspire confidence as far as quality.

I can't recommend the 1MORE USB-C Dongle/Headphone Adapter.

------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
 
I wonder how this compares to Apple, Samsung or Meizu dongles, as it was not clear from the graphs provided.
 
I wonder how this compares to Apple, Samsung or Meizu dongles, as it was not clear from the graphs provided.
Decide if your headphones are low or high impedance and then look in the ranking graphs in the review. The higher the better.
 
And here, I thought, an adapter was just running wires from here to there and not doing anything else.
 
The headphone socket is solid on the Subynanal USB-C dongle DAC I bought on Amazon for $3. At the moment it's $6. It has a Realtek ALC5686 chipset.
 
I used a generic CX31993 dongle with DD and DD+BA IEMs and never heard a noise floor.

I suspect this is a worse implementation than whatever version you got, then.
The DUT has roughly the same noise floor as my Schiit Valhalla 2 and it's certainly noticeable there with my IEMs. I believe mine are less sensitive than the 1More Penta that this dongle comes with, so i'd be shocked if the combo didn't have an audible noise floor in a quiet room.

Anyone have a pair to confirm? (possibly @amirm could check?)
 
This is a review and detailed measurements of teh 1More USB-C DAC and Headphone Adapter based on CX31993 IC. It is on kind loan from a member and is included in the 1MORE Penta Driver IEM.
View attachment 378901
This dongle looks like any other except that it didn't come with an adapter for USB-A host connection. It has a major problem though: the headphone socket is too loose barely making a connection. I barely got it working for this test. Whether they are all like this, I don't know.

1More USB-C Adapter Measurements
I was saddened to see that the output maxed out at just 1 volt instead of 2:
View attachment 378902
Combined noise and distortion is very good however for a dongle with distortion at threshold of audibility. Dynamic range is also very good at full volume:
View attachment 378903

But as you see, it is quite poor when the Windows volume was adjusted for nominal 50 millivolts:
View attachment 378904

It seems to have high residual noise which could be system dependent.

Jitter had a lot of random noise impacting the clock which may be related to above:
View attachment 378905
You can tell that from the wide "skirt" of the noise spectrum.

Output power is of course limited especially at 300 ohm:
View attachment 378906

View attachment 378907

View attachment 378908
View attachment 378909

Conclusions
I guess performance is what you expect for a "free" headphone dongle. Still, more could be done to optimize performance without a cost hit. The gain for example, is too low as both the 32 and 300 ohm measurements show no clipping. The fact that the headphone jack is broken doesn't inspire confidence as far as quality.

I can't recommend the 1MORE USB-C Dongle/Headphone Adapter.

------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
I don't understand how the socket can be loose. Surely these are generic parts, made to spec by the thousand (or more)?
 
I use a usb-c dongle to aux to tape deck adapter in my 1999 Lexus. Noise noise every where, but I can still enjoy the music :) Dam Lexus and it's electronics will last forever.

I'm going to get the apple dongle for my Samsung phone.
 
Last edited:
I suspect this is a worse implementation than whatever version you got, then.
The DUT has roughly the same noise floor as my Schiit Valhalla 2 and it's certainly noticeable there with my IEMs. I believe mine are less sensitive than the 1More Penta that this dongle comes with, so i'd be shocked if the combo didn't have an audible noise floor in a quiet room.

Anyone have a pair to confirm? (possibly @amirm could check?)
The SINAD seems to drop more dramatically than expected with the volume adjusted to 50 mV out, I'd expect closer to 80-85 SINAD than 60 for CX31993 based on user measurements. Although here Amir chose a 600Ohm load which is a strange choice for a 1V dongle frankly. I can't rule out that this is how it performs under the given conditions. Unless in Amirs testing the volume was erroneously controlled in software instead of hardware, which would expectedly nerf the metrics, not reflective of real-world performance in that case.

1720106812483.png
 
Last edited:
I suspect this is a worse implementation than whatever version you got, then.
With these integrated SoC (USB bridge, DAC, Amp, ADC, charge pump), there is not much to “implement”. For a given chip, differences should be minimal…
 
Just got a new Motorola phone. Only USB-C, no 3,5mm ... if I wanted to enjoy some good sound, is it still the Apple dongle (does it work on an Android?) or anything else I should keep looking for?

//
 
Back
Top Bottom