• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

1MORE Penta Driver IEM Review

Rate this IEM:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 32 30.8%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 60 57.7%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 11 10.6%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 1 1.0%

  • Total voters
    104

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
45,467
Likes
250,845
Location
Seattle Area
This is a review, listening tests, EQ and detailed measurements of the 1MORE Penta Driver P50 IEM. It is on kind loan from a member and costs US $120.
1MORE Penta Driver Headphones - P50 planer driver review.jpg

Sorry about the lousy picture. The silicone cable is nice to use but makes it impossible to position the drivers for a picture. As the name indicates the IEM sports one dynamic driver and no less than four planar drivers. Is more better? We will find out. Company claims that the sound is tuned by Luca Bignardi recording engineer. Here he is talking about his ideas of tonality:


The IEM and accessories feel luxurious compared to what you get in $50 and less category IEMs. They are light, small and nice to handle. Note below however on difficulty of getting the tips to fit my ear and test fixture.

If you are not familiar with my headphone measurements and reviews, I highly suggest you watch my tutorial on headphone testing.

1MORE Penta Driver IEM Measurements
The IEM comes with two kinds of tips. I started testing with the set that has a grill (filter?) in it but the surrounding silicone material was too soft to get it to mount properly to my GRAS 45CA headphone measurement system. So I switched to the set that doesn't have a grill but is somewhat firmer. For both listening and testing I used the largest tips.

1MORE Penta Driver Headphones - P50 Impedance frequency response Measurement.png


This is an odd response I have not seen before. Likely the result of tuning per introduction. I was happy to see the nice bass response, but not the overboosted lower treble. And underboosted upper treble. Relative response shows variations that is hard to mimic manually with parametric EQ:
1MORE Penta Driver Headphones - P50 Impedance relative frequency response Measurement.png


We see somewhat typical distortion profile:
1MORE Penta Driver Headphones - P50 relative distortion THD Measurement.png

1MORE Penta Driver Headphones - P50 distortion THD Measurement.png

Unfortunate to see such rise in lower treble.

Group delay is not very eventful but does show the signature of multiple drivers/filtering:
1MORE Penta Driver Headphones - P50 Group Delay Measurement.png


We see the same to some extent in the odd impedance graph:
1MORE Penta Driver Headphones - P50 Impedance Measurement.png


Sensitivity is low for an IEM:
Best IEM review.png



1MORE Penta Driver Listening Tests and Equalization
Out of box sound was very odd which is readily explained by the frequency response. I was not hopeful that I could EQ it right but was surprised how great it took to my simple EQ:

1MORE Penta Driver Headphones - P50 equalization.png


With this in place, the sound was impressively good.

You may have noticed that I did not mess with the extra energy in upper bass. At first wearing, despite using the largest tips, I was not getting much bass. Toward the end the of the testing, I managed to get them just right in my ear and was then able to hear the impressive and clean bass.

Conclusions
The build of Penta Drive is quite nice and price is rather reasonable and fits what you get. The tuning though is truly odd but nicely has enough bass. It lent itself well to equalization despite my expectation otherwise. With EQ, the sound was very nice, with high resolution, clean and open sound (for an IEM).

I can't recommend the 1MORE Penta Drive IEM. I hope the company adopts proper research for target curve than chasing "stars" in the Pro industry. And yes, I do now wonder how Luca has managed to win all those Grammy awards with preference like this!

------------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
 

Attachments

  • 1MORE Penta Driver Headphones - P50.zip
    33.1 KB · Views: 46
What a curious beast. Are those cables detachable and if so, standard 2 pin or are they the less common MMC?
 
Ive said it once and i'll say it again, 1More is a shell of their former self. The company went mainstream and they just forgot how to make products anymore. For $100 you can buy like 5 sets of Moondrop Chu2 which will have the better measured performance & at least it adheres to the conventional/normie harman curve w/ far lower distortion.

I dont subscribe to the tuning of Harman, but clearly if they were trying to do some kind of harman esque tuning and charging $100+ dollars for it. a lot better.... I have strong doubts that this IEM has any redeeming features that cant be measured like the soundstage or technical detail either to redeem itself
 
What a curious beast. Are those cables detachable and if so, standard 2 pin or are they the less common MMC?
They came already connected so I don't know. I am sure the owner will respond tomorrow.
 
And yes, I do now wonder how Luca has managed to win all those Grammy awards with preference like this!
Me every time I see NS-10s in a studio of a 'great' producer.
 
What a curious beast. Are those cables detachable and if so, standard 2 pin or are they the less common MMC?
Looks like MMCX.


1719826993587.png
 
Is there an ASR consensus on the use of multiple drivers in IEMs? We have single DD IEMs such as the 7Hz Zero 2s with vanishingly low harmonic distortion. I haven’t seen many multi-driver IEMs measured but the ones I’ve seen have significantly more distortion. I’d imagine that all those crossovers would add thd and/or IMD, though I’m pretty hazy on the details. Do multi driver designs bring anything to the table or is it all marketing and hokum?
 
How good or bad is the dongle that it includes?

Do multi driver designs bring anything to the table or is it all marketing and hokum?

If you are interested in anecdotal evidence, I have IEMs with one, three, five, seven and ten drivers per side, and my absolute favorites are the 1 planar driver per side MP145s.

I don't think that price nor number of drivers are strongly correlated with quality, but they may be weakly inversely correlated (more drivers, more crossovers, more experimental technology, more need to innovate with FR to differentiate the product = more opportunities to mess up).

I do like planars more than DDs, both more than BAs and anything more than microplanars and PZTs.

Again, everything is anecdotal and based on my limited personal experience.

But IEMs seem to be an almost solved problem. My only gripes are too much ear gain in most tunnings and lack of open backs, if that last thing is even possible for an IEM.

I give almost no use to my headphone collection anymore, and very little use to my speakers. Even cheap IEMs are that good nowadays.
 
Last edited:
Is there an ASR consensus on the use of multiple drivers in IEMs? We have single DD IEMs such as the 7Hz Zero 2s with vanishingly low harmonic distortion. I haven’t seen many multi-driver IEMs measured but the ones I’ve seen have significantly more distortion. I’d imagine that all those crossovers would add thd and/or IMD, though I’m pretty hazy on the details. Do multi driver designs bring anything to the table or is it all marketing and hokum?
The zero and zero red have dual dynamic drivers
 
Is there an ASR consensus on the use of multiple drivers in IEMs? We have single DD IEMs such as the 7Hz Zero 2s with vanishingly low harmonic distortion. I haven’t seen many multi-driver IEMs measured but the ones I’ve seen have significantly more distortion. I’d imagine that all those crossovers would add thd and/or IMD, though I’m pretty hazy on the details. Do multi driver designs bring anything to the table or is it all marketing and hokum?
Consider multidriver an additional tool to achieve a desired stock response. This part is defintiely measureable.

Some people take positions that different drivers configurations bring advantages that are not directly reflected in measurements and marketing plays into it. This part is entirely in the subjective realm.

Multidriver IEMs exist with super low distortion, Truthear Zero Red like ehabheikal said.
 
In a general way balaced armature drivers (BA) present a higher ditortion than dynamic ones, and given that most multidrivers iems are hybrid with at least one BA, that explain a general idea of correlation between multidrivers and distortion.
 
are there any non–harman shaped iems? something more flatty? these could be interesting to review/use
 
are there any non–harman shaped iems? something more flatty? these could be interesting to review/use

 
Back
Top Bottom