• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

1 bit DAC launched by TOPPING

The new 1-bit DAC looks very nice. The conversion module has a lot of components for a 1-bit DAC.

Could it be multiple concurrent 1-bit DAC followed by summing all the outputs?

I am looking forward to seeing the measurements…

In that case it would be … inspired ( ? ) by the Tambaqui
 
Yes, the user manuals, and FCC certification enclosures/documentation indicates TRS outputs. Nowhere in the user manual (or from internal photos) is there any indication of, or facilities for DSP. D90 III, different story.

I'm more than satisfied 3 years on with my $750/used (AK4490) RME ADI-2 DAC FS :cool:
1710148087345.jpg
 
Will the EQ be stored on the DAC so that you could plug it into another computer and still have the EQ active?
 
Will the EQ be stored on the DAC so that you could plug it into another computer and still have the EQ active?
Depends where each profile (it says you can have multiple) is stored.
Judging by the MCU's limited storage I would bet they will be stored in the computer's side.
So...
 
Depends where each profile (it says you can have multiple) is stored.
Judging by the MCU's limited storage I would bet they will be stored in the computer's side.
So...
Thinking about it a little more,it's 192Khz/32-bit limitation can be a tell that each selected profile is stored in the device as there would be no reason to limit it if it was on the computer's side.
Computers can do a lot-lot better than that.
 
Thinking about it a little more,it's 192Khz/32-bit limitation can be a tell that each selected profile is stored in the device as there would be no reason to limit it if it was on the computer's side.
Computers can do a lot-lot better than that.
Maybe 1 profile in dac and more can be saved on pc side to be uploaded when connected
 
In that case it would be … inspired ( ? ) by the Tambaqui
Tambaqui is not a 1-bit dac.
I am quoting Bruno Putzeys here:

"The Tambaqui sits more or less in this camp: the PWM signal has a switching frequency of 3.125MHz, and can take 33 discrete lengths from 0*10ns to 32*10ns. So it's basically a 5-bit, 3.125MHz converter. The choice for PWM was given by the need to get rid of those idle tones I mentioned."

https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...-and-streamer-review.10770/page-5#post-300699
You can also read why he developed a pwm dac rather than 1-bit dac or a ESS/AKM based dac.
 
Last edited:
I think 6 channels means balanced stereo (4ch) + single ended stereo (2 ch)
Balanced stereo is still only 2 channels, not 4. And unless you can apply different PEQ to SE and balanced outputs, which would be unusual and notable, it's still only 2 channels.
 
Balanced stereo is still only 2 channels, not 4. And unless you can apply different PEQ to SE and balanced outputs, which would be unusual and notable, it's still only 2 channels.
I mean channels of amplification. Balanced stereo requires 4 independent amplifiers
 
Tambaqui is not a 1-bit dac.
I am quoting Bruno Putzeys here:

"The Tambaqui sits more or less in this camp: the PWM signal has a switching frequency of 3.125MHz, and can take 33 discrete lengths from 0*10ns to 32*10ns. So it's basically a 5-bit, 3.125MHz converter. The choice for PWM was given by the need to get rid of those idle tones I mentioned."

https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...-and-streamer-review.10770/page-5#post-300699
You can also read why he developed a pwm dac rather than 1-bit dac or a ESS/AKM based dac.

Yes I know, but we see more "lanes" on the D900 board, so it coud be several 1-bit streams added together (which is what the Tambaqui is doing with 33 of them - it is an original take on the PWM DAC idea - note also that only one is changed at a time with a clock of 32*3.125 = 100Mhz).
 
Tambaqui is not a 1-bit dac.
I am quoting Bruno Putzeys here:

"The Tambaqui sits more or less in this camp: the PWM signal has a switching frequency of 3.125MHz, and can take 33 discrete lengths from 0*10ns to 32*10ns. So it's basically a 5-bit, 3.125MHz converter. The choice for PWM was given by the need to get rid of those idle tones I mentioned."

https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...-and-streamer-review.10770/page-5#post-300699
You can also read why he developed a pwm dac rather than 1-bit dac or a ESS/AKM based dac.
But Is it still the case in PRO sabre series? According to manufacturer it is not:

 

Attachments

  • d.png
    d.png
    176.8 KB · Views: 74
Stack 16 of them in a box to compete with normal current DACs. This is dumb. Why go backwards? No advantage to DSD and no advantage to this.

I guess it might sell to the people who like PS Audio and believe subjective reviews.

You still do not know how it is designed and you already judge it?
 
The XMOS can receive other digital inputs, not just USB. Limiting DSP to USB would be a design choice, not an XMOS limitation.
So what other reason could it be?
Reserving it for the bigger models?

They do stare that D90 III is DSP'd on all inputs.
 
Back
Top Bottom